Ted Rees, partner at Crossbridge, looks at the challenges still facing banks surrounding Basel III.
Banks are faced with sizable challenges in achieving the Basel III deadlines and objectives. The sheer scale of the change required results in high resource costs of implementation that, together with the impact of the actual capital requirements, will significantly dent banks’ return on equity over the coming years.
Firms will need to undergo huge expense to implement the Basel III and other important US and EU regulations, which will result in resources being diverted from other areas that typically drive revenue growth, such as product development, improved infrastructure and enhanced customer service. As a result, profitability will suffer and the net effect of which, ironically for some banks, will be vicious circle of weakening of their capital buffers.
At Crossbridge, we see challenges in three key areas – project delivery complexities, data quality, and resource constraints. How banks manage the balance-sheet impact of the new capital charges is also critical to their continuing success.
The Big Game
The scale and complexity of large regulatory projects adds considerably to their delivery risk. Unlike similarly sized internal projects failure or postponement is not an option. Simply managing software release schedules presents headaches when there are already busy release windows for risk and finance systems and parallel changes being made due to other regulations. Co-ordinating such a large programme of work requires careful planning and understanding of the real dependencies, as well as the potential for leveraging and re-using work undertaken across other regulatory programmes – a bit like ensuring the roads only get dug up once when gas, electricity and water repairs are needed.
To give a flavour of the scale of change, one of the Basel III regulations requires a bank to calculate value at risk (VaR) on individual client/counterparty exposures. In many cases, this will require a wholesale re-engineering of the way that “normal” aggregated market risk VaR is calculated. Given the amount of testing that is therefore necessary, there is an increased dependency on significantly greater volumes of data that could lead to calculation errors. Similar problems occur with many of the other key regulations, such as central counterparty clearing under MiFID II.
Regulatory projects also provide a number of headaches for managers and teams applying the classic structured, ‘waterfall’ approach. Often the project has to begin the process of implementing changes before the regulations have actually been clarified. A good example occurred in Basel 2.5, where the inclusion of sovereign positions (excluded from risk capital calculation under the old rules) was only clarified by the regulators half way through the process. This resulted in large changes to both the risk capital models and the required data to input into the calculations. Project managers who have experienced regulatory projects in the past will be acutely aware of these difficulties and will strive to ensure that architecture and designs are sufficiently flexible to cope with last minute changes. Model parameters often have to be designed to second guess regulators’ revised demands, as market, economic and political conditions change.
Dealing with Curve-balls
The process of getting all the legislation drafted and approved is by no means straight-forward – each jurisdiction may have different local laws and languages, which can cause subtle differences in interpretation, often leading to delays and protracted clarification of the final requirements. This issue is amplified for global institutions that have to comply with several local regulators and their legal rulings on each regulation.
More recently, banks have also had to consider changes in regulators’ use of enforcement. In the last few years since the Credit Crisis, banking regulators have become increasingly assertive and intrusive in their monitoring activities, requiring greater evidence that banks’ internal processes meet regulatory requirements. In the context of Basel III, regulators may increasingly demand evidence that banks meet the requirements of the Pillar II “Use Test” leading to significant changes to firms’ operating models and capital adequacy report submissions.
When considering the impact of Basel III on their Risk and Capital processes and systems, banks also need to consider other external economic influences such as the rating agencies. Banks’ credit ratings have come under significant pressure, with many firms experiencing one or more downgrades and the corresponding impacts on their funding costs and profitability. In this environment, banks are placing more importance on the information they provide to the rating agencies, driving a requirement for high quality information on capital adequacy that aligns with the rating agencies’ needs. This places additional requirements on the capital and risk calculation and reporting systems and processes, which do not align fully with those needed for Basel III. Banks need to consider how best to align their responses to these competing demands, so that they deal effectively with, and maximise re-use across both.
Rubbish In, Rubbish Out
The data quality challenges need to be addressed in three main areas: market price data, trade and transaction level data and reference data (particularly for clients).
Historical market data is needed to calculate possible losses over a given period (as used in VaR calculations). In many cases data clean-up programmes are already underway to ensure that data is fit for purpose, however further clean-ups are likely to be required, as the business and capital impacts are reviewed and explanations of unexpected results point to data quality and calibration issues rather than actual structural or capital inadequacies.
In most cases transaction level data is already available in existing front office feeds to risk and finance control systems. However, these may not be sufficiently detailed to provide the required inputs to the new calculations or the data may be available but has never been used for such critical calculations, so may not be reliable.
The third area where data quality issues are likely to occur is in reference data. Fortunately previous regulatory and credit risk programmes have led organisations to adopt better frameworks to link their client reference data together. These multi-year programmes have often become expensive and require continuous focus and improvement to ensure requirements are being met, leading to further unwelcome costs.
Fielding the Right Team
Another obvious challenge is ensuring the number and capability of the people engaged is right. In practice, most regulatory projects are looking for the same type of resources at the same time and market-wide shortages often result.
In some cases, a good solution is to redeploy front office experts onto risk or finance projects – simply employing “regulatory specialists” may appear to be the right choice on the surface, but in practice a detailed knowledge of a firm’s proprietary front office products, pricing and valuation algorithms, accounting practices and data representations is more valuable than being well versed in details of the regulations.
