Germany says US troop drawdown should spur Europe, but top Republicans worried
US Troop Withdrawal from Germany and Its Implications
(This May 2 story has been repeated with no changes to the text.)
By Sabine Siebold and Andreas Rinke
Background and Announcement of Troop Drawdown
BERLIN, May 2 (Reuters) - A planned drawdown of 5,000 U.S. troops from Germany should spur Europe to strengthen its own defences, German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said on Saturday, but two top U.S. Republican lawmakers expressed concern, saying the troops should not leave Europe.
The Pentagon announced the drawdown from Germany, its largest European base, on Friday, as a rift over the Iran war and tariff tensions placed further strain on relations between the U.S. and Europe.
"We're going to cut way down and we're cutting a lot further than 5,000," U.S. President Donald Trump said in remarks to reporters in Florida on Saturday when asked about the plan.
As part of the U.S. decision, a Biden-era plan to deploy a U.S. battalion with long-range Tomahawk missiles to Germany has also been dropped - a blow to Berlin, which had pushed for the move as a powerful deterrent against Russia.
Republican Lawmakers' Concerns
Republican lawmakers Senator Roger Wicker and Representative Mike Rogers, the chairs of the Senate and House armed services committees, said they were "very concerned." They said the troops should not be moved from Europe, but moved east.
"Prematurely reducing America’s forward presence in Europe before those capabilities are fully realized risks undermining deterrence and sending the wrong signal to (Russian President) Vladimir Putin," they said in a joint statement.
NATO and European Responses
NATO Working with Washington on Details
NATO WORKING WITH WASHINGTON ON DETAILS
Pistorius said the partial withdrawal was expected and would affect a current U.S. presence of almost 40,000 soldiers stationed in Germany.
"We Europeans must take on more responsibility for our own security," Pistorius said, adding, "Germany is on the right track" by expanding its armed forces, speeding up military procurement and building infrastructure.
Trump called for a reduced military presence in Germany as far back as his first term and has repeatedly urged Europe to take responsibility for its defence. However, he stepped up the threat earlier this week after sparring with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who has questioned Washington's exit strategy in the Middle East.
The Pentagon said the troop withdrawal was expected to be completed over the next six to 12 months. It did not say which bases would be affected, nor whether the troops would return to the U.S. or be redeployed within Europe or elsewhere.
A NATO spokesperson said the alliance was working with the U.S. to understand the details of the decision.
Concerns from NATO Allies
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, whose country is seeking assurances of continued U.S. support on NATO's eastern flank amid the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, also expressed concern about the latest setback to the alliance.
"The greatest threat to the transatlantic community are not its external enemies, but the ongoing disintegration of our alliance. We must all do what it takes to reverse this disastrous trend," Tusk wrote on X on Saturday.
Economic and Political Context
The Pentagon's plans were the latest blow to Germany from Washington this weekend, after Trump said he would ratchet up tariffs on EU auto imports to 25%, accusing the EU of not upholding a trade deal - in a move that threatens to cost the German economy billions.
A foreign policy official from Chancellor Merz's CDU party said the two announcements should be viewed in light of pressure on Trump both at home and abroad, amid weak opinion polling and pressure over unresolved conflicts in Ukraine, Venezuela and Iran.
"Against this backdrop, both the troop withdrawal and the trade policy seem less like the expression of a coherent strategy and more like a political reflex and a reaction born of frustration," Peter Beyer told Reuters.
Military Capabilities and Strategic Impact
Long-Range Fires Battalion Cancelled
LONG-RANGE FIRES BATTALION CANCELLED
NATO members have pledged to take on more responsibility for their own defence but with tight budgets and vast gaps in military capability, it will take years for the region to meet its own security needs.
Germany wants to boost the number of active-duty Bundeswehr soldiers from a current 185,000 to 260,000, though critics of the defence minister have called for more in response to a widely perceived growing threat from Russia.
Historical Context of US Military Presence
The U.S. military presence in Germany, which began as an occupation force after World War Two, peaked during the 1960s when hundreds of thousands of American military personnel were stationed there to counter the Soviet Union during the Cold War.
The presence includes the giant Ramstein airbase and Landstuhl hospital, both of which have been used by the U.S. to support its war in Iran, as well as previous conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Operational Impact of Withdrawal
The Pentagon decision means one full brigade will leave Germany and a long-range fires battalion that was due to be deployed later this year will be cancelled.
The long-range fires had been due to form a significant extra element of deterrence against Russia while Europeans developed such long-range missiles themselves.
The U.S. "holds a factual monopoly inside NATO" on long-range fires, Christian Moelling, director of European defence think tank EDINA, wrote on X. "That is why this is operationally more serious than the troop number."
(Additional reporting by Ross Kerber, Rachel More, Andrew Gray, Marek Strzelecki and David Brunnstrom; editing by James Mackenzie, Ross Colvin, William Maclean, Sharon Singleton and Alistair Bell)
