Headlines
UK PM gives full backing to Reeves after tearful appearance in parliament
Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on July 2, 2025
3 min readLast updated: January 23, 2026
Global Banking & Finance Review®
Company
Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on July 2, 2025
3 min readLast updated: January 23, 2026
UK PM Keir Starmer supports Rachel Reeves after emotional parliament session amid welfare reform controversies, affecting markets.
By Andrew MacAskill and Alistair Smout
LONDON (Reuters) -British Prime Minister Keir Starmer's office rushed to give finance minister Rachel Reeves his full backing on Wednesday after she appeared in tears in parliament following a series of U-turns on welfare reforms that blew a hole in her budget plans.
Reeves looked exhausted and appeared to brush away tears during the half-hour session of Prime Minister's Questions in the House of Commons on Wednesday. Her spokesperson said it was a personal matter.
British borrowing costs rose and the pound stumbled as the weekly question-and-answer session unfolded on TV, with market analysts saying the moves reflected fears that Reeves would be replaced, throwing the government into further turmoil.
Asked about Reeves, a Treasury spokesperson said: "It's a personal matter, which - as you would expect - we are not going to get into."
Starmer's press secretary told reporters: "The chancellor is going nowhere, she has the prime minister's full backing."
The pressure on Reeves comes after the government managed to pass its welfare reform bill, but only after it removed measures that would have led to savings in the long run.
Reeves has repeatedly emphasised her commitment to self-imposed fiscal rules, limiting the amount Britain will borrow to try to build the confidence of investors.
But that ambition collided with Labour members of parliament who were opposed to the scale of the cuts to welfare, and who said Reeves was being cruel in pushing for billions of pounds of savings from some of the most vulnerable people in society.
Opposition politicians and economists said the decision to sharply scale back the welfare reforms meant the government would have to raise taxes or cut spending elsewhere to balance the public finances in the annual budget later this year.
LOOKING MISERABLE
The opposition Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch singled out Reeves during the weekly set-piece parliamentary session, in which lawmakers put questions to the prime minister in often-raucous exchanges, saying: "She's pointing at me, she looks absolutely miserable."
Reeves animatedly gestured back.
Badenoch said: "She is a human shield for his incompetence. In January, he said that she would be in post until the next election. Will she really?"
Starmer then responded that Badenoch would not be in her job by then, but declined to explicitly back Reeves.
The appearance of Reeves in tears put British government bonds on track for their biggest daily selloff since October 10, 2022, when financial markets were still reeling from former Prime Minister Liz Truss's decision to announce big, unfunded tax cuts. The pound fell almost 1% on Wednesday.
Starmer's press secretary later said the prime minister had expressed his confidence in Reeves many times and did not need to repeat it every time a political opponent speculated on her position.
The Treasury spokesperson said Reeves would be working out of Downing Street on Wednesday afternoon.
Asked if Reeves had offered her resignation, Starmer's press secretary said: "no".
(Reporting by Alistair Smout, Andrew MacAskill and Elizabeth Piper; Editing by Kate Holton and Alex Richardson)
Rachel Reeves appeared in tears during a session of Prime Minister's Questions, which was described as a personal matter by her spokesperson.
Keir Starmer's press secretary stated that Reeves has the Prime Minister's full backing and is not going anywhere.
British borrowing costs rose and the pound stumbled as market analysts expressed fears that Reeves might be replaced.
Reeves is facing pressure from Labour MPs who oppose the scale of cuts to welfare, arguing that her fiscal rules are too harsh.
The government passed its welfare reform bill but had to remove measures that would have led to long-term savings.
Explore more articles in the Headlines category