However due to cost cutting and the diversion of existing resources on to competing, mandatory regulatory projects, many front office areas are now more sparsely staffed. This leads to risks that either delivery deadlines are missed, supplied data feeds are not up to the required standard, or the calculation and transmission processes have been insufficiently tested.
There are no easy solutions to these challenges, but a lot can be achieved by ensuring the programme leadership teams have broad experience and calm heads. Ensuring all the teams work together across all affected support, risk, finance and front office functions requires respected leadership, with a strong mandate and a sense of common purpose.
A key to the success of Basel III projects, is securing realistic capital impact calculations as early as possible. These allow the business to plan ahead and also to flush out any inaccuracies early on in the process. Whilst the challenges of inaccurate data and uncertain regulatory requirements can unfortunately, weaken the impact of this exercise and risk that incorrect planning decisions are made, obtaining sight of these issues helps to prioritise resolution and ensure awareness of the underlying problems is highlighted in a timely fashion.
An open dialogue with the regulator to address challenging points up front will also help to prevent misunderstanding, big surprises or unintended consequences when updated regulations are issued. This will help firms decide where to re-focus efforts, and where to adopt a ‘wait and see’ approach or move forward based on well-founded assumptions.
The industry faces an unprecedented period of uncertainty, volatility and external scrutiny, and the on-going nature of the regulatory environment we now operate in means that future initiatives will largely depend on the speed with which banks are able to embed regulatory compliance into the day-to-day functions of the organisation. Traditionally under-funded ‘control functions’ are growing in importance and relevance and it may be time to establish regulatory compliance and internal control as a key pillar of firms’ business and operating models.
Ted Rees is a partner at Crossbridge, a specialist consultancy focused exclusively on Financial Markets with a client base covering many of the world’s leading banks and investment firms.
ECB stays put but warns about surge in infections
By Balazs Koranyi and Francesco Canepa
FRANKFURT (Reuters) – The European Central Bank warned on Thursday that a new surge in COVID-19 infections poses risks to the euro zone’s recovery and reaffirmed its pledge to keep borrowing costs low to help the economy through the pandemic.
Having extended stimulus well into next year with a massive support package in December, ECB policymakers kept policy unchanged on Thursday, keen to let governments take over the task of keeping the euro zone economy afloat until normal business activity can resume.
But they warned about a new rise in infections and the ensuing restrictions to economic activity, saying they were prepared to provide even more support to the economy if needed.
“The renewed surge in coronavirus (COVID-19) infections and the restrictive and prolonged containment measures imposed in many euro area countries are disrupting economic activity,” ECB President Christine Lagarde said in her opening statement.
Fresh lockdowns, a slow start to vaccinations across the 19 countries that use the euro, and the currency’s strength will increase headwinds for exporters, challenging the ECB’s forecasts of a robust recovery starting in the second quarter.
Lagarde saluted the start of vaccinations as “an important milestone” despite “some difficulty” and said the latest data was still in line with the ECB’s forecasts.
She conceded that the strong euro, which hit a 2-1/2 year high against the dollar earlier this month, was putting a dampener on inflation and reaffirmed that the ECB would continue to monitor the exchange rate.
The euro has dropped 1% on a trade-weighted basis since the start of the year, but is up nearly 7% over the last 12 months. Against the U.S. dollar, that number rises to over 10%.
Opening the door for more stimulus if needed, Lagarde confirmed the ECB would continue buying bonds until “it judges that the coronavirus crisis phase is over”.
Lagarde also kept a closely watched reference to “downside” risks facing the euro zone economy, which has been a reliable indicator that the ECB saw policy easing as more likely than tightening.
But she signalled those risks were less acute, in part thanks to the recent Brexit deal.
“The news about the prospects for the global economy, the agreement on future EU-UK relations and the start of vaccination campaigns is encouraging,” Lagarde said. “But the ongoing pandemic and its implications for economic and financial conditions continue to be sources of downside risk.”
Lagarde conceded that the immediate future was challenging but argued that should not impact the longer term.
“Once the impact of the pandemic fades, a recovery in demand, supported by accommodative fiscal and monetary policies, will put upward pressure on inflation over the medium term,” Lagarde said.
Benign market indicators support Lagarde’s argument. Stocks are rising, interest rates are steady and government borrowing costs are trending lower, despite some political drama in Italy.
There is also around 1 trillion euros of untapped funds in the Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme (PEPP) to back up her pledge to keep borrowing costs at record lows.
The ECB has indicated it may not even need it to use it all.
“If favourable financing conditions can be maintained with asset purchase flows that do not exhaust the envelope over the net purchase horizon of the PEPP, the envelope need not be used in full,” Lagarde said.
Recent economic history also favours the ECB. When most of the economy reopened last summer, activity rebounded more quickly than expected, indicating that firms were more resilient than had been feared.
Uncomfortably low inflation is set to remain a thorn in the ECB’s side for years to come, however, even if surging oil demand helps put upward pressure on prices in 2021.
