Nick Tate, Chief Growth Officer,Verbalisation
The average age of high net-worth individuals (HNWIs) is changing. And with it their collective perceptions of, and behaviour towards, private banking and wealth management. But how are private banks and wealth managers changing their behaviours to pattern match this new breed? A CapGemini’s 2016 study stated:
“ More HNWI wealth (35%) was essentially liquid, held in bank accounts or as physical cash, compared to 32% that was overseen by wealth managers. Under-40 HNWIs were even less likely to turn to wealth managers (28%)”
That’s an alarming fact.
Why? Because in the crucial search for lifetime customer value, it seems younger HNWIs are being turned off by more traditional solutions and embracing technology. Undoubtedly, this represents a challenge for the private wealth service sector. If it’s to survive and thrive moving forward, it’s crucial to disrupt itself, but that doesn’t start with technology. It starts with really understanding the customer.
WANT TO BUILD A FINANCIAL EMPIRE?
Subscribe to the Global Banking & Finance Review Newsletter for FREE Get Access to Exclusive Reports to Save Time & Money
By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website. We Will Not Spam, Rent, or Sell Your Information.
Private banking and wealth management is not a bubble in which its customers are suddenly different people. They’re the same audience who go to the cinema with their kids, or get a coffee from Starbucks. Yes, ofcourse wealth delivers greater levels of access and luxury, but that is still underpinned by a more general shift in expectations towards convenience and service. HNWI’s expect technology to help, not hinder. In fact, even more so they expect technology to fuel experience.
With that in mind, it’s imperative we understand the world outside private wealth in order to positively drive change from within it. I can think of three big questions which immediately come to mind.
Question 1: How does selling long-term returns fit into today’s world of instant gratification? If we expect immediacy in every aspect of our lives does, should, and could that same rule apply to our investments? Flexibility and convenience now overrule tradition and the old order. If we consider that people are making money earlier, then it’s logical to suppose that playing the long game is hardly appealing to their psychology.
Perhaps Nutmeg have the right idea? The business instigated new fee structures in February 2017 with Martin Stead, Chief Executive of Nutmeg, stating:
“Fees are the only part of your investment performance that you can control. The fees you pay can make a significant difference over time. Even a tiny reduction can make a massive saving over 20 or 30 years.”
Irrespective of how wealthy you are, savings are savings.
Question 2: In a world filtered through digital interfaces, how important is the more personal human touch? Undoubtedly the more digital we are, the more human we must become, but being human is different to demanding face time. Technology is bricolage and should be bought together based on user value, not for technology’s sake.
69% of HNWIs are now using online/mobile banking, but only a quarter of wealth managers currently offer digital channels beyond email (SOURCE: PWC/2016). No wonder disruptors like Wealthify and MoneyFarm are challenging the market. It’s hardly surprising products and services which seems so in tune with innovating modern HNWI tech solutions would be breaking the market. Private banking needs to take a long hard look at its existing service offer and marketing tech stacks, as this disruption will only become more acute. Technical debt is not an excuse to not test and learn new products, services and client engagement strategies. Off platform innovation doesn’t need to interrupt existing technical stacks, but it is required for private banks to transform themselves beyond business as usual.
Question 3: If personal contact is the way forward (or at least part of the way forward), then what is the perceived value in it (if there is any)? As with retail banking, self-service is a phenomenon which will sweep through private banking and wealth management businesses. And although a huge amount of value is placed on advice and good counsel, what does this experience deliver and can it ‘out-value’ data?
So, some rather big themes here. The answer surely lies in truly knowing and empathising with an audience.
Undoubtedly, there is huge opportunity to disrupt private banking and wealth management. But this will only be possible if there is a significantly better understanding of their audiences and future target customers. It is likely there will be an immediate need to disrupt the market and create new rules of engagement – and with it new value. As wealth management and private banking become homogenous and commoditised with other financial services, the importance of strong brand identity and service offer is key, but it must be rooted in customer need.
Moving forward, how people advocate your service and endorse your business will become crucial, as will having a clear verbal strategy and positioning. ‘Peer-to-peer’ and ‘member-to-member’ business models have always driven the financial markets, and never has it been more important than when set against the social web. If brands are built and burnt by conversation, so are wealth managers and private banking services. A strong identity backed by a customer-centric, digitally-enabled (and premium) product/service offers will form the foundation of success.
To do this we must first understand the psychology of HNWIs.
- What drives them beyond money?
- What is truly valuable to them, both today and tomorrow?
- What influences their decisions? Where does the rational meet the emotional?
- How can brands (and their employees) differentiate themselves beyond the traditional service model in order to keep a seat at the top table?
- What is the language of risk and how do we describe it?
These are the same sets of questions any brand or sector that is on the brink of disruption should be asking themselves. The question is, who’s in the best position to get ahead?