Eswatini Rapidly Accepted Trump's Migrant Deportee Program Despite Legal Hurdles
Eswatini's Decision and Its Implications
By Tim Cocks
MBABANE, May 21 (Reuters) - Upon learning through the U.S. embassy that President Donald Trump was looking for African nations to take in deported third-country migrants, Eswatini was one of the first to volunteer despite questions over the legality of the program.
According to three senior government sources briefed on the matter, Prime Minister Russell Dlamini met then-Acting U.S. Charge d'Affaires Caitlin Piper in mid-February last year to discuss the matter in private.
Dlamini took the proposal to King Mswati III, who marked 40 years on the throne of the mountainous southern African nation in April. Mswati listened and immediately agreed to host the deportees, two of the sources said, describing previously unreported closed-door talks.
The speed of the agreement, under which 19 migrants have been detained in a prison south of the capital Mbabane so far, reflects how keen Eswatini was to keep its U.S. partner happy.
"The king embraced the deal as Eswatini's contribution to world order," King Mswati's spokesperson, Percy Simelane, told Reuters of the decision.
The U.S. was Eswatini's largest single external donor in 2024, according to U.S. Official Development Assistance figures, with a large share of aid going towards HIV/AIDS programmes. The landlocked kingdom of 1.2 million people has one of the highest rates of HIV in the world.
In return for hosting up to 160 deportees, Eswatini - where a third of the population live below the $2.15-a-day World Bank poverty line - was to be paid $5.1 million, according to a leaked copy of the deal seen by Reuters.
Legal and Political Controversy
Lawyers Challenge Legality of Deal
LAWYERS CHALLENGE LEGALITY OF DEAL
However, the accord to take in the deportees from nations ranging from Cuba and Jamaica to Cambodia and Laos has proved controversial, despite the extensive powers of the king, sparking unusual public protest.
There were small yet rare protests in July outside the prison where the deportees reside. Two lawyers are challenging the deal's legality in local courts, saying it violates Eswatini's constitution in several ways.
These include bypassing parliament and holding the deportees without charge - the constitution says they must be released after 48 hours - refusing to grant them access to a lawyer and the fact they have committed no crime on Swazi soil.
"The government of Swaziland (Eswatini) have put themselves in a mess that they don't know how to take themselves out of," the lawyer for the deportees, Sibusiso Nhlabatsi, told Reuters.
"Swaziland (Eswatini) is regarded as a golden boy in Africa," by the U.S., Nhlabatsi said. "I think we found ourselves in the good books ... (and) wanted to stay there."
After months of trying, Nhlabatsi won a court case on April 10 giving the detainees the right to counsel, but the prison authorities have yet to grant access, he said.
Eswatini's correctional services head did not respond to a request for comment.
Operation Kept Highly Secret
OPERATION KEPT HIGHLY SECRET
A U.S. State Department spokesperson declined to answer specific questions, but said "we remain unwavering in our commitment to end illegal and mass immigration and bolster America's border security".
In July last year, the first five deportees arrived. Successive waves have brought 19 so far, two of whom have been released and repatriated.
According to the three government and three diplomatic sources, only the king, Queen Mother Ntfombi and Prime Minister Dlamini knew about the deal until the migrants touched down.
"Bringing USA deportees to Eswatini (concerned) security. It had to start where it started and the rest of the system structures were to learn of the decision later," said Simelane.
Two of the diplomatic and one government source said when the $5.1 million arrived in state coffers, no one, including the finance minister, knew what it was for.
Simelane declined to comment.
U.S. Relations and Economic Impact
Favourable U.S. Tariffs and Healthcare Deal
FAVOURABLE U.S. TARIFFS AND HEALTHCARE DEAL
Unlike neighbouring South Africa, Eswatini has maintained good relations with the U.S. and the country received relatively generous terms under a health agreement signed with Washington in December, helping prop up a creaking healthcare system.
Of 14 African countries that signed bilateral U.S. health deals in December to replace dismantled USAID, Eswatini got the highest per capita spend of $205 million. It also got tariffs of 10%, a third of those imposed on South Africa.
"The MOU had a significant impact," health portfolio committee head Nxumalo Somntongo told Reuters, referring to the December health deals. He said they had made financing more sustainable and supply chains more reliable.
However, three sources, and Nxumalo, said they knew of no evidence that reinstating aid, or offering Eswatini favourable trade tariffs, was discussed as part of the deportee deal.
"To the best of our knowledge, no carrot, in the form of tariffs was dangled. Health aid was going on long before the deal and could not have been bait," Simelane said.
Human Impact and Conditions
Difficult Conditions for Deportees
DIFFICULT CONDITIONS
For some detainees and relatives, it's been a nightmare.
Pheap Rom from Cambodia, one of the two detainees to be released, panicked when he realised he was going to an African country rather than another U.S. ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) facility.
"I was (so) scared, my knees were shaking," he told Reuters last month in Phnom Penh.
The conditions in the prison in Eswatini were crowded, he said, with four people to a small cell.
The long-term partner of another deportee still in Eswatini, Felix Perez, 64, described most of their phone conversations as being about fears he might die in jail owing to poor health.
"It's a thought I can't shake," the woman, who gave her name as Phyllis, told Reuters in a text message from her Louisiana home town. "To kno
