GBAF Logo
Global Banking & Finance Awards® 2026 Nominations open, free to enter Nominate now →
Trump imposes new global tariffs, drawing protests from trading partners - Finance news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
Finance

Trump imposes new global tariffs, drawing protests from trading partners

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on July 24, 2026

5 min read

· Last updated: July 24, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

Trump imposes new global tariffs, drawing protests from trading partners

Overview of New U.S. Tariffs and International Reactions

By David Lawder

WASHINGTON, July 24 (Reuters) - The United States on Friday imposed new tariffs of 10% and 12.5% on goods from 60 trading partners, including the EU and China, alleging those countries failed to curb imports made by forced labor, just as a temporary 10% global tariff expired.

The move is the White House's first step in efforts to rebuild President Donald Trump's near-global tariff wall after the U.S. Supreme Court in February struck down his "reciprocal" duties of 10% to 50% imposed last year under a national emergencies law to try to shrink the U.S. trade deficit.

New tariffs had been expected, but trade partners around the world joined in strongly disputing the justification for them. Some, however, noted they would make no difference to current levies or even marked a slight improvement.

Bond yields edged higher as the tariffs added to inflation risk, but reaction was generally limited in financial markets more focused on the Middle East conflict.

The new tariffs, announced in a Federal Register notice, cover 99.4% of U.S. imports, but include numerous product exemptions, such as oil and gas, fertilizer and certain food items.

The U.S. claims that trading partners had failed to clamp down on trade in goods made with forced labor passing through their supply chains, an accusation those countries deny.

"The United States has had a forced labor import ban for nearly a century, and rigorously enforces it. It’s well past time for our trading partners to do the same," U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a statement. 

"Today’s action will begin to correct what is both a human rights abuse and distortive trade practice to improve the welfare of workers everywhere."

Legal Basis and Implementation of Tariffs

Imposed under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, the new duties allow the administration to maintain a tariff floor on virtually all U.S. imports despite the Supreme Court setback. The tariffs are also likely to face less legal risk as Section 301 has survived prior court challenges.

Trump's temporary 10% global tariff expired at 12:01 a.m. EDT on Friday (0401 GMT) after 150 days. The new duties took effect at that exact same moment, with goods in transit exempted until 12:01 a.m. EDT on July 28.

Tariff Details by Country and Region

TARIFF DETAILS

The U.S. imposed a 10% duty on goods of Argentina, Bangladesh, Britain, Cambodia, Canada, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Jordan, Malaysia, Mexico, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Trinidad and Tobago saying they had bans or plans to ban forced labor imports but were not effectively enforcing such prohibitions. 

The European Union, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea and Switzerland were assigned rates that, combined with pre-existing most-favored-nation tariff rates, totaled 10% or 12.5%.

The other 38 countries were assigned a 12.5% rate. These include Vietnam, which issued a new decree this week that sets out more detailed rules banning imports of goods made with forced labor, and China - accused by the U.S. of detaining Uyghur minorities in work camps, which Beijing denies. 

Trade Deal Commitments and Responses

Greer previously pledged that for countries with trade deals with Washington capping U.S. tariff rates, the new forced labor duties would not push them above those caps - a point which the European Union noted in its response.

"The EU notes positively the fact that this outcome is in line with the U.S. tariff commitments agreed under the EU-U.S. Joint Statement," a European Commission spokesperson said, adding it provided "positive momentum" to continue the work on exploring further tariff exemptions and deepening cooperation.

French Trade Minister Nicolas Forissier said that, while the legal basis raised questions, the tariffs nonetheless provided greater visibility for businesses.

While disputing the allegations underlying the forced labor investigation, the Swiss government also said the United States was adhering to past commitments on tariff ceilings, in its case of up to 12.5%.

Former EU chief negotiator Ignacio Garcia Bercero, now a senior fellow at think tank Bruegel, said the United States had sought to ensure the new duties respected the tariff aspects of the EU-U.S. trade deal, but noted that additional tariffs from a further Section 301 investigation into excess capacity were still to come. That targets 16 trading partners, including the EU, China, India, Japan, South Korea and Switzerland.

Britain, which is not a target of that second probe, said the latest move would have no negative effects.

"Our agreement with the U.S. remains in place, and today we see an improvement to our trading terms with zero tariffs on whisky and medical technology," a government spokesperson said.

The British Chamber of Commerce described the new tariffs as a mixed picture, with a welcome confirmation of the removal of U.S. tariffs on whisky, a lower tariff rate than competitors for steel, but a loss in comparative advantage over the EU and other countries for other goods.

International Protests and Exemptions

WIDELY TELEGRAPHED MOVE WITH EXEMPTIONS

The action drew stronger protests from some trade partners.

China said it opposed all unilateral tariffs, adding that trade wars did not serve any parties.

Trump administration officials have told Chinese counterparts they intend to rebuild Trump's second-term tariffs on Chinese goods back up to the 20% that was agreed upon in a trade truce with Chinese President Xi Jinping in November 2025 - but not exceed that level. Prior to Friday's action, China's tariff rate had fallen to 10%, excluding the 25% imposed during Trump's first term on industrial goods.

Australia and Brazil described the new tariffs as unjustified and said they would seek to have them removed, while Norway said there was "no basis" for them. Canada - hit on Monday with new Trump tariffs on $20 billion worth of goods

Key Takeaways

  • New tariffs replace the expiring 10% global levy and are legally rooted in Section 301, seen as more robust after the February Supreme Court rejection of emergency-based tariffs (apnews.com).
  • Economies with partial or committed forced labor prohibitions face 10% tariffs, others face 12.5%, covering 99.4 % of U.S. imports, with targeted exemptions for critical goods (ustr.gov).
  • The move drew criticism from partners like the EU, which questioned the forced labor rationale, while some countries—such as Vietnam—are responding by tightening rules against forced‑labor imports (apnews.com).

References

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the Trump administration impose new forced labor tariffs?
The new tariffs were imposed over concerns of lax enforcement of forced labor bans by 60 trading partners, aiming to correct human rights abuses and unfair trade practices.
Which countries are affected by the new US tariffs?
Sixty trading partners are affected, including the European Union, China, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, the UK, Argentina, Vietnam, and more.
What products are exempt from the new tariffs?
Product exemptions include oil and gas, fertilizer, and certain food items, as specified in the Federal Register notice.
How are the new tariffs structured compared to previous tariffs?
The new tariffs replace a temporary 10% global tariff and are based on Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, with rates of 10% or 12.5% depending on the country.
How have other countries responded to the new US tariffs?
Several countries and the EU have protested, calling the tariffs unjustified or lacking basis, while others, like Canada, have noted their intent to engage in dialogue.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category