GBAF Logo
Global Banking & Finance Awards® 2026 Nominations open, free to enter Nominate now →
Pacific ministers fail to agree on China missile response - Headlines news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
Headlines

Pacific ministers fail to agree on China missile response

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on August 7, 2026

4 min read

· Last updated: August 9, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

Pacific Ministers Struggle to Unite on Response to China’s Missile Launch

By Lucy Craymer and Christine Chen

Pacific Islands Forum Divided Over China’s Missile Test

SUVA, Fiji, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Pacific Island foreign ministers failed to agree on Friday to a joint response to China's missile launch in July, with further discussions expected at the Pacific leaders meeting at the end of August.

China's test-firing of a missile into the Pacific alarmed regional powers but failed to spur a unified response from Pacific Island governments, underscoring divisions over how to confront growing strategic competition in the region.

Concerns Raised by Regional Leaders

Many of the foreign ministers and senior officials from the 18 countries represented at the Pacific Islands Forum meeting in Suva expressed concern to Reuters about the missile test.

Debate Over Joint Statement

Pacific Islands Forum Secretary General Baron Waqa said China's missile test was discussed by ministers "at quite some length". While everyone wanted a statement out, there were disagreements over what it should contain, he said.

"There are mixed feelings on how the statement should be formatted, whether just to make an outright statement particularly on that single incident, but there are other ideas that it should be a general statement covering any tests in the Pacific," Waqa said at a media conference after the meeting.

Disagreements Among Member States

New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters told reporters that two members had refused to sign on to the statement, without giving a clear reason. He would not name the two countries.

An official with knowledge of the discussions said it was Kiribati and Nauru. Kiribati moved to recognise China in 2019 and Nauru followed suit in 2024, severing ties with Taipei.

But Waqa said neither Kiribati nor Nauru blocked the statement.

"They just honestly placed their position so that others can consider and see how best they can all contribute," he said. "So it's not easy, but there's no blocking."  

Next Steps for the Forum

The ministers decided more time was needed to negotiate on the text that could be considered by leaders at the next Pacific Islands Forum leaders meeting in Palau, Deputy Secretary General Esala Nayasi added.

Geopolitical Tensions and Regional Unity

As geopolitical tensions have increased in the region, leaders have called for unity in their response. Pacific leaders backed an "Ocean of Peace" declaration last year to maintain peace amid intensifying strategic competition. However, the lack of a statement shows divisions remain.

China’s Growing Influence in the Pacific

China has expanded its influence in the Pacific in recent years through infrastructure financing, diplomatic outreach and security cooperation, which has prompted concern among traditional partners including Australia, New Zealand and the United States.

External Influences on Pacific Decisions

Peters said some countries were being influenced by those outside the region. He would not name the country he believed was influencing Pacific countries to not sign the statement. 

"The Pacific is a blue continent, peaceful, secure and that our job as the temporary servants serving these people is to make sure it stays that way," he said.

Calls for Regional Solidarity

At the opening of the meeting, Rick Houenipwela, the foreign minister of the Solomon Islands and chair of the meeting, told those gathered that the Pacific's agenda must continue to be "conceived by the Pacific, shaped by the Pacific and only by the Pacific".

Even as the strategic environment became more complex, Houenipwela added, the response should avoid fragmentation or division. 

Instead, he said, it "should create regional solidarity, strong consensus, and continue confidence."

(Reporting by Lucy Craymer and Christine Chen; Editing by Clarence Fernandez, Stephen Coates and Saad Sayeed)

Key Takeaways

  • China test‑fired a long‑range SLBM into the Pacific on July 6, triggering alarm but invoked as routine by Beijing. (csis.org)
  • Some regional powers—Australia, Solomon Islands, Palau and others—publicly condemned the test as destabilising and provocative. (theguardian.com)
  • At the Aug 7 Forum meeting in Suva, foreign ministers could not agree on the wording of a statement; disagreements over form and content postponed action until the leaders’ meeting in Palau. (csis.org)

References

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Pacific Island ministers fail to agree on a response to China’s missile launch?
Pacific Island ministers could not agree due to differing views on how to address the incident and whether to issue a specific or general statement.
Which countries reportedly did not support the joint statement?
Kiribati and Nauru reportedly refused to sign the statement, though they stated their positions without blocking consensus.
What was the main concern discussed regarding China's actions?
Ministers expressed alarm at China's missile test and the growing strategic competition in the Pacific region.
When will further discussions take place on this issue?
Further negotiations are expected at the Pacific Islands Forum leaders meeting at the end of August in Palau.
How has China increased its influence in the Pacific?
China has expanded its influence through infrastructure financing, diplomatic outreach, and security cooperation.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Headlines

Explore more articles in the Headlines category