Connect with us

Finance

REGULATORY COSTS EXPECTED TO MORE THAN DOUBLE FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES FIRMS, ACCORDING TO SURVEY FROM DUFF & PHELPS

REGULATORY COSTS EXPECTED TO MORE THAN DOUBLE FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES FIRMS, ACCORDING TO SURVEY FROM DUFF & PHELPS

89% of asset managers, brokers and banks believe that regulations are increasing costs, and most believe that compliance spend could more than double in five years, according to a survey from professional services firm Duff & Phelps. The survey of nearly 200 senior financial services professionals shows that firms are typically spending 4% of their total revenue on compliance, and this could rise to 10% of revenue by 2022.

Despite this, firms are struggling to properly resource and comply with today’s financial regulation. For example, only 36% of firms who are subject to MiFID II are confident that they are on track to comply with the regulation by 3 January 2018.

What’s more, with new regulation increasing levels of personal accountability for compliance staff across the globe, the way compliance departments allocate their budget has changed. They are now not just counting for the costs of implementing financial regulation, but for the costs of hiring a replacement compliance officer or interim staff; for regulatory penalties and remediation in cases of failure; and for their own personal liability if things go wrong.

With financial regulation continuing to mount and the need for tighter cybersecurity rising on the agenda, firms are reassessing how to effectively allocate their resources to comply with financial regulation over the next five years. In a previous survey, Duff & Phelps found that nearly nine out of 10 (86%) financial services firms said they intend to increase the time and resources they spend on cybersecurity next year in anticipation of incoming regulation.

Julian Korek, Global Head of Compliance and Regulatory Consulting at Duff & Phelps, comments:

“The way that financial services firms allocate compliance budgets is changing. The pendulum is clearly swinging away from spending simply on financial regulation and moving towards the fight against cybercrime. Skyrocketing costs mean that firms have had to decide which regulations to prioritise, meaning that some will miss the already extended MiFIDII deadline. More guidance is needed from the regulator about how firms should allocate their time and money when complying with regulation, especially as the cost of Brexit, changes in US policy and cybercrime continue to emerge.”

Editorial & Advertiser disclosure
Our website provides you with information, news, press releases, Opinion and advertorials on various financial products and services. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third party websites, affiliate sales networks, and may link to our advertising partners websites. Though we are tied up with various advertising and affiliate networks, this does not affect our analysis or opinion. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you, or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a partner endorsed link.
Global Banking and Finance Review Awards Nominations 2021
2021 Awards now open. Click Here to Nominate

Recommended

Newsletters with Secrets & Analysis. Subscribe Now