Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

HOW ARE WE POSITIONED AHEAD OF THE BREXIT VOTE?

By David Absolon, Investment Director at Heartwood Investment Management

The Brexit vote is less than two weeks away, the margin of error remains tight and, whatever the outcome, this debate is revealing more uncertainties about the course of further European Union integration and British domestic politics. Markets are largely expecting that an ‘In’ vote would lead to a short-term relief rally, while an ‘Out’ vote would be seen as more of a shock.

Our tactical investment decisions over the last few months have been shaped by global considerations, rather than in response to any one single event, such as Brexit.  However, Brexit comes at a time when we have to recognise that there are more uncertainties in the world and, as the year has progressed, our portfolios have been increasingly positioned to reflect our more cautious view. The overall growth trajectory remains stable, which has been helped by reduced headline risks around China and a rebound in the oil price, but it is arguably less secure than in previous years. Brexit, central bank exhaustion, the US election cycle and the extension of the bull cycle are all factors that could lead to economic disequilibrium.

So how should investors respond?

We believe that the current environment demands a greater focus on risk management, capital preservation and portfolio diversification. Our central case remains of a benign global macroeconomic backdrop and range-bound markets, but we have to acknowledge that downside risks have increased. In light of upcoming events, including Brexit, we have incrementally reduced overall risk levels within portfolios in the last few months:

  • We continue to believe that equities will deliver more compelling risk-adjsuted returns over the medium term. However, this will be an environment for active and flexible investors, as we expect to see greater dispersion by sector, style and geography. We have reduced our overall allocation to equities, though maintaining a modest overweight. From a style perspective, we have a value tilt in recognition that growth stocks’ valuations may prove difficult to justify without a turnaround in the current earnings backdrop. We are also edging higher our weighting in emerging market equities within our higher growth strategies, as these markets are postioned for long-term growth opportunities.
  • In terms of our UK equity market allocation, we maintain an underweight position, holding a higher weighting in large-cap equities, which are heavily skewed to energy and miners and, in aggregate, are beneficiaries of a weaker sterling. We continue to believe that domestically-exposed small- and mid-cap stocks could see more pressure on the basis of the economic uncertainty presented by a Brexit outcome, as well as higher import costs due to a weaker sterling. On other side of the Brexit question, we could see significant market falls in European equities in the event of an ‘out’ vote, notwithstanding likely dispersions between sectors and countries. Inevitably, periphery countries would most likely absorb the brunt of a risk-off trade. However, sterling investors would be cushioned by a weaker UK currency. Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that global investors, which have been reducing their allocation to the region over the past three months, may be attracted back on a valuation basis.
  • In bonds, we are keeping duration short in UK and US government markets, but will take the opportunity to add to our market weighting should yields rise from current levels, given that global interest rates are likely to stay historically low. In the event of a ’Brexit’ scenario, UK gilts are likely to find a safe-haven bid initially. However, this will not necessarily be a one-way trade, given worries about capital flight, a softer near-term growth outlook and a weaker sterling, which may foster inflationary pressures in the future, as well as impact the funding of the UK’s sizeable current account deficit.