Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.


FICO survey shows credit grantors prefer letters but consumers prefer SMS

“Stop sending us letters when we pay late and start texting us.” That was a resounding message from UK consumers in a new survey on lender communications by Silicon Valley analytics firm FICO. While 31 percent of respondents said credit grantors send late-payment reminders via the mail, making it the most-used channel, only 14 percent prefer that channel. The top preference was for SMS messages (42 percent), with email following at 23 percent.

“Consumers consistently tell us that when it comes to late payment reminders and other debt-related messages, their banks are not communicating with them in the ways that they would prefer,” said Steve Hadaway, general manager for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at FICO. “The UK does seem to be ahead of the US in terms of digital transformation, some 28 percent of UK respondents said their bank uses SMS to communicate with them, compared to 15 percent in the US. But UK and US banks are both pretty far from matching channels with customer preferences.”

The survey also found that:

  • Twice as many people in the UK said they would be most likely to respond to a collection message that is friendly, helpful, and delivered through a trusted source (25 percent) than said they would respond because the lender reduced or restructured their debt (12 percent).
  • Websites or online portals were the preferred method of making late payments (30 percent), with phone calls a distant second (18 percent).
  • Two-thirds of respondents (65 percent) said they would be “not at all comfortable” with payment reminders showing up in Facebook, Facebook Messenger, Instagram or other social media channels.

“What’s most important in these findings is the spread of opinions,” said Russell Robinson, who manages FICO’s mobile communications business in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. “There is no one best way to communicate with your customers — people have different preferences, and they expect lenders to remember that and treat them as individuals.”

FICO surveyed 3,600 consumers, 18+ years of age, in nine countries around the globe between June and August 2017.