GBAF Logo
Global Banking & Finance Awards® 2026 Nominations open, free to enter Nominate now →
US and Iran discuss phased deal to reopen Hormuz and end US blockade, sources say - Finance news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
Finance

US and Iran discuss phased deal to reopen Hormuz and end US blockade, sources say

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on September 24, 2026

6 min read

· Last updated: September 24, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

US and Iran Explore Phased Deal to Open Hormuz, End Blockade

Negotiations and Diplomatic Efforts to Resolve the US-Iran Conflict

By Samia Nakhoul, Parisa Hafezi and John Irish

Sept 24 (Reuters) - US and Iranian negotiators in New York are exploring a phased path out of war that would involve Tehran reopening the Strait of Hormuz and Washington lifting its economic blockade of Iran, sources close to the talks said.

The strait has become the central bargaining chip in efforts to end the nearly seven-month US-Iran conflict, with Iran seeking relief from the US blockade that is choking its economy and Washington seeking free passage for ships on the global oil supply route now blocked by Tehran.

The talks face a big obstacle as neither side wants to be the first to surrender its leverage, according to comments to Reuters by two Iranian sources, two regional officials and two Western diplomatic sources, but behind Iran's stance is a recognition of the economic cost of prolonged confrontation.

Phased Arrangement as a Path Forward

A senior Iranian official said the most plausible way to end the impasse would be a phased arrangement, with Iran allowing navigation through Hormuz in return for the US lifting its economic blockade and Tehran potentially gaining access to frozen assets.

"One way forward would be to solve the crisis in stages. The first would be to end the blockade and reopen Hormuz," he said on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly.

Challenges in Achieving a Durable Deal

That would involve US President Donald Trump accepting another temporary fix, after an earlier understanding collapsed in July. So a central challenge facing the negotiators is not just to sketch out a deal but also to ensure any concessions are durable enough for both sides to trust, the sources said.

Trump has said he thinks the US and ​Iran could reach a deal after midterm elections to Congress ​on November 3. A senior European official said the Iranians "have a very long list of demands."

The White House and the US State Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment for this article.

Potential Benefits and Political Incentives

Former US negotiator Dennis Ross said he saw only a 30% chance of an agreement being reached before the vote, but that both sides may have stronger reasons to make a deal before than after the midterms.

"The blockade is what's really squeezing the Iranians. It's strangling them," Ross said.

A deal before the midterms could benefit Trump, as reopening Hormuz could ease tensions in the Gulf, contain oil prices and help bring down politically sensitive US gasoline prices.

Iran's chances of gaining much-needed economic relief may be greater while Trump still has a greater political incentive to strike a bargain.

After the midterms, Ross said, Trump may face fewer constraints and be more willing to intensify pressure or consider military options.

Leverage and Obstacles in Negotiations

Mutual Leverage as a Barrier

LEVERAGE AS OBSTACLE?

The leverage that brought Washington and Tehran back to negotiations could also make compromise harder.

Washington controls the pressure that is hurting Tehran most, while Tehran controls access to a critical energy chokepoint. Neither side wants to surrender that leverage without extracting something tangible in return.

This means the midterms may be less a deadline for diplomacy than for preserving the conditions that make the diplomatic efforts possible. If Washington and Tehran cannot turn leverage into a deal before the midterms, the diplomatic window could narrow as the risk of escalation grows.

Even as it seeks a diplomatic off-ramp, Tehran is preparing for the possibility of renewed war with Washington, the Iranian official said, accusing the US of using the economic blockade and threat of force as tools of coercion.

"Our fingers are on the trigger,” said the senior Iranian official. “The Americans know what they need to do but, because of their excessive demands, the chances of diplomacy resolving this are extremely low.”

Transit Fees and Regional Positions

Regional sources said Tehran was willing to drop a demand for payment of transit fees to use the Strait of Hormuz from the main agreement and put the demand in a side attachment instead, as ending the blockade had become the more urgent priority.

Gulf states have rejected the proposal for payment of transit fees. Any arrangement would be temporary, not a formal abandonment of Iran’s position, the regional sources said.

US Economic Pressure and Sanctions

The US has tightened the economic vice on Iran, layering new sanctions on top of a blockade that has choked off Iran's oil exports, an important source of hard currency.

This month, it targeted Iran's remaining commercial airlines and support networks as part of a campaign to sever the economic lifelines sustaining the government and the powerful Revolutionary Guards. Trump warned that Iran's economy could "rot" unless it reached a deal.

"Iran is not primarily focused on imposing tolls in Hormuz but on preserving its administrative control of the waterway,” he said. "Iran may be willing to defer the toll issue, but they are not going to give up administrative control of the strait.”

Diplomatic Tensions and Regional Concerns

Core Tensions in New York Diplomacy

At the heart of the diplomacy in New York is a fundamental tension. Washington wants pressure to produce concessions, Tehran wants pressure removed before making them, and the Gulf states want the conflict resolved without allowing the region's strategic waterways to become enduring bargaining chips.

Fears of an Open-Ended Conflict

FEARS OF AN OPEN-ENDED CONFLICT

During a separate meeting with Trump in New York, Gulf leaders sought clarity on Washington's endgame beyond the midterms, including on whether the US would resume military action if Iran refused to return to negotiations.

They conveyed their collective rejection of any Iranian control of Hormuz, saying freedom of navigation must be restored and that the strategic waterway should not become a tool of coercion against Gulf states, regional sources said.

Yet alongside their warnings over Hormuz, Gulf leaders have pressed hard for de-escalation and a polit

Key Takeaways

  • The proposed phased deal would restore safe passage through Hormuz while easing US sanctions and economic pressure on Iran — echoing the June memorandum of understanding, though trust remains fragile (aljazeera.com).
  • Both Washington and Tehran view the strait and economic sanctions as central bargaining chips; neither wants to give ground first, complicating efforts to reach a durable arrangement (apnews.com).
  • The timing is politically charged: a deal before the November 3 midterms could help lower oil prices and boost President Trump’s prospects, while delays risk narrowing the diplomatic window (apnews.com).

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main points of the US-Iran negotiations?
The negotiations focus on Iran reopening the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for the US lifting its economic blockade of Iran.
Why is the Strait of Hormuz important in these talks?
The Strait of Hormuz is a key global oil supply route currently blocked by Iran, making it central to the discussions.
What are the challenges facing the US-Iran deal?
Both sides are reluctant to surrender their leverage, and there is uncertainty about making concessions that both can trust.
How could the outcome impact global oil prices?
Reopening Hormuz could ease tensions, potentially lower oil prices, and help stabilize global markets.
What is the potential timeline for reaching an agreement?
A deal may be possible before the US midterm elections, as political incentives are stronger before the vote.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category