EU court backs regulators, hands Vivendi defeat in Lagardere antitrust case - Finance news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
Finance

EU court backs regulators, hands Vivendi defeat in Lagardere antitrust case

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on June 3, 2026

2 min read

· Last updated: June 3, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

EU Court Upholds Regulators’ Investigative Rights in Vivendi Lagardere Case

Vivendi’s Challenge to EU Antitrust Investigative Powers

(Corrects first paragraph to say the case is about EU regulators' investigative powers and not Vivendi breaching EU merger rules.)

By Inti Landauro and Makini Brice

Background of the Case

BRUSSELS, June 3 (Reuters) - Vivendi lost its fight against EU antitrust regulators on Wednesday as Europe's second-highest court agreed that they have the power to demand information related to the French publisher's 2023 Lagardere acquisition.

Vivendi’s Arguments

Vivendi had challenged EU Commission' powers to request documents, saying the demands could expose journalists' sources and breach their privacy rights and source-protection rules.

Court’s Ruling

"Since none of the grounds invoked by the applicant are valid, the appeal should be dismissed in its entirety," the Luxembourg-based General Court said.

Vivendi did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Implications and Next Steps

Regulatory Context

The company found itself in the EU regulator's crosshairs after it closed the Lagardere transaction before securing merger approval.

Potential Penalties

The Commission, which acts as the EU competition enforcer, has yet to issue a final decision on the case which could see Vivendi fined as much as 10% of its global annual revenue if found guilty of breaching EU merger rules against gun-jumping.

Recent Enforcement Trends

The EU executive has in recent years slapped hefty fines as a deterrent on companies for violating merger regulations.

Case Reference

The case is T-1097/23 Vivendi v Commission.

(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee, Inti Landauro and Makini BriceEditing by Bernadette Baum)

Key Takeaways

  • The General Court confirmed that EU regulators can demand information in merger probes, even pre‑approval, reinforcing the Commission’s investigatory reach.
  • Vivendi challenged those powers, arguing disclosure could endanger journalistic source protection—but the court found no valid legal basis to curb such requests.
  • The case (T‑1097/23) underscores the broader trend of stringent enforcement of EU merger rules, including potential gun‑jumping fines up to 10% of global turnover.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the EU court rule in the Vivendi Lagardere antitrust case?
The court ruled in favor of EU regulators, confirming their right to demand information from Vivendi regarding its 2023 Lagardere acquisition.
Why did Vivendi challenge the EU Commission's powers?
Vivendi argued that the regulators' information requests could expose journalists' sources and breach privacy and source-protection rights.
What penalties could Vivendi face if found guilty of breaching EU merger rules?
Vivendi could be fined up to 10% of its global annual revenue for violating merger regulations if found guilty.
What is the significance of the T-1097/23 Vivendi v Commission case?
The case clarifies the investigative powers of EU antitrust regulators in demanding documents during merger investigations.
Where did the court proceedings take place?
The case was heard at the General Court based in Luxembourg, with actions by the EU Commission in Brussels.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category