Greenpeace lawsuit against Energy Transfer highlights environmental activism - Global Banking & Finance Review
This image depicts Greenpeace's legal action against Energy Transfer, reflecting the ongoing battle between environmental groups and big corporations. The lawsuit represents a crucial test of new EU laws aimed at protecting activists from harassment.
Finance

Greenpeace files lawsuit against US pipeline company Energy Transfer

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on February 11, 2025

2 min read

· Last updated: February 11, 2025

Add as preferred source on Google

Greenpeace Initiates Legal Action Against Energy Transfer

AMSTERDAM (Reuters) -Greenpeace International has filed a lawsuit against U.S. pipeline company Energy Transfer in a Dutch court, the environmental group said on Tuesday, adding it was the first test of a new European law aimed at curbing lawsuits intended to silence rights activists.

Energy Transfer has been pressing lawsuits in the United States against Greenpeace USA, Greenpeace International, and other environmental groups since 2017, seeking $300 million in damages for activists' attempts to block the Dakota Access Pipeline project.

Greenpeace International said in a statement it would seek to recover "all damages and costs it has suffered as a result of ET's back-to-back, meritless lawsuits."

In 2024 the European Union passed rules aimed at helping journalists, rights activists and public watchdogs defend themselves against lawsuits intended to harass or silence them, including by tying them up in expensive litigation.

Amsterdam-based Greenpeace International said it had filed the suit with the District Court of Amsterdam. It was not immediately clear whether EU and Dutch law would be applicable in the case against Energy Transfer.

Energy Transfer could not immediately be reached for comment.

(Reporting by Toby Sterling, Writing by Charlotte Van Campenhout; Editing by Alison Williams and Nia Williams)

Key Takeaways

  • Greenpeace sues Energy Transfer in Dutch court.
  • First test of new EU law against silencing lawsuits.
  • Energy Transfer seeks $300 million in damages.
  • EU rules protect journalists and activists.
  • Unclear if EU law applies in this case.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main topic?
The main topic is Greenpeace's lawsuit against Energy Transfer in a Dutch court, testing new EU laws.
Why is Greenpeace suing Energy Transfer?
Greenpeace is suing to recover damages from Energy Transfer's lawsuits aimed at silencing them.
What is the significance of the EU law?
The EU law aims to protect journalists and activists from lawsuits intended to harass or silence them.

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category