Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

China needs confidence and resolve in face of trade war

BEIJING- A news report by China.org.cn on the trade war against China launched by the United States:

A trade war against China was launched by the United States as the 2018 World Cup kicked off. Two different forms of confrontation have since started. On June 18, the White House made a statement, threatening tariffs on $200 billion or even $400 billion of Chinese products. In response, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce said on June 19 that if the United States takes the further step, China will have no choice but to take multiple measures, both quantitative and qualitative, to strike back resolutely. Now a trade war seems to be imminent.

Since his election, President Trump has repeatedly stressed on numerous occasions that bilateral trade between the United States and China has been unbalanced, and that it is unfair that the United States has suffered a deficit, while China has seen a surplus.

The allegation that Sino-U.S. bilateral trade remains unbalanced is true, but this can’t be taken as an unfair outcome. The origins of the current situation are complex. The chief causes of the problem are the difference between the two countries’ economic structures, the role of the U.S. dollar as a global currency, an American lifestyle featuring low deposits and high consumption, and U.S. export restrictions on high-tech products to China, amid other systemic issues. Taking the U.S. dollar’s role as an example, the United States managed to make the dollar a global currency, which led to an enormous profit gain. However, to maintain the dollar’s position, the United States must dispense its currency extensively worldwide, which has led to trade deficits. This is the cost that the United States has to pay. The logic is simple, and the businessman-turned U.S. president is fully aware of this fact. He has just conveniently failed to mention it.

The United States has dominated the world ever since WWII, and as a super power, it has long forgotten how to win alongside other countries. A win-win situation seems to mean the U.S. wins, then wins again.

Over the past four decades of reform and opening up, China has seized opportunities to globalize, promoting rapid economic development. It has become the world’s second-largest economy. In the past five years in particular, the country has intensified its efforts to promote progress in the economy, military, culture, science and technology. China’s GDP share of the global economy has grown to roughly 15 percent, up from 11 percent. However, some U.S. politicians wedded to Cold War mentality use these achievements as a pretext to fan the flames of the so-called “China threat” and to wage a trade war against China.

China had no intention of engaging in a trade war of any sort. In recent months, it has been working to resolve the problem through negotiation. However, as an old Chinese saying goes, “The trees may prefer calm but the wind will not subside.” When someone declares a trade war against China, we have no choice but to respond. China has a very large population with great market potential and a hugely resilient economy, thus it is able to adjust itself quickly to any situations and is able to deal with enduring pressures. Trade tariffs, whether placed on goods worth $50 billion or $200 billion, are merely figures on paper and the results are hard to predict.

This year marks the 40th anniversary of China’s reform and opening-up policies. The country has now reached a new starting point. We have all the confidence, patience and resolve to deal with a trade war.