GBAF Logo
Global Banking & Finance Awards® 2026 Nominations open, free to enter Nominate now →
UK tax authority wins appeal in dispute with Bolt which could affect Uber - Finance news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
Finance

UK tax authority wins appeal in dispute with Bolt which could affect Uber

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on June 12, 2026

2 min read

· Last updated: June 12, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

UK tax authority wins appeal in dispute with Bolt that could affect Uber

Overview of the Bolt and HMRC Tax Dispute

LONDON, June 12 (Reuters) - Britain's tax authority on Friday won an appeal in a dispute with Estonian ride-hailing and food delivery company Bolt, a ruling that could affect rival Uber's similar case worth over £1 billion ($1.3 billion).

Background of the Dispute

Bolt had argued in its £190 million dispute with HM Revenue and Customs that it was liable to charge value added tax of 20% on its margin, rather than on the entire fare charged to customers.

Court of Appeal Ruling

Decision Details

But London's Court of Appeal ruled in HMRC's favour, overturning two lower tribunal decisions. The court said Bolt should not be allowed to use a tax scheme originally designed for tour operators or travel agents, called the Tour Operators Margin Scheme (TOMS).

Implications for Uber

Uber has a similar case pending, which has been on hold while Bolt's case proceeded. A London tribunal said in a ruling last year that Uber had deposited disputed tax sums of £1.446 billion.

Reactions to the Ruling

Bolt's Response

A Bolt spokesperson said the company was disappointed by the ruling and "will consider all options available to us".

HMRC's Response

An HMRC spokesperson said: "We welcome the Court of Appeal's judgment, which confirms our position on the VAT treatment of private hire vehicle operator services of passenger transport."

Exchange Rate Information

($1 = 0.7457 pounds)

Reporting Credits

(Reporting by Sam Tobin. Editing by William James and Mark Potter)

Key Takeaways

  • Court of Appeal ruled in HMRC’s favor, requiring Bolt to apply VAT on margin only, not full fare—potentially affecting Uber’s similar VAT treatment strategy. (cms.law)
  • Uber’s pending appeal on use of the Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme (TOMS) is currently stayed and likely to be heavily influenced by the Bolt judgment. (vatupdate.com)
  • If Uber loses, it may owe substantial additional VAT and face operational changes; if they win, they may reclaim overpaid VAT and continue charging only on margin. (vatupdate.com)

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the dispute between Bolt and the UK tax authority?
Bolt contested HM Revenue and Customs' claim that it owed VAT on the full fare charged to customers, arguing it should only pay VAT on its margin.
How much money was involved in the Bolt VAT dispute?
The dispute involved approximately £190 million ($254.81 million) in VAT liabilities.
What was the outcome of the UK Court of Appeal ruling?
The Court of Appeal ruled in favour of HMRC, overturning two lower tribunal decisions that supported Bolt.
Could this ruling affect other ride-hailing companies like Uber?
Yes, Uber has a similar tax case pending, which has been paused pending the outcome of Bolt's case.
What VAT rate was under consideration in the Bolt case?
A 20% value added tax (VAT) rate was under consideration in the dispute.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category