GBAF Logo
Global Banking & Finance Awards® 2026 Nominations open, free to enter Nominate now →
ICC, insurer Axa cut ties amid Trump campaign against court - Finance news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
Finance

ICC, insurer Axa cut ties amid Trump campaign against court

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on October 1, 2026

2 min read

· Last updated: October 1, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

ICC and Insurer Axa End Contract Amid US Sanctions, Trump Campaign Pressure

Contract Termination and Its Context

ICC Ends Contract with Axa

Oct 1 (Reuters) - The International Criminal Court has ended its contract with French life and health insurer Axa starting October 1 and will now be using a new health insurance provider, a spokesperson for the Hague-based court said.

The spokesperson gave no reason for the decision, which was first reported on Thursday by the Financial Times, and declined to name the new insurance provider.

US Pressure and Political Backdrop

Trump Administration's Stance on ICC

President Donald Trump recently urged other countries to leave the ICC, calling it "evil" and "a rogue institution," amid an escalating US campaign against the court.

The Trump administration says the ICC oversteps its authority by claiming jurisdiction over citizens of countries, including the United States and Israel, which have not ratified the court's founding treaty, known as the Rome Statute.

Statements from ICC and Axa

"AXA and the Court have decided by mutual agreement to terminate the contractual relationship," the ICC spokesperson told Reuters in a statement.

AXA did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

Sanctions and Legal Complexities

Impact of US Sanctions

The FT said in its report that Axa had cited "risks arising from the extraterritorial application of US sanctions", which the insurer said reflected "an international environment that has become increasingly tense and complex for businesses".

Internal Discussions and Blocking Statutes

The newspaper, citing a person familiar with the matter, said Axa had held months of discussions internally and with the ICC about potential workarounds, but was unable to find a solution without a so-called blocking statute.

Definition of Blocking Statutes

Blocking statutes are legal ⁠mechanisms designed to protect ​Europeans from ​the ⁠extraterritorial effects of sanctions imposed ⁠by ​third countries.

Further US Measures Against ICC

The US has imposed financial sanctions and visa bans on ICC staff, and officials have prepared sanctions that could undercut the court's ability to operate, sources familiar with the matter earlier told Reuters.

(Reporting by Kanjyik Ghosh in Barcelona and Chandni Shah in Bengaluru; Editing by Alison Williams and Gareth Jones)

Key Takeaways

  • ICC ended contract with Axa due to concerns over U.S. sanctions’ extraterritorial reach (bluewaterhealthyliving.com)
  • The move reflects growing business complexities amid Washington’s intensified campaign to dismantle ICC via sanctions, travel bans, and diplomatic pressure (investing.com)
  • A blocking statute—legal mechanism to counter extraterritorial sanctions—is central to discussions but has yet to resolve insurer’s concerns (amnesty.org)

References

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the ICC end its contract with Axa?
The ICC and Axa ended their contract by mutual agreement. Reports suggest concerns about US sanctions and the complex international environment influenced the decision.
Who is the ICC's new health insurance provider?
The ICC spokesperson declined to name the new health insurance provider.
What role did US sanctions play in the ICC and Axa contract termination?
US financial sanctions against ICC staff contributed to increased risks for Axa, leading to the contract's end after unsuccessful workaround discussions.
What is a blocking statute in this context?
A blocking statute is a legal tool designed to shield European entities from the extraterritorial effects of sanctions imposed by third countries, such as the US.
What actions has the US taken against the ICC?
The US has imposed financial sanctions and visa bans on ICC staff and urged other countries to leave the court.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category