GBAF Logo
Global Banking & Finance Awards® 2026 Nominations open, free to enter Nominate now →
Nike shareholders reject climate proposal backed by Norway wealth fund - Finance news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
Finance

Nike shareholders reject climate proposal backed by Norway wealth fund

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on September 8, 2026

3 min read

· Last updated: September 8, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

Nike Shareholders Turn Down Climate Transparency Proposal Despite Norway Support

Shareholder Decisions and Climate Transparency at Nike

By Danielle Kaye

Shareholders Reject Climate Transparency Proposal

NEW YORK, Sept 8 (Reuters) - Nike shareholders have rejected a proposal urging more transparency on its climate goals, including disclosing details on how the sportswear maker intends to reach emissions-reduction targets, the company said on Tuesday.

The shareholder resolution resurfaced questions about the extent to which Nike, which for decades has positioned itself as a climate leader, is prioritizing its environmental targets as it faces financial strain, U.S. political pressure and global regulatory scrutiny of misleading environmental claims.

Nike's Climate Goals and Progress

Oregon-based Nike said in 2019 it aims to reduce its carbon emissions by 65% across its own operations and by 30% across its supply chain by 2030. In a fiscal 2024 update, it said its supply chain emissions had fallen 11% from a 2015 baseline. 

 The company, which has a market capitalization of about $56 billion, did not release shareholder vote tallies.

Norway Wealth Fund's Support

Norway's wealth fund, Nike's 11th-biggest shareholder according to LSEG data, this week said it would back the push for more transparency.

Shareholder Advocacy and Concerns

"It's not that we think Nike is completely dropping the ball here. It's more that we want to know what's really going on," said Giovanna Eichner, shareholder advocate at Green Century Capital Management, which introduced the climate proposal. "It's unclear if there's that same level of commitment toward achieving the goals."

Nike's Reporting and Board's Position

Nike's impact report in 2024 detailed its efforts to use recyclable polyester and rubber and help factories in its supply chain source renewable energy. Last year, details about those climate initiatives were replaced by a list of data points on emissions and waste.

Nike's board urged shareholders to vote against the proposal, arguing in a filing that the company remains committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and management is "best positioned to determine the targets and related disclosures that are appropriate."

Other Shareholder Proposals and Company Performance

Financial Challenges and Leadership

The athletic footwear maker is grappling with slumping sales, eroded market share and a push by CEO Elliott Hill to reinvigorate product innovation nearly two years into his tenure. Shares have fallen about 40% so far this year.

Executive Compensation Vote

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION APPROVED

Shareholders on Tuesday ultimately supported the company's contested proposal to approve executive compensation. Hill's total compensation was more than $36 million for fiscal 2026.

Norway's wealth fund had said it would vote against executives' compensation, arguing that Nike's board "should ensure that all benefits have a clear business rationale." Proxy advisers Glass Lewis and Institutional Shareholder Services had recommended voting against the compensation packages.

Other Failed Proposals

A proposal from a group of conservative investors urging Nike to exclude gender-transition surgery for minors in employee health plans also failed to pass. The resolution, part of a broader campaign against employers, added to scrutiny of Nike over its diversity policies.

(Reporting by Danielle Kaye; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

Key Takeaways

  • Shareholders voted down a proposal urging Nike to disclose how it plans to meet its 2030 climate targets, signaling investor skepticism amid opaque progress.
  • Nike has reduced scope 1 & 2 emissions by 69% and scope 3 (manufacturing/transport) emissions by 36% in FY24—but critics remain unconvinced on its future commitment. (about.nike.com)
  • Norway’s wealth fund, Nike’s 11th‑largest investor by LSEG data, backed the transparency push—highlighting mounting pressure from ESG-focused stakeholders. (investing.com)

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What climate proposal did Nike shareholders reject?
Nike shareholders rejected a proposal urging greater transparency on the company's climate goals and how it would meet emissions-reduction targets.
How much did Nike aim to reduce its supply chain emissions by 2030?
Nike aimed to reduce supply chain emissions by 30% by 2030, with a reported 11% reduction from a 2015 baseline.
Who supported the climate proposal at Nike's shareholder meeting?
Norway's wealth fund, Nike's 11th-biggest shareholder, supported the push for more climate transparency.
Was Nike's executive compensation package approved by shareholders?
Yes, shareholders approved the contested executive compensation package, despite opposition from Norway's wealth fund and some proxy advisers.
Did Nike release the final shareholder vote tally?
No, Nike did not disclose the precise shareholder vote tallies for the climate proposal.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category