GBAF Logo
Global Banking & Finance Awards® 2026 Nominations open, free to enter Nominate now →
Exclusive-Some critical mineral firms chosen by EU flag project liquidity concerns - Finance news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
Finance

Exclusive-Some critical mineral firms chosen by EU flag project liquidity concerns

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on September 8, 2026

4 min read

· Last updated: September 8, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

EU-Selected Mineral Project Developers Raise Liquidity and Funding Concerns

Funding Challenges and Strategic Responses in the EU Critical Minerals Sector

Urgent Funding Needs and Liquidity Constraints

LONDON, Sept 8 (Reuters) - Some key critical mineral project developers selected by the EU have called for urgent funding, a document seen by Reuters showed, saying liquidity constraints may put some in jeopardy and limit the bloc's ability to lessen its dependence on China.

The European Union chose 47 projects in Europe in March last year, and 13 more outside the bloc in June 2025, after Beijing imposed export controls on several critical minerals needed for the energy transition, electronics and defence. 

"The goal must be to urgently unlock projects, particularly those working towards final investment decision which face acute liquidity and market pressure and immediate jeopardy," 23 of the 60 projects said last month in an "Urgent Call to Action".

The document did not specify individual companies.

EU’s Financial Framework and Market Conditions

The EU said in response to a query from Reuters that it has put in place a framework to mobilise €1.7 billion ($1.97 billion) in financing for strategic projects since December and was fully aware of challenging market conditions.

A Commission spokesperson told Reuters when asked about the letter containing the document, which was sent to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Stephane Sejourne, the industry commissioner, that Europe was "moving decisively to strengthen its supply of critical raw materials".

It was doing so by "putting in place the framework to identify strategic projects, accelerate permitting and, crucially, mobilise the financing needed to turn these projects into reality", the spokesperson added. 

Comparison with U.S. Critical Mineral Initiatives

Financing issues for EU projects, which are meant to be a key part of its strategy to increase its output of minerals such as lithium, cobalt and rare earths required for developments such as AI data centres and electric vehicles (EVs), contrast sharply with the U.S., which has approved nearly $40 billion in critical mineral deals.

"Fifteen months after the first Strategic Project selection, projects are impacted by unfulfilled commitments on financing, market access and permitting, as well as a lack of vision, strategy and coherence in European approaches," the document sent to the European Commission said. 

Case Study: Viridian Lithium's Collapse

A lack of EU funding had contributed to Viridian Lithium's collapse in March, the French company's former chief commercial officer, Luc Pez, told Reuters, adding: "The selection of Viridian as an EU strategic project was a curse".  

"Our private investors were waiting for Europe to commit to the project, but it never materialised. The numbers were small, but critical," Pez said of the lithium project, which had aimed to supply 10% of the EU's needs of the battery mineral.

Progress and Ongoing Engagement

PROGRESS MADE ON BETTER ENGAGEMENT 

The projects were chosen to help the EU meet targets agreed in its 2024 Critical Raw Materials Act, in which the bloc aims to mine 10%, process 40% and recycle 25% of its needs by 2030.

"The Critical Raw Materials Act is not a funding instrument; however it puts forward several measures to support project development," the EU spokesperson said.

The EU said last year the projects would benefit from streamlined permitting, help with financing and support for selling their output, but in February, the European Court of Auditors said efforts to diversify its imports of critical minerals had "yet to produce tangible results".

Recent Meetings and Future Outlook

At a meeting late last month with Kerstin Jorna, director general of the Commission's GROW department that includes industry, some progress was made on better engagement but no urgent financing solution was proposed, a director of one of the projects who attended the meeting told Reuters.

The director, who declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter, said it was unclear exactly how many projects faced liquidity issues.

"Several projects have already been put on ice, so the promoters decided not to endorse the call to action to avoid attracting further attention," the director said.

Exchange Rate Information

($1 = 0.8613 euros)  

(Reporting by Eric Onstad; Editing by Veronica Brown and Alexander Smith)

Key Takeaways

  • EU has mobilized €1.7 billion for strategic critical mineral projects, but firms warn this may be insufficient amid liquidity constraints (marketscreener.com).
  • EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act targets: mine 10%, process 40%, recycle 25% of needs by 2030—current progress remains weak and heavily reliant on imports, notably from China (investing.com).
  • In contrast, U.S. has approved nearly $40 billion in critical minerals support, including massive loans and programs under the CHIPS Act, highlighting divergence in financing strategies (axios.com).

References

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are EU critical mineral projects raising liquidity concerns?
Many developers face funding constraints and market pressures, risking project progress and increasing EU reliance on imports, especially from China.
What actions has the EU taken to support strategic mineral projects?
The EU has mobilised €1.7 billion in financing and streamlined permitting, but developers say funding and market access remain insufficient.
How has lack of EU funding affected project outcomes?
The lack of secured EU funding contributed to the collapse of projects like Viridian Lithium, whose investors were waiting for EU commitments.
How does EU support for critical minerals compare to the US?
While the US approved nearly $40 billion in mineral deals, EU projects highlight delays and unfulfilled commitments regarding funding and market access.
What targets are set in the EU Critical Raw Materials Act?
By 2030, the EU aims to mine 10%, process 40%, and recycle 25% of its critical raw material needs.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category