Zia Hayat, CEO Callsign
Earlier this year, the Financial Ombudsman proclaimed that “it’s not fair” to automatically blame customers who find themselves as a casualty of banking fraud. The organisation came out with this statement as reports of scammers were soaring through the roof, as fraudulent techniques and tactics become ever more complex. If fact, scammers have reportedly been able to side-step standard security measures and use a victim’s money as they please on multiple occasions. So, how can banks respond to the Financial Ombudsman with new strategies and technology to keep their customers safe?
Fortunately, there have been efforts made to improve services and increase the range of deals available to banking customers in the form of regulation like Open Banking and PSD2. A subsection of the legislation requires banks to offer a new, stronger authentication process when their customers initiate a payment or request remote account access. Strong customer authentication, or SCA as it has come to be known, is designed to diminish online payment fraud as well as encourage banks to share their learnings and technology regarding fraud controls and authentication methods.
Unfortunately, SCA has fallen into a similar trap to that witnessed whenever a new piece of financial regulation is introduced – organisations are pushing back on the regulator because they are under too much press to comply and don’t have the capability and/or resources to do so in the given timeframe. The outcome of this is that exceptions are often made for organisations who can illustrate how they are handling the risks within certain guidelines. Consequently, these companies have the ability to bypass the early risks associated with non-compliance, without having to invest a considerable amount of time and money or affecting the service being delivered to their customer base. The knock-on effect of this is banks will always be on the backfoot in terms of regulatory changes because for each incremental change to regulations going forward will require a corresponding internal reaction.
Taking a reactive methodology can also be costly. There have been multiple cases when banks have chosen this approach only to find that when the time comes to comply, they do not have sufficient resources or technological capabilities to meet the new conditions. These organisations also put themselves at huge risk of fines and reduced customer confidence in the face of a non-compliance issue. In these scenarios, the company in question will need to then fulfill the required standards regardless.
It’s common for businesses to end up going down the costlier route by taking a short-term view and not accepting that a reasonable investment at the outset would be more fruitful over time. Customer experience can also suffer a detrimental impact through this approach because companies are forced to take a standardised catch-all approach to security which, in turn, increases friction during the transaction process. Yes, it important to keep the compliance team content, however, this shouldn’t be at the detriment to operations teams and CISO, who are left picking up the pieces of ongoing fraud cases and customer complaints.
Are we seeing banks caught in a Catch-22? On one hand, they must comply with the latest legislation without leaving their customers vulnerable to new types of fraud, while on the other, prove that they can maintain a positive customer experience. Furthermore, consumers prerogatives are also at loggerheads – they want to continue their digital lives by having a streamlined, user friendly banking experience without multiple security questions every time they want to conduct a transaction. Yet, at the same time they want to be rest assured that their money is protected and are keen to take the necessary steps to guarantee this is case. With a reported £731.8m lost in unauthorised financial fraud last year, it is clear that existing layers of security are not enough to protect consumers in this day and age.
So, what other layers need to be incorporated into the identification process? By uniting the benefits of both hard and soft biometrics with machine learning, banks are empowered to decide what methods are most suitable on a case-by-case basis. There is technology at hand which can analyse data about people’s behaviour, including facial recognition, typing or swiping techniques, and online habits, which when combined, has the ability to determine if someone’s behaviour is normal. If irregularities in the data are identified, then the bank is alerted so they can implement additional security measures. This form of identification has the added benefit that consumers can pick their preferred method of identification, removing the possibility of excluding a whole demographic as a result of restrictions on ability or technology. As a result, the static rules-based method that is regularly exploited by fraudsters can be circumvented.
Improved intelligence must also be utilised by financial services firms because banks will have a greater ability to protect their customers while concurrently offering the frictionless service they expect from a digital experience. As developments in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning technologies skyrocket, there a more tools than ever which can eliminate the requirement for additional means of authentication by utilising Secure User Authentication. Normally, users are asked to enter their personal details when conducting a transaction, but with this system, customer’s patterns and behaviour, such as their device (is the access request being made from an authorised device?), their location (where is the access request being made?), and behaviour (evaluating the user’s interaction via the log-in process, from the ‘style’ of their swipe to key strokes) is relied upon instead.
