Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

BURFORD CAPITAL RECEIVES $26 MILLION FROM INNOVATIVE CORPORATE DEBT FACILITY BACKED BY ARBITRATION CLAIM

Ground-breaking use of pending claim to drive down corporate borrowing costs expands potential of litigation finance market

Burford Capital Limited, the world’s largest provider of investment capital and risk solutions for litigation, today announces that it received $26 million in proceeds from an innovative transaction where Burford* provided a corporate debt facility linked to an arbitration claim.   Burford’s counterparty was Rurelec PLC, a publicly-traded owner, operator and developer of power generation capacity internationally.

Burford’s 2012 facility permitted Rurelec to monetize the value of its arbitration claim and use that value to obtain a conventional, fully recourse loan from Burford at a lower interest rate than would otherwise have been available to Rurelec in the debt markets.  Rurelec used the Burford facility to expand its business while it awaited the outcome of its arbitration.

Chris Bogart
Chris Bogart

Commenting on the transaction, Rurelec’s Chairman Colin Emson said:  “We were able to use a pending arbitration claim to obtain innovative corporate financing from Burford that lowered our cost of capital and helped our business expand.  The Burford team was smart, fast and decisive.  The ability to monetize a pending claim is something that we could only have achieved with Burford.”

The Rurelec transaction was profitable for Burford, which earned an $11 million net profit on a $15 million investment, generating a 73% return and a 34% IRR.   However, what is noteworthy about this transaction is its innovative structure.

Litigation finance is often thought of as non-recourse financing to pay the costs of bringing a piece of litigation.  The reality is considerably broader and more diverse, and Burford deploys capital in many different ways, all centered around evaluating and monetizing a contingent litigation asset.

In this case, Rurelec was pursuing an arbitration claim against Bolivia for the expropriation of one of Rurelec’s power plants.  Rurelec did not need capital to pay its lawyers.  Rather, it needed capital to continue to grow its business – but lenders wanted very high interest rates.  Unlike a traditional lender, Burford was able to evaluate the value of Rurelec’s pending arbitration claim, and thus was able to provide the following facility:

  • A fully recourse, secured $15 million senior loan at a 12% capitalized interest rate
  • A contingent value right to receive a portion of the ultimate arbitration award, expressed on a sliding scale based on time and amount

Rurelec then won its claim, extracted payment from Bolivia, and paid off Burford.
The result was that Rurelec received the capital it needed at a reasonable price, and was able to monetize a contingent asset (its arbitration claim) for which its lenders and shareholders were not giving it financial credit.  Meanwhile, Burford was able to earn appealing returns in a transaction with lower risk of loss by putting its specialized expertise to work.

Burford is not usually permitted under the terms of its agreements with its counterparties to make any sort of public announcement or disclosure about individual investments.  However, Rurelec’s own disclosure obligations and its consent make this exception possible.

Burford is pleased to be able to share the details of this transaction publicly, both to advance understanding of the reality of litigation finance and to encourage other creative lawyers, bankers and financial managers to pursue the monetization of pending claims.

Christopher Bogart, Burford’s CEO, commented: “Litigation finance is too often thought of in its most basic form, which does not reflect the range of innovative investment structures we are able to utilise.  In this case, by recognising and assigning value to a pending arbitration claim, Burford was able to structure an investment which allowed Rurelec to pursue its expansion.  This is a good demonstration that the benefits of litigation finance go far beyond that of simply helping to pay legal fees, and in many cases can provide an effective alternative method of financing to help companies achieve their strategic goals.”

Rurelec was represented by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer in the arbitration proceeding and by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom in the financing transaction.  Burford performed its own internal evaluation of the arbitration claim with its own experienced team, and was represented by Latham & Watkins in the financing transaction.