eLearningClasses.com
Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

POOR CUSTOMER SERVICE IS ERODING CUSTOMER LOYALTY TO RETAIL BRANDS

Complaints from “Under 35” Age Group are Taken Less Seriously, Resulting in Younger Consumers Shopping Around

New research commissioned by customer service specialists KANA® Software, A Verint® Company (NASDAQ: VRNT), suggests poor customer service is eroding consumer loyalty and confidence in retail brands.

Nearly one-third of U.K. consumers (30 percent) have become less loyal to retail brands in the past five years, according to a survey of 2,000 consumers carried out by Vision Critical on behalf of KANA. One-quarter of those customers identified poor service as the main reason for this decreased loyalty.

One major issue for customers was the number of times they had to repeat their complaint to different people within the same company. Almost half of respondents (48 percent) said they had to repeat information during their last communication with a retailer.

All age groups identified repetition as a problem; however, it occurs most frequently for customers under the age of 35—with one in 20 repeating themselves at least five times. Only 30 percent of these younger customers had their issue resolved after one interaction. By contrast, 64 percent of customers over the age of 65 did not have to repeat their complaint at all, feeling satisfied after first contact.

This apparent disparity between levels of service has the potential to drive younger consumers elsewhere. Of those who feel less loyal to retail brands, 37 percent of 18-to-24-year-olds cite service as the key factor versus just 20 percent of those aged 65 and older.

“By forcing consumers to repeat themselves, often several times over a prolonged period, organisations not only deliver inefficient service that costs them money—they seriously affect future consumer loyalty,” says Steven Thurlow, head of worldwide product strategy for KANA. “The need for repetition shows not only poor management of customer data, channels and context, but more fundamentally a lack of ownership of the consumer’s problem and lack of appreciation for their effort levels.”

“The younger generation has higher expectations of digital channels, collaborative and social communications and asks ‘how hard can it be.’ They won’t take seriously an organisation that is unable to do the basics right, and these expectations are rising all the time,” Thurlow continues.

In the past six months, more than one-in-10 adults polled have used at least five different customer channels to contact a retailer. This research supports other studies from KANA showing that U.K. consumers regularly use multiple different channels of contact. Web-based chat, email and face-to-face in store came out as the most popular choices for customer engagement with preference varying between age groups.

“When you have an issue, you want to speak to someone who knows your back history and is able to take action on your behalf. Repetition causes frustration and makes customers feel devalued or, worse, completely ignored. Without a true sense that different channels of communication are linked, people feel that they are wasting their time and, ultimately, this leads to an erosion of loyalty in the retail brand,” Thurlow adds.