Banks have one thing on their side which offers a second-layer of unbreakable authentication – every individual interacts with their mobile device completely differently. That’s not to say that passwords are completely redundant, they will always have a place in the authentication process, however, we are now able to draw on more reliable and intelligent data points in order to identify people. Overall, we are making great steps towards a solution that decreases the amount of fraud, but it is the responsibility of banks to invest time and money to make sure they can break their Catch-22, leaving them more compliant without negatively impacting the overall user experience.
How banks can take on Google in the race for AI talent
By Nicola Sullivan, solutions director at candidate engagement tech firm Meet & Engage
The events of 2020 have made the battle for AI talent more ferocious than ever. In a volatile landscape where innovation is key, multinational firms are rolling up their sleeves for the inevitable scrum ahead.
For incumbent banks, the stakes are intimidatingly high. In one corner stand the fintech startups: the likes of Revolut and Monzo, who are snapping up AI-literate graduates while laying down pressure for capacity in exactly that area.
In the other corner, we find the Silicon Valley contenders of Amazon, Facebook and Google, who have phenomenal pay packages – not to mention glamour and visibility – on their side. And technologists with a finance background loom firmly in their crosshairs (Facebook employs hundreds of ex-banking recruits).
This unsettling picture is intensified by a chronic tech shortage: in a recent study by AI firm Peltarion, 83 percent of AI decision-makers agreed that a deficit of deep learning skills was seriously hampering their competitiveness. But, with the global impact of AI on financial services companies set to hit $140 billion in productivity gains and cost savings by 2025, banks need to find a way to break ahead and secure the AI talent they need. Here’s how:
Fish from a wider talent pool
We tend to think of AI in relation to a very niche set of qualifications. Yet in reality, it’s a fast-moving sphere that also requires a host of soft transferable skills such as problem-solving, agility, great communication and a sound analytical mind. In short, it’s less about what a candidate knows/does, and more to do with what they could know or do.
It’s worth thinking about whether you are being open-minded enough in your interpretation of tech talent. Do the AI roles you’re looking to fill need specific skills and criteria, or are they better suited to people who are inherently curious, intelligent and quick to learn?
Depending on the answer, you may want to expand your search from the bright young things of MIT or Berkeley to other related careers or older candidates with transferable skills. You may even want to look internally for the next generation of tech talent.
For example, if a bank’s customer-facing roles are declining but AI supply is not keeping up with demand, maybe this is a problem that could fix itself. The bank in question could run a two-week internal virtual AI internship to test interest, with the aim of rechanneling internal talent and avoiding redundancies. If AI is as critical as all forecasts suggest to the future of finance, investing in a more comprehensive approach like this may make a lot of sense.
Then there’s also the question of underrepresented groups. The proportion of black or latino people at major tech companies remains depressingly low, while women make up only a quarter of computing roles.
As well as driving equality, this issue of diversity is also a market gap that could be used for competitive advantage by banks. But doing so requires a deep-seated strategy that addresses the root reasons why candidates from these groups are turning away from tech. Issues such as lack of career development and accessible education need to be solved at ground level from the inside-out; an effort that begins before, or in tandem with, recruitment.
Make your recruitment process personal and transparent
When you’re fighting for top AI candidates who have the world at their fingertips, it’s not enough to bundle them through a generic Applicant Tracking System. You have to actively woo them, and get them on-side with your vision and community. This is especially important for millennials and Gen Z recruits, who are more purpose-driven than their predecessors.
Live online chat sessions hosted by high-profile speakers across the business is one tactic our banking clients have seen great success with here. For example, a shortlisted group of technologists get to meet with a bank’s CTO or Chief Human Resources Officer via a group chat (which they can join anonymously if they want to), to ask questions and find out more about a company’s technology roadmap and cultural ethos.
