• Top Stories
  • Interviews
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Banking
  • Technology
  • Investing
  • Trading
  • Videos
  • Awards
  • Magazines
  • Headlines
  • Trends
Close Search
00
GBAF LogoGBAF Logo
  • Top Stories
  • Interviews
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Banking
  • Technology
  • Investing
  • Trading
  • Videos
  • Awards
  • Magazines
  • Headlines
  • Trends
GBAF Logo
  • Top Stories
  • Interviews
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Banking
  • Technology
  • Investing
  • Trading
  • Videos
  • Awards
  • Magazines
  • Headlines
  • Trends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking and Finance Review

Global Banking & Finance Review

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Wealth
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2025 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved.

    ;
    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Top Stories

    Posted By Jessica Weisman-Pitts

    Posted on October 6, 2022

    Featured image for article about Top Stories

    Sara Agalliu, Consultant, D2 Legal Technology

    Akber Datoo,CEO, D2 Legal Technology

    By D2 Legal Technology CEO, Akber Datoo, and consultant, Sara Agalliu

    Introduction

    Certain patterns in legal drafting threaten the law’s comprehensibility and maintainability. This is further exacerbated as part of the digital agenda when contractual wording needs to sit in the context of surrounding systems and platforms.

    Lawyers may encounter these patterns in the form of legally ambiguous or questionable wording, which can arise through unclear syntax, duplicative phrases, inconsistent enumeration, terminology overloading, etc. Some legal scholars draw an analogy between the software engineering concept of “code smells”, which result from poor or misguided programming when code is written without using fundamental standards, and problematic patterns of legal drafting. In a paper entitled “Law Smells: Defining and Detecting Problematic Patterns in Legal Drafting”, legal scholars Corinna Coupette, Dirk Hartung, Janis Beckedorf, Maximilian Bother, and Daniel Martin Katz refer to these patterns as “Law Smells” and argue that they can be detected using text-based and graph-based methods.

    The significance of “Law Smells” in the financial services industry

    Documentation plays a crucial role in the financial services industry, recording the rights and obligations of contracting parties in respect of various financial instruments. Historically, the legal profession has focused on the form of words when drafting, with only secondary emphasis given to how these clauses could be understood and consumed by non-lawyers managing business and operational processes. With many institutions striving towards digital transformation and process automation, common data standards for documentation are needed to unlock business value – as the clauses now need to be amenable to the use of systems and platforms both up- and downstream within a financial services firm. Yet, problematic patterns in legal drafting, or “Law Smells”, give rise to a lack of structured data variables and present a hurdle to the standardisation and digitalisation of legal data.

    The first step in moving from written word-based contracts to those which allow for automation and application of data elements to the broader business is to develop a methodology for detecting “Law Smells”. Identifying and remedying problematic patterns of legal drafting sets the foundations for reproducible, quantitative quality measures for collections of legal rules and data, allowing us to assess the overall law climate and facilitate automatic code review and quality assurance. Lawyers or technologists can use manual inspection methods or automated tools to detect problematic patterns. A pre-defined taxonomy approach can be helpful in identifying specific patterns instead of the typical predictive methods in machine learning.

    We are only beginning to understand the prevalence and impact of the application of “Code Smells” to the legal domain, and no meta-analysis currently exists for “Law Smells”. However, three Clause Library & Taxonomy projects recently undertaken with ISDA, ISLA and ICMA respectively, provide a real-world example of the implementation of the taxonomy method that the aforementioned scholars advocate. This involved analysing a large number of documents and, through a series of working groups, identifying key variants by focusing on outcomes of the clauses pre-defined as part of the standard clause taxonomy.

    The practical benefits for the financial industry are evident and include improved trade reporting processes, implementation of process automation tools or smart contracts, and the ability to respond to regulatory change quickly.

    Conclusion

    As the financial services industry progresses further on its digital transformation journey and drive to improve data quality for better downstream use, it is vital that we address the way in which legal contracts are written. Taxonomies to define and detect problematic drafting that are often found in complex financial instrument documentation are a fundamental step in this process.

    Recommended for you

    • Thumbnail for recommended article

    • Thumbnail for recommended article

    • Thumbnail for recommended article

    Why waste money on news and opinions when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe