Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

Are Banks Having a Kodak Moment?

Lessons from a Fallen Giant

By Edgardo Torres-Caballero

Giants have fallen when they reacted too slowly to changing consumer needs. Kodak, despite developing the first digital camera, did not believe digital photography would dominate the market, and therefore did not leverage the opportunities their discovery offered. They chose to focus on film, not innovation, and fell after a century in business.

Now banks find themselves threatened by fintechs and nimble new challengers who bring innovative products, services and slick delivery using the latest technology. Enabled by regulators and fueled by venture capital, these fintechs take a lean approach that is beginning to earn significant revenue.

Banks must answer the same dilemma Kodak once faced: do you leverage available technology and innovate, or fail to react and watch your value erode.

The path to growth

Edgardo Torres Caballero
Edgardo Torres Caballero

Established institutions can and should play in this new digital market. Retail banking has experienced a shift in customer expectations as digital natives turn away from traditional banking in favour of mobile banking services. This group forms a significant portion of the underserved market that can be accessed with the right level of service. By operating like tech companies and offering simple, experience-focused solutions, digital banks such as N26 have undergone exponential growth, demonstrating the power of this model.

 Banks’ long term growth lies in improving customer experience and accessing underserved, digitally native groups.  For this, they must be built not to last, but to change. Because agility is no longer a nice plus, it is a necessity for survival. To move forward, banks should leverage their sizable balance sheets- a key advantage over their fintech counterparts- to create a digital banking spinoff.

 Launch speed boats from cruise ships

We can understand established banks as cruise ships: large, expensive to operate and slow to manoeuver. In contrast, the digital banking spinoff can be seen as a speedboat: an independent, agile operation built for change, capable of launching within 12 months, unrestricted by geography and able to penetrate new markets. Untethered from the larger company, the speedboat breaks away from organisational processes and leaps ahead by prioritising APIs, cloud-native technology and composable architecture.

As Clayton Christensen says in The Innovator’s Dilemma, sustaining technologies are different than disruptive technologies. “Sustaining is incremental improvement of established technologies. Disruptive is a new concept of value. Managers faced with disruptive technologies fail their companies when they let organizational forces overpower them…”

Introduce new thinking, processes and people

This is why banks should launch a digital banking spinoff with a clean slate, independent of the larger organisation, instead of investing in expensive multi-year IT projects to update their legacy systems. Because when that upgrade is finally deployed, chances are the market and technology will have moved on.

The spinoff should be an innovative arm that addresses a specific market need or geography. This requires new leadership focused on the success of the digital bank alone, not conflicted by the needs of the larger organisation. Furthermore, these leaders must instill a culture of innovation from day one, enabling the spinoff to act like a startup, unconstrained by legacy processes. This approach allows for lean technology built with composable architecture, enabling the rapid launch of new products in response to market demands.

Long term sustainability

If traditional banks take a strategic market view and allow the spinoff to disrupt some of their own business internally, they can become sustainable long term. Once the spinoff is successful, existing clients can be migrated to the new operation. While it might feel like cannibalizing, this option is much more profitable than losing customers to competitors.

Kodak faced this choice. They could have pursued digital photography, but they were afraid it would eat into their film business. If they had worked on creating new digital solutions, they would have won new customers and transitioned older clientele to new products, securing their place in the market.

Financial institutions must prioritize agility to stay relevant. Improving legacy systems will not make them future-proof, as the fintech space is an evolving ecosystem which will look drastically different in a decade. However, with a digital banking spinoff designed for change, banks can operate at the same speed as startups.  Those currently on cruise ships could launch a speedboat or two. By leveraging composable architecture, the right partners and a long term vision, banks can secure their future.