22% are aware of crowd-funding – just 1% have used it
BDRC Continental (www.bdrc-continental.com) publishes the thirteenth wave of its quarterly SME Finance Monitor investigating the availability of external finance for the UK’s small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The largest and most frequent study of its kind in the UK, research findings date back to the start of 2010 and are now based on more than 65,000 interviews with SMEs. The full report can be found online at http://www.sme-finance-monitor.co.uk/
Shiona Davies, Director at BDRC Continental, commented: “SMEs continue to be in a more positive mood, with the economy now far less likely to be seen as a barrier to running their business. Use of, and appetite for, external finance remains broadly stable, but we are seeing declining use of, and appetite for, ‘traditional’ core lending products like loans and overdrafts. Larger SMEs with 50-249 employees appear to be moving away from external finance, and are using leasing and HP more widely than loans or overdrafts. This may be the start of a sea change in the way SMEs raise external finance. However, although there has been speculation that newer forms of finance such as crowd-funding are becoming more popular, at present actual usage by small and medium enterprises is very low at 1%.”
Highlights from the latest research include:
Fewer SMEs are using the more traditional ‘core’ forms of finance (overdraft, loans and/or credit cards):
- 30% of SMEs were using such finance in Q2 2014 compared to 36% in the same quarter of 2012. At its peak, four in 10 SMEs were using these products
- Use of ‘other’ forms of finance such as leasing and invoice finance*, have been more stable over time, currently used by 18% of SMEs.
- Those planning to apply for finance are also less likely to be considering applying for one of these core products (63% of potential applicants in Q2 2014 compared to 72% in Q2 2012).
Whilst the largest SMEs, with 50-249 employees, remain the most likely to be using external finance, the proportion doing so has dropped over time and they are becoming less likely to have applied, or to plan to apply for, finance:
- In Q2 2012, 78% of SMEs with 50-249 employees were using external finance. In Q2 2014, that proportion had dropped to 64%
- The proportion using traditional ‘core’ forms of finance dropped from 71% to 57% of SMEs with 50-249 employees over this period, with lower use of both loans and overdrafts
- Use of ‘other‘ forms of finance has also dropped (52% to 40%), but in Q2 2014 these SMEs were more likely to be using leasing/HP than they were an overdraft or loan
- These larger SMEs were also less likely than in previous quarters to have applied for a new or renewed loan or overdraft (9% in Q2 2014 compared to 21% in Q2 2012) or to be planning to apply for facilities (13% in Q2 2014 compared to 20% in Q2 2012).
- A quarter of SMEs with any appetite for external finance (i.e. excluding the ‘Permanent non-borrowers’ (PNBs)) were aware of crowd-funding, however, usage remains very limited:
- In the first half of 2014, 22% of SMEs (excluding PNBs) were aware of crowd-funding
- 1% were using this form of finance, and a further 7% said they would consider it
- Two thirds of those aware (13% of all SMEs excluding the PNBs), said they were unlikely to consider using this form of finance
- Usage/consideration varies little by size of SME
At-a-glance findings from the latest wave include:
- Eight out of 10 SMEs had been ‘Happy non-seekers’ of finance over the previous 12 months, while 17% experienced a borrowing event (including the automatic renewal of overdraft facilities)
- Eight out of 10 SMEs (78%) met the definition of a ‘Happy non-seeker’ of finance in Q2 2014. The proportion of all SMEs that meet this definition has increased steadily over time. It was around two thirds of SMEs in 2012, and three quarters in 2013
- Over time the proportion reporting a borrowing “event” has fallen from around one in four in 2012 to around one in six in 2014
- 5% of SMEs in Q2 2014 met the definition of a ‘Would-be seeker’ of finance, who had wanted to apply but felt that something had stopped them. This has decreased over time from around 10% in 2012. The main reasons for not applying remain discouragement (almost all of it indirect, where the SME assumes they will be turned down and so does not apply) and the process of borrowing (the time, expense, hassle etc.)
- Success rates: Two thirds (66%) of all applications made in the last 18 months resulted in a facility. Renewals have been consistently more likely to be successful than requests for new money
- Most loan/overdraft renewals were successful (96% of those applied for in the 18 months to Q2 2014)
- Applications for new money were less likely to be successful (46% of those applied for in the 18 months to Q2 2014), and this proportion is declining over time, moving from above to below a 50% success rate
- Overdrafts: 74% of overdraft applications made in Q1 2013 to Q2 2014 resulted in a facility. Success rates are relatively stable over time
- Loans: 53% of loan applications made in Q1 2013 to Q2 2014 resulted in a facility. Success rates have declined somewhat over time, having been 60% for applications in the 18 months to Q1 2013.
There are a number of positive indicators for SMEs:
- The proportion of SMEs reporting a profit for the previous 12 months trading has increased steadily since the middle of 2013. 76% of SMEs interviewed in Q2 2014 reported a profit (excluding “don’t know” answers), up from 69% in Q2 of 2013
- 36% of SMEs interviewed in the first half of 2014 held more than £5,000 in credit balances compared to 30% in 2012
- In Q2 2014, 30% of SMEs reported an injection of personal funds into the business in the previous 12 months. The proportion putting in personal funds has declined over time (it was 42% in Q2 2013) as fewer SMEs reported that they “had” to put in funds
- The proportion of SMEs with a ‘worse than average’ external risk rating had been increasing over time, to 56% in Q2 2013. Since then, the risk rating profile has improved, with 47% of SMEs interviewed in Q2 2014 in this category.
- Looking ahead
In Q2 2014, 17% of SMEs saw the economic climate as a major obstacle to running their business. This was a further decline from the peak of 37% in Q1 2012.
At 8%, access to finance remains less likely to be perceived as a major obstacle. This is also the case for those with any plans or aspirations to apply for finance in future (17% in Q2 2014, 27% in Q1 2013).
In the next three months most SMEs (68%) expect to be a ‘Future happy non-seeker’ of finance. Meanwhile, 14% of SMEs plan to apply for new or renewed facilities – this has changed very little over recent waves:
- Of those planning to apply, 43% were confident that their bank would agree to their request. 26% were “not confident” – the lowest proportion in recent waves
- These confidence levels remain lower than the success rate for recent applications (66% for loan and overdraft applications made in the 18 months to Q2 2014).
Using payments to streamline everyday transport
By Venceslas Cartier, Global Head of Transportation & Smart Mobility at Ingenico Enterprise Retail
Once upon a time the only way to get from A to B on public transport was with cash – and likely a pre-paid ticket bought from a physical office. Nowadays, thanks to technological developments, options range from contactless and mobile payments, to in-app tickets and more. As payment methods advance, consumers and merchants are naturally moving towards Mobility as a Service (MaaS) systems, integrating various forms of transport services into a single mobility service, accessible on demand.
This move towards MaaS does not only streamline the consumer experience, it has other positive impacts too. Incentivising public transport use reduces environmental pollution, improves mental wellbeing by reducing travel-related stress, and aids productivity by freeing up time otherwise spent driving. With this in mind, let’s take a look at the current trends affecting the transport sector, as well as how payments can optimise transportation for both operators and consumers alike.
Optimising transport with payments
The payment process is integral to any service. A payment service provider (PSP) can provide a range of key benefits to operators by proving a gateway to the transportation open payment ecosystem, and ensuring they meet objectives in 3 key areas.
- Environmentally, by reducing the use of personal cars and alleviating pollution and congestion.
- Societally, making urban mobility more inclusive in terms of improving access to all areas and for all socioeconomic classes.
- Economically, by optimising investment in eco-structure and fostering financial transactions, therefore improving the wealth of the city.
Payments professionals’ expertise and technological solutions can make payments easy again for transport operators. They can provide a range of options so that the customer can choose which one is right for them, leveraging the capabilities of the mobility services’ infrastructure (contactless, mobile wallets, P2P, closed-loop, QR code, and blockchain).
Furthermore, they can help promote inclusion and sustainable urban development. For example, methods such as prepaid virtual cards, or mobility accounts linked to a prepaid account can reduce the risks of excluding the unbanked. The environmental impact per kilometre can also be reduced, along with the use of vehicles with lower emissions per person per kilometre.
Finally, PSPs can put merchants’ minds at ease, providing payment liability, allowing aggregation of all due amounts from all mobility service providers, and collecting payments in one single transaction from users while dispatching revenue between mobility service providers.
COVID-19’s disruption to the travel industry cannot be overlooked. In fact, research suggests that public transit ridership is down 70% across the globe since the onset of the virus, longer distance travel has seen reductions of up to 90%, and payment by cash has seen a 60% drop.
Being realistic, these behavioural shifts are unlikely to revert anytime soon, so it’s important for merchants to keep this in mind when thinking about payment methods. More than 70% of consumers and travellers say they are likely to avoid the use of cash over the next six months. As a result, more than 40 countries have already raised their contactless payment threshold, further helping consumers to avoid contact with frequently touched pin pads.
However, the pandemic has only accelerated the way things were heading already and highlighted the benefits. Within the context of the pandemic, transportation needs to reinvent itself and adapt its processes to suit the shift in commuter habits that we’ve already seen and will continue to see in the future.
Other trends to keep an eye on
Contactless has been steadily growing on the transport scene, as have mobile payments and in-app purchases. In fact, the recent move to mobile and online ticketing is the most promising method so far, having seen significant growth in the last few years and having been accelerated by COVID-19 as discussed above. Once consumers move to these easy, convenient, and seamless methods, it’s rare that they revert – so it’s a good idea for operators to think how they can cater to these preferences.
Speed and convenience are a must for busy travellers – but not at the expense of data security. Finding the right payments partner is therefore crucial so operators can safeguard their customers’ personal data, while also keeping on top of other security regulations/features such as P2P encryption, PCI certification, and tokenisation.
Next steps for operators
Public transport is essential for many peoples’ everyday lives – COVID-19 or no COVID-19. As such, mobility service providers can make a great difference to their service and operations by implementing the right solutions.
Grey skies ahead – Malta prepares for a gloomy 2021 if they can’t tackle financial crime
By Dhanum Nursigadoo, ComplyAdvantage
With the summer drawing to a close, many countries who rely significantly on warm weather tourism will be assessing the impact of Covid-19. Being a small island in the middle of the Mediterranean you would expect Malta to be taking a significant economical hit – just like we are seeing in other popular European holiday destinations – but this doesn’t take into account the strength of the Maltese economy.
Emerging from the eurozone crisis with one of the most dynamic economies strategically positioned between three continents, Malta has had one of the lowest unemployment rates in the EU and has recently seen its GDP growth expand year-on-year. But perhaps the most important aspect of the Maltese economy has been its attraction for foreign businesses with only a 5% tax on profits. It is no secret that Malta is a tax haven, probably one of the most effective tax havens in the world.
But you can’t pick and choose who takes shelter, and it’s no secret that money launderers have been taking advantage of the regulatory landscape in this archipelago.
The conditions of a tax haven suit criminal enterprises, who can take advantage of the opaque environment and blend their illegal activities with the same operations enjoyed by high net worth individuals and corporations who are looking to reduce their tax bill. And last year Malta’s keenness for secrecy and avoidance resulted in a damning report by Moneyval – the Council of Europe’s Anti-Money Laundering/Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) body – which found that while the nation had made some efforts to curb money laundering there was still much to be desired in order to bring the tax haven up to standard. Overall, they were of the opinion that Malta viewed combating money laundering as a non-priority and this resulted in branding Malta with low to partial ratings for 30 out of the 40 Financial Action Task Force (FATF) recommendations.
The findings of the report were stated to have the potential to “create within the wider public the perception that there may exist a culture of inactivity or impunity”. This follows on from a series of international high-profile stories regarding Malta and financial crime. Most shocking was the murder of journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia – who investigated corruption and money laundering in her native country – and was killed by a car-bomb three years ago leading to international outrage and condemnation.
Now Malta is in a race against time to turn their reputation around or they will suffer genuine consequences. The FATF have threatened to place Malta on a “greylist” of high-risk jurisdictions unless they have shown a genuine commitment to combatting financial crime and implemented the recommendations of the Moneyval report. If they fail, this would make Malta the first EU country to make the list and join others such as Panama, Syria and Zimbabwe.
The pandemic has actually given Malta more time to meet these obligations, and it has been widely reported that an initial summer deadline has now been moved to October due to the widespread disruption.
As we head into the autumn, there are signs that Malta has begun to take action. The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) has created and established an empowered AML now headed up by Anthony Eddington, formerly of the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority and who has previous experience of tackling anti-financial crime at Deutsche Bank. This team has already begun working closely with international experts, specifically partners in the US through the US embassy in Malta and the United States Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). In May this collaboration led to 25 new cases focused on money laundering in particular, and with plans to increase standard inspections and on-site investigations into businesses in Malta, it appears there is a change to the country’s priorities.
Importantly, the report highlighted a problem for countries that choose to become tax havens. In some cases it was not that the Maltese authorities deliberately turned a blind-eye, but simply that they did not have the necessary knowledge to effectively tackle financial crime in the first place. Law enforcement appeared unable to even recognise when crime was occurring.
But this blurring of financial compliance will not help businesses if Malta does indeed become “greylisted” this year. While not as devastating as being blacklisted (the two occupants of this list are Iran and North Korea) there are significant detrimental effects to being put on the FATF greylist. Although this signals that the country is committed to developing AML/CFT plans (unlike the blacklist) it still sends out a warning signal to the world that this is a high-risk area, with the country in question subject to increased monitoring and potential sanctions from the IMF and the World Bank. Make no mistake, being put on the greylist will be catastrophic for Malta’s economy.
