GBAF Logo
Global Banking & Finance Awards® 2026 Nominations open, free to enter Nominate now →
Swiss parliamentary committee passes UBS capital concessions - Finance news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
Finance

Swiss parliamentary committee passes UBS capital concessions

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on August 31, 2026

3 min read

· Last updated: August 31, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

Swiss Lawmakers Approve UBS Capital Concessions in New Bank Regulations

Swiss Parliamentary Committee Proposes Compromise on UBS Capital Requirements

By Ariane Luthi

Background on UBS Capital Requirements

BERN, Aug 31 (Reuters) - Swiss lawmakers said on Monday UBS should back its foreign subsidiaries with 50% in Common Equity Tier 1 capital, the highest quality form of bank capital, in a setback for the government, which has sought 100% CET1 backing.  

UBS should be allowed to use cheaper Additional Tier 1 capital to make up the other 50% to achieve full capitalisation of its units abroad, said the economic affairs and taxation committee of the upper house of parliament, looking into banking regulations in the wake of  the collapse of Credit Suisse.

Committee's Rationale and Statements

"This is not a victory for UBS, it's a solution that serves Switzerland," said Committee President Erich Ettlin, a lawmaker with the Centre Party.

Under the committee's proposal, UBS should be able to roughly keep its current CET1 capital level, but the bank would need to hold more AT1 capital, Ettlin said.

Implications of AT1 Capital and Proposed Triggers

AT1 debt is cheaper to hold than CET1 capital and is designed to absorb losses during times of stress, but regulators regard it as less secure.

To strengthen the instrument, the committee proposes to introduce an additional trigger at a level of around 11% CET1 capital ratio.

If the bank falls below that threshold, UBS would have to suspend payouts to investors as well as share buybacks. Bonus payments would need to be reduced unless the bank rebuilds its capital base within a certain time.

The modifications would make AT1 capital more costly for the bank, Ettlin said.

Financial Stability vs Competitiveness

FINANCIAL STABILITY VS COMPETITIVENESS

Lawmakers have tried to balance protecting taxpayers from a future banking crisis against the bank's concerns that tougher capital requirements could undermine its competitiveness, considering several less costly compromise proposals.

The Swiss government wants UBS to hold about $20 billion in additional Common Equity Tier 1 capital to bolster financial stability after its emergency takeover of Credit Suisse in 2023.

But UBS has argued the requirement is excessive, would undermine its competitiveness and damage Switzerland's banking sector.

Legislative Process and Next Steps

The proposals for new banking regulations, which were passed by the committee by 10 votes to two, with one abstention, now have to be voted on in the upper house before being examined by the lower house committee and chamber, where UBS could face a tougher reception.

At the earliest the final decision on the capital requirements could be reached at the end of this year, but it would be more likely in 2027, Ettlin said.

(Reporting by Ariane Luthi, writing by John RevillEditing by Tomasz Janowski and Sanjeev Miglani)

Key Takeaways

  • The upper house economic affairs committee backed a 50/50 CET1–AT1 split for UBS’s foreign subsidiaries instead of the government’s full CET1 requirement — a setback for the executive branch indicating parliamentary compromise. (marketscreener.com)
  • The committee introduced an additional AT1 safeguard: if UBS’s CET1 ratio dips below ~11%, dividend and buyback payouts must be suspended, increasing AT1 capital’s loss-absorbing credibility. (marketscreener.com)
  • The delayed vote timeline suggests final capital rules won’t be ratified until possibly 2027, as the bill still needs to pass both upper and lower houses. (marketscreener.com)

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What has the Swiss parliamentary committee proposed for UBS's foreign subsidiaries?
The committee proposed UBS should back its foreign subsidiaries with 50% in Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital and the remaining 50% with cheaper Additional Tier 1 (AT1) capital.
Why was this proposal seen as a setback for the Swiss government?
The government had sought 100% CET1 backing for UBS's foreign units for greater financial stability, but the proposal allows for less costly AT1 capital to be used.
What additional measure is proposed if UBS's CET1 ratio drops below 11%?
If UBS’s CET1 ratio falls below 11%, the bank must suspend payouts to investors and share buybacks, and reduce bonus payments unless it rebuilds its capital.
When could a final decision on UBS's capital requirements be made?
A final decision could be reached at the end of this year at the earliest, but it is more likely to be in 2027.
How does the committee's proposal balance financial stability and competitiveness?
Lawmakers aimed to protect taxpayers from future crises while considering bank concerns about competitiveness, proposing a compromise between stability and costs.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category