Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on February 2, 2025
3 min readLast updated: January 26, 2026
Add as preferred source on Google
US activist Boaz Weinstein challenges UK's $333 billion trust sector, pushing for performance improvements and governance changes.
By Sinead Cruise, Nell Mackenzie and Iain Withers
LONDON (Reuters) - U.S. activist investor Boaz Weinstein may have suffered a defeat in the first vote on his plans to shake up Britain's investment trust industry, but bosses in the 269 billion-pound ($333 billion) sector will not be sleeping easy.
Weinstein's Saba Capital Management wants to seize control of seven trusts it owns sizeable stakes in, after accusing the 160-year-old sector of widespread underperformance, which the trusts reject.
In an initial salvo, shareholders in Herald Investment Trust, the largest of the seven, voted decisively against Saba's bid to unseat its board last week.
Next up are Baillie Gifford U.S. Growth Trust and Keystone Positive Change Investment Trust, which hold votes on Monday. Three others follow on Tuesday and Wednesday.
"Boards and managers have to take note as any trust languishing with a liquid portfolio on a wide discount without any discount control mechanism is vulnerable," said Daniel Lockyer, Hawksmoor Investment Management senior fund manager.
Investment trusts are listed vehicles that individuals can buy shares in to gain exposure to assets, from listed stocks to hard-to-access private companies.
Their shares should trade broadly in line with the net value of their assets (NAVs). But trust shares can fall out of favour, creating big gaps between share prices and NAVs, and leaving investors unable to cash out without leaving value behind.
Win or lose, Saba's battle looks likely to mean more pressure on trusts to improve their performance.
"Saba's campaign has already set a powerful precedent," said Sonia Falconieri, professor of finance at London's Bayes Business School. "The message is clear: performance and governance will remain under intense scrutiny."
WEINSTEIN SEEKS TO MERGE TRUSTS, BUY BACK SHARES
A Reuters analysis of the seven targeted trusts' most recent accounts - filed between April and November last year - shows a 350-million pound total shortfall between the value of the shares at the filing date and the 3.9-billion pound book value of the assets the trusts held.
While those figures only capture a snapshot in time, the filings show discounts are persistent.
Trusts say they have delivered respectable long-term performance, that trading improved in 2024, and that they are taking action to close discounts. They call Saba's campaign self-serving.
Weinstein has vowed to fix performance by merging unpopular trusts, buying back shares, and investing in more private assets rather than large listed stocks.
In an interview before Herald's vote, Weinstein, who agreed a standstill this month in a long-running battle with dozens of BlackRock trusts, told Reuters he was preparing for the long haul.
"If we lose narrowly, we may win in some period not that far thereafter," he said, adding that at least two institutional investors had handed him fresh cash since his campaign went public late 2024. He declined to name them.
In the meantime, trusts are trying to rally shareholders.
Edinburgh Worldwide Investment Trust's Chair Jonathan Simpson-Dent accepts discounts have widened. But he said the sector was already focused on fixing it.
($1 = 0.8070 pounds)
(Editing by Tommy Reggiori Wilkes and Emelia Sithole-Matarise)
The article discusses US activist Boaz Weinstein's campaign to improve performance in the UK's investment trust sector.
Saba Capital Management seeks to merge trusts, buy back shares, and invest in private assets to improve performance.
They face scrutiny due to alleged underperformance and large discounts between share prices and NAVs.
Explore more articles in the Finance category
