SCRAPPING RESTRICTIONS ON PENSION’S ACCESS IS “DANGEROUS AND ILL-CONCEIVED” - Top Stories news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
Top Stories

SCRAPPING RESTRICTIONS ON PENSION’S ACCESS IS “DANGEROUS AND ILL-CONCEIVED”

Published by Gbaf News

Posted on March 21, 2014

2 min read
Add as preferred source on Google

Concerns Raised Over Pension Access Changes

The Chancellor’s budget announcement that restrictions on pensions access are to be lifted have been slammed as “dangerous,” “short sighted” and “ill-conceived” by the chief executive of one of the world’s largest independent financial advisory organisations.

The comments from Nigel Green, the founder and CEO of deVere Group, come after George Osborne confirmed in the 2014 Budget that anyone over the age of 55 will from next year be able to take their entire pension pot as cash, depending on their marginal rate of income tax.

Nigel Green, CEO deVere Group

Nigel Green, CEO deVere Group

Policy Conflicts With Pension Purpose

Mr Green notes: “This move to scrap the restrictions is in direct conflict with the spirit and purpose of pensions – which is to provide the individual with an income throughout their retirement.

“It’s a depressingly short sighted approach from the Treasury, which will be hoping to raise additional tax revenue in the short-term by allowing a greater number of people to receive all their pension funds in a lump sum.

“But should these people run their savings dry in the early stages of their retirements – as I suspect many will do, who will fund them? How will any of their potential housing, medical or care costs be financed for instance? It will, in the majority of situations, be down to the State – which is already in the midst of a deepening, and therefore increasingly costly, welfare crisis due to the ageing population.

Full Drawdown Risks for Retirees and Economy

“This policy of allowing a full drawdown is extremely dangerous and ill-conceived for both individuals, who are considerably more likely to become financially dependent on the State, and the wider economy, which needs the population to be as financially independent as possible to secure long-term stability, growth and competitiveness.”

Positive Response to Annuity Changes

However, Mr Green champions plans presented in the Budget to stop forcing individuals to buy an annuity at retirement.

He comments: “Releasing people from buying annuities should be welcomed. With many of today’s working population likely to spend three decades in retirement, it’s imperative that all possible barriers to saving adequately for older age are removed.

Increased Flexibility Encourages Retirement Saving

“This measure encourages people to save knowing that they can access the full capital rather than purchase an annuity, which have been offering very low returns in recent years.”

Key Takeaways

  • Nigel Green criticises scrapping pension access restrictions as undermining retirement income purpose.
  • He warns that allowing full lump-sum withdrawals could result in retirees exhausting savings and depending on state support.
  • He supports ending mandatory annuity purchase to improve flexibility and encourage savings.
  • Green argues low annuity returns make forced annuity purchase an outdated barrier.

References

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does Nigel Green oppose lifting pension access restrictions?
He believes it conflicts with pensions’ purpose of delivering retirement income and risks individuals running out of money and relying on the state.
What are Green’s concerns about economic impact?
He warns widespread early depletion of pension savings could increase state welfare burden at a time of demographic strain.
What change does Green support from the Budget?
He welcomes removing the requirement to buy annuities, arguing it increases flexibility and encourages saving knowing capital remains accessible.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Top Stories

Explore more articles in the Top Stories category