GBAF Logo
Global Banking & Finance Awards® 2026 Nominations open, free to enter Nominate now →
Meta challenges UK online safety watchdog over how fees and fines are calculated - Finance news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
Finance

Meta challenges UK online safety watchdog over how fees and fines are calculated

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on October 13, 2026

3 min read

· Last updated: October 13, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

Meta Takes Ofcom to UK High Court Over Online Safety Act Penalties and Fees

By Paul Sandle

Meta Challenges Ofcom's Fee and Fine Calculations Under the Online Safety Act

LONDON, Oct 13 (Reuters) - Facebook and Instagram owner Meta challenged Britain's media regulator on Tuesday over how it calculates fees and potential fines under the Online Safety Act, arguing that the watchdog's methods are disproportionate.

Overview of the Online Safety Act and Ofcom's Powers

The 2023 law allows Ofcom to impose fines of up to 10% of qualifying worldwide revenue, or £18 million ($23.9 million), whichever is greater, and to recover the costs of running its regime through fees calculated by reference to revenue.

Recent Investigations Into Meta

Meta's challenge comes a week after Ofcom opened an investigation into whether the company properly assessed the risks posed by its Instagram Instants feature before launching it in May.

Details of Meta's Legal Challenge

The case brought by Meta opened in London's High Court on Tuesday and centres on Ofcom's use of worldwide rather than UK revenue to determine fees and maximum potential fines.

Meta's Arguments Against Ofcom

Meta argued that Ofcom had exceeded its statutory powers by defining qualifying worldwide revenue as broadly as possible, with the objective of imposing the highest possible penalties.

Meta's Legal Submission

That was Ofcom's "overriding concern", Meta said in its legal submission.

Joint Liability and Fee Calculation

Meta is also challenging Ofcom's method of calculating fines where two or more providers owned by the same organisation are found jointly liable for breaches.

Ofcom's Response to Meta's Claims

Ofcom argues that its approach is proportionate and that it has struck a "careful balance" in defining qualifying revenue. Its court submission said that qualifying worldwide revenue was used only to calculate the maximum potential penalty and that any actual fine must be proportionate to the failure.

Broader Industry Context and Ongoing Disputes

Meta is also fighting Ofcom on other fronts. It joined TikTok and X in a separate legal hearing last week over the amount of information the regulator is demanding.

Meta's Commitment and Industry Perspective

Meta said it was committed to cooperating constructively with Ofcom.

"However, we and others in the tech industry believe its decisions on the methodology to calculate fees and potential fines are disproportionate," a Meta spokesperson said.

"We believe fees and penalties should be based on the services being regulated in the countries they're being regulated in. This would still allow Ofcom to impose the largest fines in UK corporate history."

Ofcom's Position on Regulation

Ofcom said it had been tasked with regulating an industry that had been unregulated and unaccountable for more than 20 years.

An Ofcom spokesperson said Meta's case was one of a number of legal challenges it faced. 

"On all these fronts, we will robustly defend our reasoning and decisions," the spokesperson said.

($1 = 0.7547 pounds)

(Reporting by Paul SandleEditing by David Goodman)

Key Takeaways

  • Meta’s legal action centers on Ofcom’s use of qualifying worldwide revenue (QWR) to calculate both fees and maximum fines under the Online Safety Act, arguing this overly broad definition inflates penalties. (theguardian.com)
  • Ofcom defends its approach as proportionate and balanced, noting that QWR is only used to set the penalty cap, while any actual fine must be proportionate to the breach. (ofcom.org.uk)
  • The substantive hearing commenced in London’s High Court on October 13, 2026, with key third-party interventions: child safety group 5Rights backing Ofcom, and Epic Games and CCIA supporting Meta’s UK-only revenue stance. (mlex.com)

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Meta challenging in the UK High Court?
Meta is challenging Ofcom's method of calculating fees and potential fines under the UK Online Safety Act, arguing the approach is disproportionate.
How does Ofcom calculate fines under the Online Safety Act?
Ofcom can impose fines up to 10% of qualifying worldwide revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater, and uses worldwide, not just UK, revenues.
Why does Meta disagree with Ofcom's fee calculation?
Meta believes Ofcom's use of worldwide revenue exceeds its statutory powers and leads to excessively high penalties, rather than being proportionate.
What additional legal actions has Meta taken against Ofcom?
Meta has also joined TikTok and X in challenging Ofcom over its information demands in a separate legal hearing.
What is Ofcom's defense for its calculation methods?
Ofcom states its method is proportionate and that actual fines must be reasonable relative to any regulatory failure.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category