GBAF Logo
Global Banking & Finance Awards® 2026 Nominations open, free to enter Nominate now →
Musk’s pay under a SpaceX-Tesla merger: voting control, but no $1 trillion payday​ - Finance news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
Finance

Musk’s pay under a SpaceX-Tesla merger: voting control, but no $1 trillion payday​

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on November 3, 2026

6 min read

· Last updated: November 3, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

How a SpaceX-Tesla Merger Would Impact Elon Musk’s Pay and Control

Elon Musk’s Compensation, Control, and the Implications of a SpaceX-Tesla Merger

By Chris Kirkham

Nov 3 (Reuters) - Elon Musk’s recent super-sized pay packages at SpaceX and Tesla were centered on some eye-popping goals: creating a 1 million-person human colony on Mars, putting a million robotaxis on the road and selling a million humanoid robots.

The Shortcut to Corporate Control

A merger combining Musk’s trillion-dollar rocket and electric vehicle firms would mean he might not ever need to meet those lofty targets to achieve his ultimate goal: control over his corporate empire.

Musk said on a SpaceX earnings call last month that both companies' boards had formed special committees to discuss a potential merger. A deal could give him the voting control at Tesla that he has said he wants, without his having to hit any of the milestones in his pay plan.

As for Musk’s compensation, a merger initially would likely award him only a sliver of the $1 trillion in stock from last year’s widely discussed Tesla pay package, according to a Reuters review of the plan and six executive-compensation experts. SpaceX’s board could also restructure his compensation plan after a potential Tesla deal, the experts said.

An examination of Musk’s compensation packages at both companies shows that the structure of SpaceX’s plan, which gives Musk voting power upfront before earning the stock, helps provide a shortcut to gaining control of Tesla.

That makes the provocative, futuristic Mars and humanoid robot goals more of an afterthought, according to the experts who reviewed the plans for Reuters.

“It’s irrelevant,” said Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware. “This package is a distraction from the real story, which is complete control.”

'Ambitious Stuff' and the Structure of Musk’s Pay Plans

The $1 trillion Tesla compensation plan that shareholders approved for Musk last year required him to hit a series of market-capitalization and operational milestones in order to collect more stock and amass more voting control.

Leading up to SpaceX’s IPO this summer, the company’s board granted Musk stock awards tied to boosting the company’s market cap, getting a million people to Mars and building massive space data centers. Unless Musk achieved the Mars and data center goals, he could not pocket the shares, according to the agreements.

Importantly, though, Musk immediately got all the voting power associated with those shares, just not the economic rights. That got him to 85% control over SpaceX without needing to hit any goals. Musk already had significant ownership in SpaceX before being awarded those additional voting rights.

Matthew Bloomfield, an associate professor of accounting at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, said he viewed the SpaceX plan, crafted so close to the IPO, as “just a marketing document.”

“You put a bunch of ambitious stuff in there and a lot of people say, ‘Look at this big bet Elon Musk is putting on himself,’” he said. In reality, the plan is mostly about “getting a bunch of people hyped,” he said.

Musk, Tesla and SpaceX did not respond to requests for comment.

The Tesla Plan: Control Tied to Performance

The story at Tesla is the opposite. A flashy compensation package that awarded Musk up to $1 trillion in Tesla stock last year was designed to give him more control over the company, but only as he meets operational and market-cap goals over time.

Musk has not yet achieved any of the targets in the Tesla plan. Even if he were to hit all of the goals, including increasing the company's market cap nearly eightfold, he would have only about 29% of the voting power at Tesla, according to documents the board presented last year.

As Tesla’s board was shopping the plan to investors last year, Musk himself said that gaining more control over Tesla was the goal, highlighting the risks of building AI-powered robots.

“My fundamental concern with regard to how much voting control I have in Tesla is: If I go ahead and build this enormous robot army, can I just be ousted at some point in the future?” he said on an October 2025 Tesla earnings call.

Merger Offers Shortcut to Tesla Control

A merger offers a far quicker path to getting that control.

Voting Power and Share Structure

Barclays analysts estimated in a recent investor note that at the current size of each company, if SpaceX were to acquire Tesla, then Musk would own about 37% of the new conglomerate but have 56% of the voting power. That is because many of his SpaceX shares are in a special class that carries 10 times the voting rights of the typical shareholder. There is no such class of shares at Tesla.

Musk’s SpaceX and Tesla compensation plans contemplate what would happen in the event of a merger.

Tesla’s “Change in Control” Clause

For Tesla, the language in the agreement is straightforward. In a “change in control” event such as an acquisition by SpaceX, Musk could receive stock payouts for meeting market-cap goals without the added requirement of an operational goal like having 1 million robotaxis in operation.

The market cap would be calculated based on the stock price immediately before the merger or the value that Tesla shareholders receive from the transaction, whichever is greater.

Tesla’s current market capitalization is about $1.6 trillion. That would need to grow to $2 trillion in connection with the merger for Musk to receive any stock awards under the plan. (Meeting that goal would issue him $20 billion in Tesla shares at a $2 trillion valuation, though it would be worth less because the plan only compensates Musk for stock growth after his pay plan was announced, in September 2025.)

Musk could receive more if the market capitalization grew to $2.5 trillion, $3 trillion or higher after a deal, though the six compensation experts said such a premium would be unlikely.

SpaceX Board Could Revise Musk's Plan

The SpaceX compensation plan is less specific about wh

Key Takeaways

  • A merger could grant Musk majority voting control of the combined company even if he never achieves the gargantuan operational goals tied to his $1 trillion‑plus compensation at Tesla and SpaceX. Experts call the Mars, robotaxi and humanoid robot milestones largely symbolic in that scenario.
  • With SpaceX's dual‑class structure, Musk already controls over 80–85% of voting power despite a smaller economic stake, enabling immediate dominance upon IPO—providing a governance path that bypasses performance hurdles. That dynamic would extend to Tesla post‑merger.
  • Analysts at Piper Sandler now view a SpaceX‑Tesla merger as “likelier than not,” projecting Musk would retain over 70% voting control. The merger’s primary value for Musk appears less about “payday” and more about consolidating power, overriding shareholder‑approved milestones.

Frequently Asked Questions

What would happen to Elon Musk’s pay if SpaceX and Tesla merge?
A merger would give Musk voting control without granting him the $1 trillion Tesla pay package unless key milestones are achieved.
Would Musk need to meet operational targets to gain control after a merger?
No, he could gain voting control even without achieving the ambitious Mars, robot, or market cap goals in his pay plans.
How do Musk’s compensation plans differ at SpaceX and Tesla?
SpaceX gives Musk voting power upfront before meeting milestones, while Tesla’s plan ties both stock and voting power to achieving operational objectives.
Could a merger change Musk’s compensation structure?
Yes, experts suggest that a merger could prompt a restructuring of Musk’s compensation by the SpaceX board.
How much voting power could Musk hold at Tesla compared to SpaceX?
Even after hitting all Tesla plan goals, Musk would hold 29% voting power, much less than the 85% at SpaceX.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category