Swatch claiming $170 million in damages against Samsung over trademark infringement, FT reports - Finance news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
Finance

Swatch claiming $170 million in damages against Samsung over trademark infringement, FT reports

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on June 26, 2026

2 min read

· Last updated: June 26, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

Swatch Seeks $170 Million in Damages Against Samsung for Trademark Infringement

Legal Battle Between Swatch and Samsung Over Trademark Infringement

Background of the Lawsuit

June 26 (Reuters) - Swiss watchmaker Swatch is seeking $170 million in damages in a lawsuit against Samsung in which it claims the South Korean electronics giant allowed digital clones of Swatch watches on Samsung smartwatches, the Financial Times reported on Friday citing court documents.

High Court Ruling and Trademark Infringement

Findings of Liability

A British judge is expected to rule on damages soon after the High Court in London in 2022 found Samsung liable for trademark infringement over third-party apps available on Samsung smartwatches. The apps enabled users to replicate popular models by Swatch-owned brands including luxury labels Omega and Tissot.

International Implications

The court case, which began in 2019 before Britain's official exit from the European Union, also relates to infringement in the bloc. The upcoming ruling is also expected to clear the way for a parallel Swatch claim against a Samsung subsidiary in the U.S., according to the FT.

Impact on the Watch Industry

Smartwatch Market Competition

The Swiss watch industry faces a growing threat from the fast-developing market for smartwatches, with companies like Samsung, Apple and Huawei among major producers.

Statements from Swatch and Samsung

Arguments Presented to the Court

The FT said representatives of Swatch and Samsung have filed written statements to the High Court which is now determining damages. In the reported statements, Swatch accused Samsung of "large-scale appropriation" of "valuable and carefully protected" trademarks, while Samsung called the demands "extravagant" and outsized.

Official Responses

A spokesperson for Swatch said the group would not comment on the ongoing legal procedure. Samsung did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

Swatch’s Position in the Connected Watch Market

Product Range and Strategy

Swatch, whose groups produce timepieces ranging from affordable plastic watches to luxury models worth tens of thousands of dollars, sells connected watches such as the SwatchPAY! but has so far not launched any smartwatches itself.

Reporting Credits

(Reporting by Alessandro Parodi in Gdansk and Marleen Kaesebier in Zurich; Editing by Susan Fenton)

Key Takeaways

  • Swatch alleges approximately 26 infringing digital watch faces were downloaded around 160,000 times across the UK and EU, calling them "cheap copies" of its designs between October 2015 and February 2019 (zonebourse.com).
  • The UK High Court ruled against Samsung in 2022, a decision upheld by the Court of Appeal in 2023, rejecting Samsung’s ‘mere hosting’ defense and affirming liability even for third-party app infringement (zonebourse.com).
  • Swatch’s $170 million damages claim could unlock a similar case against a Samsung subsidiary in the U.S., depending on the upcoming UK damages ruling (zonebourse.com).

References

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Swatch suing Samsung?
Swatch claims Samsung allowed third-party apps on its smartwatches that replicated Swatch's watch faces, infringing on its trademarks.
How much is Swatch seeking in damages from Samsung?
Swatch is seeking $170 million in damages for trademark infringement related to digital clones of its watches.
Where is the Swatch vs. Samsung court case taking place?
The case is being decided by the High Court in London, with additional claims possible in the US.
Which Swatch-owned brands were affected by the infringement?
The affected brands include Swatch's luxury labels such as Omega and Tissot.
What was Samsung's response to Swatch's claims?
Samsung described Swatch's demands as 'extravagant' and outsized in statements to the High Court.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category