Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking and Finance Review

Global Banking & Finance Review

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Wealth
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release
    • Awards▾
      • About the Awards
      • Awards TimeTable
      • Submit Nominations
      • Testimonials
      • Media Room
      • Award Winners
      • FAQ

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2025 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved.

    ;
    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Top Stories

    Seller-Favorable Deal Environment Persists According to Seyfarth’s Middle-Market M&A Survey

    Seller-Favorable Deal Environment Persists According to Seyfarth’s Middle-Market M&A Survey

    Published by Gbaf News

    Posted on April 5, 2018

    Featured image for article about Top Stories

    Leading law firm Seyfarth Shaw LLP has published the 5th edition of its Middle-Market M&A SurveyBook of Key M&A Deal Terms (the “Survey”). The Survey analyzes over 120 middle-market (<$1 billion) publicly available private target acquisition agreements signed in 2017.

    The Survey focuses on key deal terms comprising the “indemnity package” included in almost all private target acquisition agreements to address a seller’s potential post-closing liability to a buyer, and set the parameters of a buyer’s ability to claw back purchase price from a seller.

    The data analyzed in this Survey suggests that, similar to the trend of recent years, the environment for private target middle-market M&A continues to be seller friendly. The purchase of representation and warranty (“R&W”) insurance continues to be a powerful tool used by buyers to make their acquisition proposal more attractive, and this year’s data indicated a significant increase in deals using R&W insurance. Of course, the terms of the typical indemnity package are greatly impacted when R&W insurance is utilized. For example, the indemnity escrow amount and indemnity cap size are typically drastically lower in transactions using R&W insurance as compared to transactions that do not use such insurance. Accordingly, Seyfarth’s Survey highlights the impact of R&W insurance on certain deal terms and separately addresses the results for deals not utilizing R&W insurance.

    In deals not using R&W insurance, this year’s Survey showed consistency with prior years for a number of deal terms with the general representation and warranty survival periods holding steady in the 12 -18 month range, continued high usage of true deductible indemnity baskets, and a median indemnity cap size of 10% of purchase price. To view Seyfarth’s 2018 Middle-Market M&A SurveyBook, please visit here.

    Leading law firm Seyfarth Shaw LLP has published the 5th edition of its Middle-Market M&A SurveyBook of Key M&A Deal Terms (the “Survey”). The Survey analyzes over 120 middle-market (<$1 billion) publicly available private target acquisition agreements signed in 2017.

    The Survey focuses on key deal terms comprising the “indemnity package” included in almost all private target acquisition agreements to address a seller’s potential post-closing liability to a buyer, and set the parameters of a buyer’s ability to claw back purchase price from a seller.

    The data analyzed in this Survey suggests that, similar to the trend of recent years, the environment for private target middle-market M&A continues to be seller friendly. The purchase of representation and warranty (“R&W”) insurance continues to be a powerful tool used by buyers to make their acquisition proposal more attractive, and this year’s data indicated a significant increase in deals using R&W insurance. Of course, the terms of the typical indemnity package are greatly impacted when R&W insurance is utilized. For example, the indemnity escrow amount and indemnity cap size are typically drastically lower in transactions using R&W insurance as compared to transactions that do not use such insurance. Accordingly, Seyfarth’s Survey highlights the impact of R&W insurance on certain deal terms and separately addresses the results for deals not utilizing R&W insurance.

    In deals not using R&W insurance, this year’s Survey showed consistency with prior years for a number of deal terms with the general representation and warranty survival periods holding steady in the 12 -18 month range, continued high usage of true deductible indemnity baskets, and a median indemnity cap size of 10% of purchase price. To view Seyfarth’s 2018 Middle-Market M&A SurveyBook, please visit here.

    Why waste money on news and opinions when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe