Vincent Kilcoyne discusses data dilemmas in bank compliance - Global Banking & Finance Review
Vincent Kilcoyne, Capital Markets Lead at SAS UK & Ireland, addresses critical data issues in bank compliance during a discussion on BCBS 239 principles. His insights highlight the challenges banks face in risk aggregation and reporting.
Top Stories

LEPUS, SAS RESEARCH: DATA DILEMMAS PLAGUE BANK COMPLIANCE

Published by Gbaf News

Posted on July 11, 2014

3 min read
Add as preferred source on Google

Reporting risk to regulators hampered by separate systems, inflexible sources

Increasing Regulatory Pressure on Banks

Increasing regulatory pressure requires banks to improve risk aggregation and reporting. Yet a majority struggle with data inconsistencies, says a recent Lepus Research and SAS survey. This technical hurdle was pinpointed by 81 percent of banks surveyed. More than half also face difficulties from separate risk systems and inflexible sources.

Survey Insights on BCBS 239 Adoption

Lepus surveyed 27 global financial institutions about the Basel Committee’s Principles for Effective Risk Data Aggregation and Risk Reporting. Also known as BCBS 239, the principles aim to increase transparency and reduce operational risks. Adherence to these principles allows banks to improve stress testing and anticipate future problems.

Vincent Kilcoyne

Vincent Kilcoyne

“The survey clearly shows that firms are struggling with the legacy of their separate, siloed risk systems,” said Geoff Kates, CEO of Lepus. “That makes it extremely difficult to combine high-quality data for regulatory reporting, risk and capital management, and stress testing.”

Data Origin Verification Challenges

An overwhelming majority of firms seemed skeptical of their ability to prove data origin – a requirement of BCBS 239. Some 67 percent saw room for improvement and 22 percent identified a need for significant investment.

BCBS 239 Compliance: Business Benefits and Outlook

The institutions were also asked if they expected BCBS 239 compliance initiatives to deliver ancillary business benefit. Many anticipated achieving a more holistic organizational view of risks, with 22 percent citing improved stress testing capabilities and 30 percent needing a more holistic view of firm-wide risks.

“Rather than deploy a single platform to manage and analyse risk, many banks are approaching risk management in a siloed approach  Down the line this could create further headaches and siloes mean banks will continue to have serious issues with data quality,” said Vincent Kilcoyne, Capital Markets Lead, SAS UK & Ireland. “BCBS presents banks with a unique opportunity to re-engage with one of their most valuable assets, data. While some banks will treat compliance as the goal, it is the strategic forward thinkers that will take the opportunity to view compliance as a step towards improved risk management, stress testing and ultimately better capital management.”

SAS Solutions for Risk Data Aggregation

SAS provides a range of solutions to help firms meet the BCBS 239 principles from risk data quality and management, data lineage, risk aggregation, visualization and reporting, and stress testing.

To compare your firm’s readiness for BCBS 239 to the Lepus survey results, read the report paper Industry Challenges: Implementing Effective Risk Data Solutions.

Key Takeaways

  • 81% of surveyed banks cite technical hurdles hindering risk reporting and aggregation.
  • Over half struggle due to separate risk systems and inflexible data sources.
  • 67% see room for improvement in data lineage; 22% foresee need for significant investment.
  • Many expect BCBS 239 initiatives to improve stress testing and holistic risk view, but adoption remains fragmented.

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is BCBS 239?
BCBS 239 is a Basel Committee standard—Principles for Effective Risk Data Aggregation and Risk Reporting—designed to strengthen banks’ capabilities in aggregating and reporting risk data accurately and timely.
What are the main data challenges highlighted?
Banks report technical hurdles including disconnected risk systems, inflexible data sources, and difficulty proving data lineage and origin.
How many institutions were surveyed?
The survey covered 27 global financial institutions, both G‑SIBs and D‑SIBs.
What potential benefits do banks expect from BCBS 239 compliance?
Institutions anticipate improved stress‑testing, a more holistic organization‑wide risk view, and better capital management.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Top Stories

Explore more articles in the Top Stories category