GBAF Logo
Global Banking & Finance Awards® 2026 Nominations open, free to enter Nominate now →
White House turns away CNN, MS NOW, Politico reporters after Trump's ban - Finance news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
Finance

White House turns away CNN, MS NOW, Politico reporters after Trump's ban

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on September 19, 2026

3 min read

· Last updated: September 19, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

White House Bars CNN, MS NOW, Politico Amid Trump’s Press Ban Controversy

White House Press Ban Sparks Media and Constitutional Debate

By Waylon Cunningham

Journalists Denied Access and Press Passes Confiscated

Sept 19 (Reuters) - The White House on Saturday denied access to journalists from CNN, MS NOW and Politico, following through with US President Donald Trump's announcement that he would ban them from the building's grounds. 

All three news outlets separately said their teams' press passes were confiscated on Saturday morning when their journalists went to the White House. They have signaled that they may contest the ban on the grounds that it conflicts with the US Constitution's First Amendment protections for free speech and a free press.

Media Outlets Respond to the Ban

A CNN statement on Saturday called the ban "an illegal assault" on its constitutional right to do journalism without interference from the government. In separate statements, MS NOW and Politico said they would "defend our First Amendment rights."

MS NOW said it intends to "take any and all steps necessary to defend our First Amendment rights and the essential role of independent journalism in our democracy."

CNN and MS NOW said they would continue reporting on the Trump administration, and Politico said it stands by its reporters covering the White House. 

President Trump’s Justification and Accusations of Fake News

A social media post by Trump on Friday accused the outlets of "reporting FAKE NEWS" and said that they "shouldn't be able to constantly write or report FICTION and LIES when they're covering the President of the United States."

He added, "Other Fake News Media Outlets to follow."

Other Media Outlets Potentially Targeted

Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Friday, Trump answered a question about what he meant by other outlets by describing the New York Times and the Washington Post as examples of "fake news," although he did not specifically say he would ban them from the White House.

Reactions from the New York Times and Washington Post

The New York Times in a statement called Trump's latest ban "yet another retaliatory and unconstitutional threat" and said the newspaper "stands in support of the news organizations being unfairly targeted by the president."

The Washington Post in a statement on Saturday said its access to the White House is a "non-negotiable constitutional right," and called the president's actions "a clear form of intimidation meant to silence coverage."

History of Press Restrictions Under Trump Administration

Trump previously has tried to keep certain news outlets or specific journalists out of press gatherings.

Previous Bans and Legal Challenges

Last year he banned the Associated Press from the pool of reporters that cover his movements because the news agency did not adopt Trump's preferred name for the Gulf of Mexico after the president instructed the executive branch to call it the Gulf of America. AP has challenged the ban.

In his first term, Trump's White House sought to revoke or suspend the credentials of Playboy correspondent Brian Karem and CNN's Jim Acosta, but federal judges ordered their ⁠White House press passes restored.

(Reporting by Waylon Cunningham; Editing by Sergio Non, Chizu Nomiyama and Paul Simao)

Key Takeaways

  • Trump’s Truth Social post announced the ban on Sept 18, 2026, citing repeated “fake news” coverage; journalists from the impacted outlets were denied access on Sept 19, 2026. (apnews.com)
  • Media organizations and press‐freedom groups responded strongly: CNN called the ban “an illegal assault” on its First Amendment rights; MS NOW and Politico pledged to defend their constitutional freedoms. (apnews.com)
  • Experts warn the ban is likely unconstitutional. Legal precedent holds that once the White House admits press, it cannot exclude specific outlets due to disagreement with their reporting. (washingtonpost.com)

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the media outlets doing in response to the White House ban?
CNN, MS NOW, and Politico stated they would defend their First Amendment rights and may challenge the ban legally.
Has President Trump previously banned reporters or news outlets?
Yes, Trump has previously sought to bar certain reporters and news outlets, including the Associated Press and individual journalists.
What grounds do the news organizations cite to contest the White House ban?
The news organizations argue that the ban conflicts with the First Amendment protections for free speech and a free press.
How have other major news outlets responded to the ban?
The New York Times and the Washington Post expressed support for the targeted organizations and condemned the White House's actions.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category