GBAF Logo
Global Banking & Finance Awards® 2026 Nominations open, free to enter Nominate now →
Exclusive-US weighs polysilicon price floor, tariffs to counter China in solar and chips - Finance news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
Finance

Exclusive-US weighs polysilicon price floor, tariffs to counter China in solar and chips

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on August 4, 2026

5 min read

· Last updated: August 4, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

Exclusive-US weighs polysilicon price floor, tariffs to counter China in solar and chips

US Polysilicon Tariffs and Price Floor: Policy, Industry Impact, and Reactions

By Nichola Groom

Background and Policy Details

Aug 4 (Reuters) - The Trump administration is preparing to set a price floor and impose tariffs on polysilicon and related products, according to four people familiar with the plan, putting a material critical to solar panels and semiconductors at the center of U.S. efforts to compete with China on artificial intelligence and energy.

The decision, expected to come later this month, aims to protect U.S. polysilicon factories owned by Hemlock Semiconductor and Wacker Chemie from growing Chinese ambitions in the chip supply chain.

President Donald Trump's year-long national security investigation into polysilicon by the Commerce Department also has major implications for the growing domestic solar manufacturing industry at a time when the U.S. leader has rolled back federal support for renewable energy.

Section 232 Investigation and Findings

Details of the probe's findings under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 are being reported for the first time by Reuters, including the Trump administration's plans to pursue a hybrid system combining a minimum import price with tariffs on polysilicon and derivative products, according to the sources familiar with the deliberations, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Industry and Expert Reactions

“China built its polysilicon dominance through subsidies and chronic overcapacity that pushed prices below sustainable levels and weakened competitors," said Craig Singleton, senior fellow at the non-partisan Foundation for Defense of Democracies. "A price floor paired with tariffs could give U.S. producers room to survive, but the policy needs careful calibration so trusted inputs remain available while domestic wafer and cell capacity catches up,” he added.

A White House official would not comment ahead of President Donald Trump's decision. The Commerce Department did not respond to a request for comment.

China's Embassy in Washington criticized the trade investigation.

"China urges the U.S. to stop the Section 232 tariff measures as soon as possible, and properly resolve the concerns of all parties through equal dialogue," a spokesperson said.

Market Impact and Industry Structure

Shares of Corning, Toyo, T1 Energy and other U.S.-listed solar manufacturers including First Solar rallied following the Reuters report. Corning, already up 5.2% before publication, rose to 10% and closed up 9.4%; First Solar rose to 4.7% from 1.8%; T1 Energy climbed to 9.9% from 4.9%; Canadian Solar advanced to a gain of 5.6% from 3%; and Toyo, up about 1% before the story, jumped as high as 5% before ending up 1.7%.

Polysilicon's Role in Solar and Semiconductor Supply Chains

Polysilicon, an ultra-pure form of silicon, sits at the start of the semiconductor and solar manufacturing supply chains. Manufacturers turn silicon wafers into solar cells and then assemble those into panels used in solar projects.

Domestic semiconductor manufacturing, a Trump priority, depends on solar because the solar industry's larger demand for polysilicon helps support production of the material required for chips. The chip industry accounts for 2.4% of global polysilicon demand, the Semiconductor Industry Association said.

"They're finding that they actually do need solar," said Rhone Resch, chief strategy officer at Japan's Toyo Co Ltd, which operates a solar panel factory near Houston and plans to invest $357 million in a nearby solar cell facility.

Importers and Global Manufacturing Capacity

Two of the sources said the Commerce plan will allow importers investing in U.S. wafer and cell production to offset the costs associated with the trade protections. China accounts for roughly 80% of global solar manufacturing capacity.

Legal and Regulatory Context

Under the Cold War-era Section 232 statute, the president can restrict imports deemed a threat to national security after an investigation to confirm a threat exists.

Trump has already completed probes and imposed tariffs on autos, steel, aluminum, copper and lumber. He is expected to soon release the findings of similar investigations into imported drones and industrial robots, which would clear the way for tariffs on those goods.

The administration is also continuing work on closely watched probes into semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, critical minerals and wind turbines as it seeks to rebuild its global tariff regime.

Growth and Challenges in US Solar Manufacturing

U.S. solar manufacturing has expanded since Congress created tax incentives in 2022. Much of that growth, however, has been concentrated in panel assembly, leaving manufacturers dependent on imported wafers and cells, which require longer investment timelines.

Several U.S. solar factory owners, including Toyo, Qcells, Corning, Canadian Solar and T1 Energy, have announced or started facilities farther up the solar supply chain in part to meet stringent Made-in-America requirements tied to federal clean energy subsidies.

Role of Non-Chinese Producers and Domestic Expansion

The trade group Solar Energy Manufacturers for America and a bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers have argued in comments to the Commerce Department that imports from non-Chinese producers like South Korea's OCI Holdings and Wacker, with factories in Malaysia and Germany, will be needed until domestic polysilicon, wafer and cell production expands.

Hemlock, which operates a plant in Michigan, is a joint venture between Corning and Japan's Shin-Etsu Handotai. Munich-based Wacker runs a factory in Tennessee.

"Without polysilicon, the next steps of the value chain (wafer and chips or wafer and solar cells) are not possible," Wacker said in a statement.

Corning declined to comment.

'Collateral Damage' and Industry Concerns

'COLLATERAL DAMAGE'

Balancing Domestic Support and Market Costs

The administration must walk a fine line between supporting domestic producers and inflating the cost of chips and solar panels, products in high demand amid the data center boom.

Industry groups representing solar developers and semiconductor buyers have warned the administration that tariffs could raise the cost of solar power plants and increase prices for products including consumer electronics a

Key Takeaways

  • The Trump administration is preparing to implement a hybrid import control—combining a minimum import price and tariffs—on polysilicon and its derivatives to protect domestic producers such as Hemlock and Wacker Chemie.
  • This measure is part of a broader strategy linking solar and semiconductor industries, as higher polysilicon demand from solar supports chip manufacturing; yet analysts warn it could raise costs for solar projects and consumers.
  • China already dominates global solar manufacturing (~80%) and maintains high retaliatory tariffs on U.S. polysilicon exports; recent reports forecast U.S. solar module prices will remain elevated through 2027 under Section 232 tariffs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the US considering tariffs and a price floor on polysilicon?
The US aims to protect domestic polysilicon factories and support its solar and semiconductor supply chains against growing Chinese manufacturing dominance.
What impact could the tariffs have on the US solar industry?
The tariffs may support domestic manufacturing but could increase costs for solar projects that currently depend on imported wafers and cells.
Which companies are affected by the US polysilicon policy?
US polysilicon factories owned by Hemlock Semiconductor and Wacker Chemie, as well as solar manufacturers like Toyo, Qcells, and Canadian Solar, are directly affected.
How does the trade action relate to US national security?
Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act lets the president restrict imports seen as threats to national security, tying polysilicon to broader tech and energy priorities.
What is China's response to the potential US tariffs on polysilicon?
China's Embassy criticized the investigation and urged the US to stop the Section 232 tariff measures, calling for resolution through dialogue.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category