Austrian supreme court rules against Ryanair add-on fees - Finance news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
Finance

Austrian supreme court rules against Ryanair add-on fees

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on June 29, 2026

2 min read

· Last updated: June 29, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

Austrian Supreme Court Declares Several Ryanair Add-On Fees Unlawful

Overview of the Austrian Supreme Court Ruling Against Ryanair

Background of the Case

June 29 (Reuters) - Low-cost carrier Ryanair lost a case before Austria's Supreme Court over some of its passenger fees including a charge for airport check-in, the Austrian Consumer Information Association said on Monday.

Austria is the latest country to rule against some of Ryanair's charges. Last week, the airline said it would remove charges for parents to sit with their children after the British competition watchdog launched an inquiry into the policy.

Details of the Court Decision

Unlawful Clauses Identified

The Austrian court ruled on May 14 that 14 clauses in Ryanair's terms and conditions are unlawful, the consumer group, known as VKI, said. VKI had brought the case on behalf of the Austrian government.

Specific Fees Targeted

The ruling concerns fees including a €55 ($63) airport check-in charge, €15 for printing a boarding pass, a €25 infant fee and a name-change fee of up to €160. The court said it was problematic that some charges could also apply in situations where the airline might be at fault.

Transparency and Consumer Protection

"The Supreme Court made clear that additional charges must be transparent and must not unfairly disadvantage consumers," Petra Leupold, head of VKI's legal department, said.

Potential Impact for Passengers

VKI said the decision could open the door for passengers to reclaim fees already paid.

Ryanair's Response and Next Steps

Company's Position

Ryanair rejected parts of the consumer group's interpretation and said the court had not declared its pricing model unlawful nor ordered retroactive reimbursements. A spokesperson said that VKI had been unsuccessful with such claims in two lower courts.

Implementation of the Ruling

The court requires Ryanair to stop using the contested clauses in Austria within three months.

Additional Information

($1 = 0.8760 euros)

(Reporting by Alexandra Schwarz-Goerlich, writing by Cian Muenster; Editing by Susan Fenton)

Key Takeaways

  • Austria’s Supreme Court declared 14 clauses in Ryanair’s terms unlawful, targeting fees like airport check‑in (€55), boarding‑pass printing (€15), infant fee (€25) and high name‑change charges—citing intransparent and unfair practices.
  • The ruling opens the possibility for passengers to reclaim already‑paid fees, although Ryanair disputes that the decision mandates reimbursement or invalidates its overall pricing model.
  • This adds to growing scrutiny of Ryanair: in the UK, the Competition and Markets Authority has launched an investigation into its controversial 'mandatory family seat' charge (around £8), prompting Ryanair to later offer free parent‑child seating.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Ryanair fees were ruled unlawful by the Austrian Supreme Court?
The court ruled airport check-in, boarding pass printing, infant, and name-change fees, among others, to be unlawful.
Who brought the case against Ryanair in Austria?
The case was brought by the Austrian Consumer Information Association (VKI) on behalf of the Austrian government.
Could passengers reclaim Ryanair fees after this ruling?
VKI stated the decision could allow passengers to reclaim fees already paid to Ryanair.
Did the court declare Ryanair’s entire pricing model unlawful?
No, Ryanair said the court did not declare its entire pricing model unlawful or order retroactive reimbursements.
How long does Ryanair have to comply with the Austrian court’s ruling?
Ryanair must stop using the contested clauses in Austria within three months.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category