Banking
The Unbanked Paradox: How Banking Access Creates Economic Resilience
Global Banking and Finance Review
Company
Rosa Garcia works two part-time jobs in Houston, earning about $24,000 annually. Until recently, she cashed her paychecks at a check-cashing store, paying nearly $50 in fees each month. She paid bills with money orders, incurring additional charges. Without a bank account, she kept her savings in ca...
Rosa Garcia works two part-time jobs in Houston, earning about $24,000 annually. Until recently, she cashed her paychecks at a check-cashing store, paying nearly $50 in fees each month. She paid bills with money orders, incurring additional charges. Without a bank account, she kept her savings in cash hidden in her apartment.
"Banking seemed expensive," Rosa explains. "I thought I was saving money by avoiding bank fees, but I was actually paying more without realizing it."
Rosa represents one of America's estimated 7 million unbanked households. While most Americans take basic banking services for granted, nearly 30% of low-income Americans operate entirely outside the financial mainstream, according to groundbreaking research by economists Claire Célerier and Adrien Matray.
Their study, published in the Review of Financial Studies, reveals a striking paradox: those who most need financial services to build wealth and security are often the least likely to have them. But when banking services become more accessible, the economic benefits for vulnerable households are substantial and far-reaching.
"Understanding the effect of participating in the financial mainstream is critical," says Adrien Matray, an economist at Princeton University and co-author of the study. "Our research shows that financial inclusion creates pathways to wealth accumulation that simply aren't available to unbanked households."
The Real Cost of Being Unbanked
The unbanked often cite fees, minimum balance requirements, and distrust of financial institutions as reasons for avoiding banks. Yet the alternatives come with steep costs. Check-cashing services typically charge 1-5% of each check's value. Money orders and prepaid debit cards carry additional fees. Without access to credit through traditional banks, many turn to payday lenders charging annual percentage rates that can exceed 400%.
"These alternative financial services may seem convenient and transparent in the short term, but they're extremely costly over time," explains financial inclusion advocate Michael Barr, a former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury. "People end up paying thousands of dollars over their lifetime just to access their own money."
Beyond explicit costs, being unbanked carries hidden opportunity costs. Without interest-bearing accounts, savings don't grow. Without credit histories, loans for education, vehicles, or homes remain out of reach or come with punishing interest rates.
The Banking Access Advantage
To understand how banking access affects economic outcomes, Célerier and Matray studied what happened when regulatory changes made it easier for banks to expand across state lines. As restrictions were lifted between 1994 and 2005, bank branch density increased by approximately 20% in poorer counties.
"We exploited changes in bank regulation that were decided at the state level and affected the costs for banks to open branches," Matray explains. "These regulatory changes led to a large increase in the number of bank branches in underserved counties, particularly in low-income and racially segregated counties. This provided us with an opportunity to examine how increased access to banking services affected financial inclusion and wealth accumulation."
The results were revealing: As banking services became more accessible, more low-income households opened accounts. "Our first result suggests that even in a well-developed financial market, low-income households are partly rationed by the supply of banking services," Matray notes. "In other words, many people remain unbanked not due to personal preference, but because banking services aren't sufficiently accessible in their communities."
The Wealth-Building Effect
The most striking finding, however, wasn't just that banking access increased financial inclusion—it was the dramatic effect on wealth accumulation. "Households with a bank account have wealth, excluding housing, around $6,900 higher than do unbanked households," Matray reports. "This is economically meaningful compared to the average wealth of $1,245 for unbanked households in our sample."
This wealth-building effect operated through several channels:
First, banked households accumulated more liquid assets in interest-bearing savings accounts, allowing their money to grow over time instead of sitting idle or being spent. This partially explains how financial inclusion can foster wealth accumulation among low-income households by allowing them to benefit from the effect of compound interest.
Second, they invested more in durable assets, particularly vehicles. Banked households were 56% more likely to own a vehicle and invested about $5,900 more in vehicles than their unbanked counterparts. This investment in reliable transportation expanded employment opportunities and earning potential. "The main durable assets low-income households invest in is their vehicle," Matray points out. "For many working families, reliable transportation is a crucial stepping stone to economic advancement."
Third, banked households had better access to credit, including vehicle loans and credit cards, allowing them to make investments that require large upfront payments while building their credit histories. This higher investment in durable goods partially stems from a better access to both nonhousing debt, in the form of vehicle and credit card debt. Such easier access to debt allowed households to make investments that require large upfront lump-sum payments.
Resilience in Hard Times
Perhaps most compelling was the finding that financial inclusion created economic resilience. When households experienced job loss or other income shocks, those with bank accounts were significantly less likely to fall behind on bills or experience financial hardship.
"While the probability of financial strain increases around 50% for unbanked households after a layoff, it remains stable for households with a bank account," Matray reports. "These results suggest that financial inclusion offers households useful tools to manage their personal finances and to have a financial cushion that absorbs negative income shocks."
This resilience benefit extended beyond the households themselves. Banked households were less likely to fall behind on rent payments during difficult times, creating positive spillover effects for landlords and the broader community. The fact that default on rent went down implies that financial inclusion might have positive effects beyond the directly affected households.
Supply-Side Solutions
The research challenges a common assumption that unbanked households simply prefer to operate outside the financial system. Instead, it suggests that many would benefit from and choose banking services if those services were more accessible and affordable.
This points to several potential policy approaches:
First, expanding physical access to banking services in underserved areas could increase financial inclusion. This might involve incentives for banks to open branches in low-income neighborhoods or support for community development financial institutions.
Second, addressing affordability barriers would help more people access banking services. This could include regulations limiting overdraft fees or promoting basic, low-cost bank accounts designed for lower-income customers.
"If low-income households benefit from financial inclusion but are constrained by the supply of banking services, through limited coverage of branches in poor areas, minimum account balances, or large overdraft fees, there is room and maybe even a need for policy intervention," Matray suggests.
Third, technological innovations like mobile banking could help overcome physical access barriers, especially if coupled with financial education to build trust and understanding of digital banking tools.
Moving Beyond the Cash Economy
The findings of Célerier and Matray's research show that financial inclusion provides essential tools for wealth accumulation and economic mobility, especially for vulnerable households.
As policymakers seek solutions to persistent poverty and growing economic inequality, expanding access to basic banking services offers a promising approach. Unlike many anti-poverty programs that focus solely on income support, financial inclusion empowers individuals to build wealth and resilience through their own saving and investment decisions.
The research makes clear that banking the unbanked isn't just about providing convenient services—it's about creating pathways to economic security and opportunity for millions of Americans currently operating in the financial shadows. By removing supply-side barriers to banking services, we can help more families build wealth, weather economic storms, and pursue their long-term financial goals.
Financial inclusion refers to the accessibility of financial services to all individuals, particularly those in low-income households, enabling them to participate in the financial system.
Economic resilience is the ability of a community or household to withstand and recover from economic shocks, such as job loss or financial hardship.
Alternative financial services include non-bank options like check-cashing services, payday loans, and money orders, often used by those without access to traditional banking.
Wealth accumulation is the process of increasing financial assets over time, often through savings, investments, and the use of interest-bearing accounts.
Hidden costs of being unbanked include fees for alternative financial services, lost opportunities for savings growth, and higher borrowing costs due to lack of credit history.
Explore more articles in the Banking category