With Thursday’s decision, the ECB’s benchmark deposit rate remained at minus 0.5% while the overall quota for bond purchases under PEPP was maintained at 1.85 trillion euros.
(Editing by Catherine Evans)
Bank of Japan lifts next year’s growth forecast, saves ammunition as virus risks linger
By Leika Kihara and Tetsushi Kajimoto
TOKYO (Reuters) – The Bank of Japan kept monetary policy steady on Thursday and upgraded its economic forecast for next fiscal year, but warned of escalating risks to the outlook as new coronavirus emergency measures threatened to derail a fragile recovery.
BOJ Governor Haruhiko Kuroda said the board also discussed the bank’s review of its policy tools due in March, though dropped few hints on what the outcome could be.
“Our review won’t focus just on addressing the side-effects of our policy. We need to make it more effective and agile,” Kuroda told a news conference.
As widely expected, the BOJ maintained its targets under yield curve control (YCC) at -0.1% for short-term interest rates and around 0% for 10-year bond yields.
In fresh quarterly projections, the BOJ upgraded next fiscal year’s growth forecast to a 3.9% expansion from a 3.6% gain seen three months ago based on hopes the government’s huge spending package will soften the blow from the pandemic.
But it offered a bleaker view on consumption, warning that services spending will remain under “strong downward pressure” due to fresh state of emergency measures taken this month.
“Japan’s economy is picking up as a trend,” the BOJ said in the report, offering a slightly more nuanced view than last month when it said growth was “picking up.”
While Kuroda reiterated the BOJ’s readiness to ramp up stimulus further, he voiced hope robust exports and expected roll-outs of vaccines will brighten prospects for a recovery.
“I don’t think the risk of Japan sliding back into deflation is high,” he said, signalling the BOJ has offered sufficient stimulus for now to ease the blow from COVID-19.
NO EXIT EYED
Many analysts had expected the BOJ to hold fire ahead of a policy review in March, which aims to make its tools sustainable as Japan braces for a prolonged battle with COVID-19.
Sources have told Reuters the BOJ will discuss ways to scale back its massive purchases of exchange-traded funds (ETF) and loosen its grip on YCC to breathe life back into markets numbed by years of heavy-handed intervention.
Kuroda said the BOJ may look at such options at the review, but stressed a decision will depend on the findings of its scrutiny into the effects and costs of YCC.
He also made clear any steps the BOJ would take will not lead to a withdrawal of stimulus.
“It’s too early to exit from our massive monetary easing programme at this point,” Kuroda said. “Western economies have been deploying monetary easing steps for a decade, and none of them are mulling an exit now.”
(Reporting by Leika Kihara and Tetsushi Kajimoto; additional reporting by Kaori Kaneko; Editing by Simon Cameron-Moore & Shri Navaratnam)
World Bank, IMF agree to hold April meetings online due to COVID-19 risks
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank have agreed to hold their spring meetings, planned for April 5-11, online instead of in person due to continued concerns about the coronavirus pandemic, they said in joint statement.
The meetings usually bring some 10,000 government officials, journalists, business people and civil society representatives from across the world to a tightly-packed two-block area of Washington that houses their headquarters.
This will be the third of the institutions’ semiannual meetings to be held virtually due to the pandemic.
(Reporting by Andrea Shalal; Editing by Chris Rees
Top 8 Tax Scams to Watch Out For
It is tax time and that means finding the best way to file your taxes and to get a refund...
CEO Hisham Itani and Resource Group Recognized in the 2020 Global Banking & Finance Awards®
Global Banking & Finance Review has awarded Hisham Itani the Chairman and CEO of Resource Group, Technology CEO of the...
Euro zone business activity shrank in January as lockdowns hit services
By Jonathan Cable LONDON (Reuters) – Economic activity in the euro zone shrank markedly in January as lockdown restrictions to...
Volkswagen’s profit halves, but deliveries recovering
BERLIN (Reuters) – Volkswagen reported a nearly 50% drop in its 2020 adjusted operating profit on Friday but said car...
Global chip shortage hits China’s bitcoin mining sector
By Samuel Shen and Alun John SHANGHAI/HONG KONG (Reuters) – A global chip shortage is choking the production of machines...
Iran’s oil exports rise ‘significantly’ despite sanctions, minister says
DUBAI/LONDON (Reuters) – Iran’s oil exports have climbed in recent months and its sales of petroleum products to foreign buyers...
Nissan to source more UK batteries as part of Brexit deal ‘opportunity’
By Costas Pitas LONDON (Reuters) – Nissan will source more batteries from Britain to avoid tariffs on electric cars after...
Muted recovery for UK retailers in December ends worst year on record
By David Milliken and Andy Bruce LONDON (Reuters) – British retailers struggled to recover in December from a partial coronavirus...
Chinese phone maker Honor partners with key chip suppliers after Huawei split
By David Kirton SHENZHEN, China (Reuters) – Chinese budget phone maker Honor said on Friday it had signed partnerships with...
Oil down $1 as China COVID-19 cases trigger clampdowns
By Noah Browning LONDON (Reuters) – Oil prices fell on Friday, retreating further from 11-month highs hit last week, weighed...