Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.


FICO® Falcon® Assurance Navigator uses rules and analytics to continually monitor transactions and strengthen financial controls with Stanford University


  • FICO® Falcon® Assurance Navigator uses analytics to identify and mitigate risk in federal grant spending
  • Stanford University’s input continues to shape the product, which they are now using
  • New product uses proven analytics methods pioneered in FICO Falcon Fraud Manager, which protects 2.6+ billion payment cards worldwide

Analytic software firm FICO today announced that Stanford University is using FICO® Falcon® Assurance Navigator, a new product aimed at monitoring all procurement spending and discretionary expenses for indications of policy and regulatory non-compliance. The product gives public and private universities a better way to ensure compliance with internal policies and government regulations around the use of federal grant dollars.

More information: http://www.fico.com/en/products/fico-falcon-assurance-navigator

All university departments have to properly manage expenses and exercise sound fiscal stewardship, but the stakes are higher when it comes to managing federal award dollars. In December 2014, Circular A-81 from the US Office of Management and the Budget took effect, with new rules aimed at strengthening oversight of federal funds to reduce fraud, waste, and abuse. In addition, auditors are beginning to apply more sophisticated, data-driven approaches to identify misuse of public funds.

The complexity of managing grant dollars and the potential under A-81 for a growing volume of financial transactions needing review and documentation led Stanford University to proactively engage with FICO to explore an analytics-driven solution to address this problem, which will be faced by many leading universities.

“University transaction volume has grown too great to assess every transaction with manual staff reviews,” said Ben Moreno, chief procurement officer at Stanford University. “We have high standards that have to be met through a smarter, more efficient solution. We need to protect our eligibility for future grants and our ability to provide a safety net to protect the University against fraud, waste, and abuse by putting the right system in place. We worked with FICO to build a ground-breaking, analytics-based system to give us the control we need over all our grant-related spending.”

“This is a big problem – the federal government distributes $600 billion a year in grant awards to educational institutions, government agencies and other non-profits,” said Doug Clare, FICO vice president for product management. “Getting grant spend and related expenses right is more than just a cost issue, it’s also about protecting the reputation of the organisation. If not done right, an organisation risks losing federal grant money and could find itself on the front page of the newspaper for the wrong reasons. Stanford took a leadership role in this issue, and we used our work with them to develop a product for all grant recipients and private sector organisations looking to strengthen financial oversight.”

FICO Falcon Assurance Navigator leverages FICO’s 25 years of experience in detecting anomalous financial transactions and developing complex outlier detection algorithms, which have made FICO® Falcon® Fraud Manager the global leader in card fraud protection. Falcon Fraud Manager protects more than 2.6 billion payment cards worldwide.

Whereas most universities today monitor only a sample of transactions, Falcon Assurance Navigator monitors 100 percent of spend activity. Each transaction is analysed using two different forms of analytics. The first method relies on expert-driven rules to assess each transaction against university policies as well as federal grant guidelines. The second analytic method applies algorithms designed to identify outlier behaviour and rank-order transactions based on potential risk severity. For example, airfares that are not compliant with university policies represent frivolous use of university money. Noncompliant or excessive airfare can jeopardise millions of dollars in future awards and damage a university’s reputation. Naturally, noncompliant transactions using federal funds receive higher risk scores that reflect their higher priority.

Falcon Assurance Navigator has modules for purchase requisitions and orders, invoices, expense reimbursement (e.g. travel and entertainment spend), and purchasing cards. The system incorporates a robust case management application and text analytics, including optical character recognition for receipts and other documents, and complex analysis of key words contained in free-text fields. Each module allows for the insertion of one or many domain-specific rule sets, and users can create queues for case review, approvals and routing.

“Our breakthrough with Falcon Fraud Manager more than 20 years ago was using proprietary analytics to monitor all card transactions,” Clare said. “We helped card issuers drive down fraud losses by two-thirds. This approach can have the same impact on procurement and expense control.”