World court judges sue Trump administration over sanctions
International Criminal Court Judges Challenge U.S. Sanctions
By Daphne Psaledakis
WASHINGTON, June 24 (Reuters) - Three International Criminal Court judges on Wednesday sued U.S. President Donald Trump and his administration over sanctions imposed on them last year, arguing that the measures were unlawful.
The Lawsuit and Its Claims
In the lawsuit filed in the federal court in Manhattan, judges Kimberly Prost of Canada, Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda and Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini-Gansou of Benin said the sanctions were designed to exert extrajudicial pressure with the objective of punishing and coercing the judges.
White House and State Department Responses
A White House official said Trump lawfully exercised his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) in imposing the sanctions, which the official said dealt with "an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States involving the International Criminal Court, including the ICC's illegitimate and baseless actions targeting America and our close ally Israel."
"The Administration will continue to vigorously defend the President's actions—protecting the national security and foreign policy of our country first and foremost," the official said.
A State Department official declined to comment on pending litigation but said that the ICC continues to "present a threat to our sovereignty and our national interests. The Trump administration will never allow unelected foreign judges to dictate terms to the United States."
Background on the Sanctions
The Trump administration imposed sanctions on several judges at the International Criminal Court last year in an unprecedented retaliation over the war tribunal's issuance of an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and a past decision to open a case into alleged war crimes by U.S. troops in Afghanistan.
Impact of Sanctions
Sanctions severely hamper individuals' abilities to carry out even routine financial transactions as any banks with ties to the U.S., or that conduct transactions in dollars, are expected to have to comply with the restrictions.
The International Criminal Court: Jurisdiction and Recognition
The ICC, which was established in 2002, has international jurisdiction to prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in member states or if a situation is referred by the U.N. Security Council.
Although the ICC has jurisdiction over war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide in its 125-member countries, some nations, including the U.S., China, Russia and Israel, do not recognize its authority.
History of U.S. Opposition to the ICC
The Trump administration's dislike of the court goes back to Trump's first term. In 2020, Washington imposed sanctions on then-prosecutor Fatou Bensouda and one of her top aides over the court's work on Afghanistan.
Judges Challenge Legal Basis of Sanctions
Arguments Presented in the Lawsuit
The lawsuit argues that the sanctions were against the law as they exceeded the scope of IEEPA and were not based on a genuine national emergency or extraordinary threat.
Alleged Effects on Judges
"The Sanctions Regime ... is designed to exert extra-judicial pressure on these judges and their colleagues on the ICC bench by targeting their financial and other personal interests, with the objective of punishing them for prior judicial decisions and coercing them into prioritizing their private interests over deciding cases on the basis of the law and facts," the lawsuit said.
"Being subjected to such sanctions under IEEPA is tantamount to the financial death penalty. Due to the sanctions, Judges Prost, Bossa, and Alapini-Gansou are no longer able, among other things, to use credit cards; access banking services; use common online platforms, such as Amazon and Google; book travel; and in some cases, obtain health insurance," it said.
The judges also said that the sanctions bar the submission of evidence and argument in any pending or future proceedings before them.
(Reporting by Daphne Psaledakis in Washington; Editing by Matthew Lewis and Mark Porter)
