GBAF Logo
Global Banking & Finance Awards® 2026 Nominations open, free to enter Nominate now →
US weapons makers confront Europe's drive for local control - Finance news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
Finance

US weapons makers confront Europe's drive for local control

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on July 24, 2026

4 min read

· Last updated: July 24, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

US Weapons Makers Grapple with Europe’s Push for Localized Defense Industry

US Defense Companies Face European Demands for Localization and Sovereignty

By Cassell Bryan-Low

LONDON, July 24 (Reuters) - As U.S. defence companies descended on Britain's Farnborough Airshow this week hoping to tap Europe's military spending boom, they encountered increased concern among customers about reliance on American suppliers.

European governments are demanding greater control over defence equipment, more local production and a bigger share of industrial benefits. In response, U.S. arms makers are expanding manufacturing in Europe, forming joint ventures and offering more tailored products.

US Industry Response to European Localization

“We hear loud and clear: Europeans want more sovereignty, and they want more localised capability,” said Daniel Tenney, Lockheed Martin's senior vice president of global business development and strategy.

Localization Pledges and Joint Ventures

LOCALIZATION PLEDGES

With NATO's European members and Canada sharply increasing defence spending, U.S. companies argue it is faster and cheaper to buy proven American systems than develop new ones, while pledging to localise production and technology.

At Farnborough, Lockheed announced a lower-cost Patriot ‌interceptor to be developed with European and U.S. partners. It comes shortly after an announcement about plans to produce an Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) with Germany's Rheinmetall. RTX's Raytheon also recently announced it had partnered with European firms to increase Stinger missile production, including assembly in the Netherlands.

Benefits of Collaborative Defense Systems

Europeans benefit from systems that are widely used, such as the Patriot, where the many countries using it pool funding to support features such as a threat database, said Thomas Laliberty, president of Raytheon's land and air defence systems. “They get a lot of benefit from that collective,” he said. 

Newer defence-tech firms are also making a push. Anduril, which had a major presence at Farnborough for the first time, has expanded its UK workforce and agreed to establish local production of its Barracuda-500M cruise missile in Poland.

“Each government has a different localisation need,” said Anduril UK General Manager Richard Drake.

Europe’s Drive for Defense Independence

Concerns Over US Reliability

EUROPE STRIVES FOR INDEPENDENCE

But some Europeans worry that the U.S. could be less willing or able to provide weapons, parts or other support in the future, including if American defence companies need to prioritise U.S. military needs in other regions.

Technology Transfer and Autonomy

Europeans no longer want finished products, they want access to enough of the underlying technology to build, modify and maintain equipment themselves, industry insiders and specialists say. They want “a significant IP transfer,” said Fabio Dal Pan, a Milan-based senior partner at Boston Consulting Group, a management consulting firm. 

While Europe remains heavily reliant on the U.S. defence industry, the worry for U.S. companies is if the shift towards greater autonomy becomes a long-term trend. That’s “of huge concern,” said Tom Waldwyn, at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, a UK-based think tank. 

Areas of Continued Dependence and Emerging Alternatives

There is some equipment that Europe can’t quickly substitute, such as F-35 fighter jets and Patriot air-defence missile systems.

But in other areas “there are European capabilities that may well be good enough,” and where there is a massive advantage in terms of sovereignty — they may in some cases even be cheaper, said Sash Tusa, an aerospace and defence analyst at UK-based research firm Agency Partners. That includes medium-range air defence missile systems, he added.

European Progress in Defense Technology

Europe is making progress in weaning itself off U.S. equipment in some areas, such as early warning aircraft, analysts say. NATO recently announced a roughly $4.5 billion plan to buy up to 10 ‌Saab GlobalEye surveillance planes to replace aging AWACS early warning aircraft, backing a Swedish system over a rival solution from U.S. planemaker Boeing.

Meanwhile, Europeans are looking to develop some newer technologies themselves. At the airshow, UK-based BAE Systems revealed a new unmanned fighter jet that the British government said it is adopting as its “operational concept demonstrator.” That comes despite a number of U.S. companies already developing similar aircraft, several of which were on display at Farnborough.

UK’s Sovereign Defense Initiatives

Britain’s program will have multiple vendors associated with it but it will be “sovereign,” Air Vice-Marshal Jim Beck, the UK Royal Air Force’s director of capability and programmes, told Reuters last week. “We need the right to do what we want with our kit at the point of our choosing.” 

(Reporting by Cassell Bryan-Low; Editing by Joe Brock and Sharon Singleton)

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. arms makers like Lockheed Martin are introducing lower‑cost Patriot interceptors co‑produced with European partners to align with local sovereignty demands (investing.com)
  • Europe’s drive for a ‘Made in Europe’ defense agenda is backed by initiatives like the ReArm Europe plan and SAFE fund to bolster regional production and reduce U.S. dependency (en.wikipedia.org)
  • While U.S. firms try to maintain market presence by localizing, European governments increasingly require IP transfers, local jobs and partnerships to enhance resilience and control (investing.com)

References

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are European governments seeking more control over defense equipment?
European governments want greater local production, industrial benefits, and sovereignty to ensure strategic independence and reduce reliance on US suppliers.
How are US defense companies responding to Europe's demands?
US firms are expanding manufacturing in Europe, forming joint ventures, localizing products, and partnering with European companies to address sovereignty concerns.
What risks do Europeans see in relying on US defense suppliers?
Europeans worry the US might prioritize its own military needs or become unwilling to provide weapons, parts, or support, jeopardizing Europe's access and independence.
What are examples of European moves toward defense independence?
NATO's selection of Swedish GlobalEye surveillance planes over Boeing and the UK’s new unmanned fighter jet reflect Europe’s efforts to adopt homegrown defense technology.
Why is local production of weapons systems important for Europe?
Local production allows countries to build, maintain, and modify equipment independently, securing supply lines and gaining technological and industrial benefits.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category