It remains to be seen how the work to avoid such a calamity will affect Malta’s tax haven status. Perhaps with an increased fight against financial crime there will be less ability to defend one of Europe’s most competitive tax regimes. But if Malta does not show they are genuinely committed to tackling this problem, then the pandemic disruption to the island’s tourism may be minor in comparison to the grey clouds that now approach their shores.
How will the UK prepare a supply chain for the distribution of the Covid-19 vaccines?
By Don Marshall, Marketing role at Exporta.
The challenge of mobilising a supply chain for the introduction of a global and nationwide vaccine will be enormously complex. The process will be costly, and it’s likely the figures will stretch to the hundreds of millions for both the production of the vaccine itself and its distribution across the UK. We must prepare and plan a supply chain strategy to ensure it reaches those most in need in a timely and safe manner.
The task of immunising a whole population is something that has never been planned or likely imagined by anyone within a standard supply chain. A supply chain that goes directly from the manufacturer to the end consumer, or user/ patient in this case, is complex and goes beyond the scope of any single logistics company. It would have to be conceived and delivered via a large joint effort and collaboration between multiple organisations. Effectively distributing the vaccine will depend on the source of manufacture, its storage requirements, and protection of the vaccines from manufacture through to patient administration.
The majority of vaccines require storage within a specific temperature range and need to be handled safely and in hygienic conditions. Depending on where the vaccines are manufactured, the transport legs will vary; if they are coming from overseas, air freight will increase cost and complexity. In addition to supplying the vaccine, syringes, needles and containers also need to be taken into account when preparing the supply chain.
Securing the specific types of boxes or containers i.e. the lidded containers normally used for transporting pharmaceutical products will mean acquiring them from all available stockists and manufacturers. Delivery vehicles would then need to be considered, with temperature-control factored in. The medical supply chain can inform their approach to distribution by assessing data from previous supply chains, and how large quantities of vaccines have been sent out in the past. Collating successful vaccine delivery examples from other parts of the world would be advantageous here, the more we can do to prepare for a logistical challenge of this magnitude, the better.
The distribution of this COVID vaccine will be unique in its scale and for that reason, additional supply chains will need to be mobilised. Apart from medical supply chains, those best suited for this type of transportation are the fresh/frozen food industries and supermarkets. I would mobilise these businesses to assist with the vaccine’s distribution wherever possible and use their car parks and facilities for the temporary medical centres needed to administer the vaccine to the public.
Using the food industry and supermarket networks would leave the current pharmaceutical supply chains intact for health services, pharmacies and the NHS. It would protect those vital services and continue to serve communities across the UK. Inevitably, it would place a short term strain on food supply chains, but these are supply chains that are well-equipped and versed in coping with excess demand i.e. the spike endured from the brief spell of public panic buying at the start of the crisis. With adequate resourcing and planning, I believe the UK supply chain can and will handle this challenge.
Reconnecting the retail brain: learning from the octopus
By John Malpass, Retail Consultancy Practice Lead at Teradata An octopus has nine brains: one for each tentacle and plus one at...
How robotic technology will disrupt the manufacturing industry
By Marga Hoek, author of The Trillion Dollar Shift Robotics technology has the potential to disrupt industries across all sectors...
RPA, the software robots that finance and banking professionals need to hear about.
By Rory Gray, Vice President of Sales at leading software automation firm, UiPath, explains what role Robotic Process Automation (RPA)...
The rise of nomadic work: how to turn your remote team into a creative force
By Paige Erickson, EMEA MD, Workfront During the first stage of the lockdown in the spring, almost half of Brits...
The value of digital identity in payments
By Vince Graziani, CEO, IDEX Biometrics ASA In ever more challenging times, the payments industry needs to maintain trust by...
Consumers in the COVID era can learn to embrace strong customer authentication
By Ed Whitehead, Signifyd managing director, EMEA The changes that COVID-19 has caused in rapid succession make it hard to...
How NatWest used social media to better target its communications
By DuBose Cole, Head of Strategy, VaynerMedia London For banks, it is imperative to reach their existing – and potential...
It’s time to press ‘reset’ on travel and expense processes
By Rudy Daniello, EVP of Corporations, Amadeus Travel & Expenses(T&E) is a large spend category for companies across the globe....
Covid-19 and the rise of remote payment fraud: how do we catch a digital thief?
By Evgenia Loginova, co-founder and co-CEO of Radar Payments Covid -19 is finding different ways to hurt our finances –...
Effective financial planning will secure businesses a certain future
By Simon Bittlestone, CEO of financial analytics company Metapraxis 2020 has been an unpredictable year, bringing further volatility to already...