axstj newschessdsc 0031 stj1
Top Stories

HALF OF CEOS QUESTION THE VALUE OF INTERNAL EVENTS

Published by Gbaf News

Posted on November 20, 2014

2 min read
Add as preferred source on Google

Almost half of CEOs see internal events as a cost rather than an investment, according to the directors that work for them. That’s one of the key findings of new research amongst event managers and directors at FTSE 250 organisations and UK multinationals.

Internal Events Used for Key Business Goals

Research from INVOLVE, the communications agency, finds that internal events are used to influence ‘business critical’ measures, such as employee engagement (84%) and revenue/profit (81%). However, directors believe that only half of CEOs (51%) see internal events as an investment compared to almost two thirds of employees (67%).

Spending Levels Impact CEO Perception

CEOs in low spend organisations (those that spend between £100,000 to £250,000 a year on internal events, as defined by respondents) see events as more of an investment than those in high spend organisations (with spend of £250,000 to £1 million a year.)

Challenges in Measuring Internal Event ROI

Although events are used to influence ‘business critical’ measures, corporates are not consistently measuring whether they are achieving goals. Only 54% of directors claim to measure the ROI extremely or very robustly. However, event managers claim to measure ROI more with 62% saying they do so extremely or very robustly. Not surprisingly perhaps, those with larger spend claim to be better at evaluation (61% as opposed to 46%).

Traditional Evaluation Methods Still Prevail

Most companies opt for conventional evaluation methods, often focused on collating feedback. 73% of companies use post-event delegate surveys; 46% use direct feedback and 31% use ‘happy sheets’ on the day. Event managers collect much more direct feedback than their bosses, 61% compared to 46%.

Disconnect Between CEOs and Company Leaders

Jeremy Starling, Managing Director of INVOLVE, says: “There is a clear disconnect between the CEOs view of internal events and the views of the rest of the company.”

“A prime cause of this has to be a lack of proof that internal events are delivering long-term behavioural change or hitting other indicators of success. The long-term growth of this industry depends on securing buy-in from CEOs across the board. Using robust measurements to track ROI is vital to determine whether internal events are truly effective and successfully delivering against an organisation’s ‘business critical’ goals.”

Key Takeaways

  • Almost half of CEOs view internal events as a cost rather than an investment despite their role in driving engagement and profit.
  • CEOs in lower‑spending organisations see more value in internal events compared to those in high‑spend firms.
  • Only around half of directors measure ROI robustly, while event managers report higher measurement rates.
  • Post‑event surveys dominate evaluation methods, but behavioural impact measurement remains inconsistent.

References

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do some CEOs view internal events as a cost?
Directors suggest a lack of proof that internal events deliver long‑term behavioural change or hit key business indicators leads CEOs to question their investment value.
How do spending levels affect CEO perceptions?
CEOs in lower‑spend organisations (£100k‑£250k/year) are more likely to see internal events as an investment compared to those in high‑spend firms (£250k‑£1m/year).
Who measures ROI more robustly—directors or event managers?
Event managers report measuring ROI extremely or very robustly more often (62%) than directors (54%).
Which evaluation methods are most commonly used?
Most rely on conventional feedback: post‑event delegate surveys (73%), direct feedback (46%), and same‑day “happy sheets” (31%).

Tags

Related Articles

More from Top Stories

Explore more articles in the Top Stories category