This is a rare opportunity to give candidates real takeaway value; even if they’re not thinking about leaving their current job, few will turn down the chance of time with the person who runs cybersecurity at a major bank. And this person will invariably be able to communicate a much better sense of culture than a third-party recruiter can.
Visibility is also important here: if you want to attract more BAME or female candidates, you need to have lead BAME or female technicians as a vocal part of the recruitment process, showing what success in your company looks like. If you don’t have people to fulfil these roles, you need to go back and address that rather than making empty statements.
Opening the doors to your company in this way is a winning strategy for tech candidates: it’s a “wrapper” to put around them and make them feel wanted, welcome and motivated – even when a recruitment process lasts a little longer than you’d like.
Talk like yourself but walk like a tech expert
Part of the openness needed to recruit key tech talent is about being authentic, too. There’s a tendency among some finance incumbents to “get down with the kids” and appear more like their disruptive competitors than they truly are. If you are a long-established brand in the banking world, with a good track record of developing careers, that alone is enough to attract AI technologists – you have a lot to offer, and you don’t need to put on a guise.
Equally, if you do have work to do in being more accessible to potential candidates, focus on real progression rather than image. This may mean putting through measures to build awareness and role modelling around recruitment diversity, or enhancing employee wellbeing.
With mental health issues on the rise in the workplace, a co-managed wellness programme of fitness and community events can make the difference between which way a candidate sways in a roomful of enticing options. This is especially true since banks – for all their boardrooms traditions – have a reputation amid technologists for a better, less brutal work-life balance than Silicon Valley.
Lastly, banks need to walk the walk when it comes to tech-enabled recruitment. However hard you try to make it personal, most candidate enrollments will involve a degree of automation at some stage – and it’s important to make that process as quick and slick as possible. For a candidate with consumer-grade tech experience, first impressions count: they want to know that this is a place that will recognise and nurture their skill set. So instead of a long, clunky application process, maybe consider a virtual assessment centre or a sophisticated chat bot, which can capture essential information in a fast, engaging way.
Recruiting the world’s top tech talent isn’t a question of magic or even necessarily a huge pay cheque. Instead you need to weave together these “micro-moments” that signal your bank’s character, integrity and technical ambition. Do this, and you stand a good chance of persuading leading AI candidates to skip the queue and come directly to you.
1.4 million customers to stop using bank branches due to COVID
8.4 million customers had already stopped visiting branches in person before lockdown
However, three quarters (74%) of customers will return to banking in branch after the pandemic
Of those who plan to return to branches, over two thirds (69%) will only return when they absolutely need to
A further 1.6 million (3%) said they don’t have an account with a high-street bank, meaning a total of 3 million Brits don’t have a need for physical branches.
This number may rise, as 8.4 (16%) million Brits had stopped using their bank’s branches before lockdown and are not sure if they will ever return.
However, not everyone has gone completely digital as 3 in 10 British banking customers (29%) have already returned to using their bank’s branches, with an additional 44% of customers planning to return soon.
Of these people who plan to return in the near future, over two thirds (69%) will only return when they absolutely need to and their problem cannot be solved online or over the phone.
While a third of those consumers (31%) are waiting for a COVID vaccine or treatment before they go back to their local branch.
This means that eventually, three-quarters of Brits (74%) will return to banking in-branch the way they did before lockdown.
However, they may face a longer journey than they previously did to find a branch. Data from ONS shows 25% of branches have closed in the UK since 2012 and this decline in branches is likely to continue if people follow through with their plans to avoid branches.
Customers in Northern Ireland will go back to banking in branches more so than those in any other region, with 85% of customers here saying they have already returned or plan to do so soon.
Interestingly, a quarter of customers (25%) in the East Midlands had already stopped banking in branches, making this the area with the most customers who no longer use branches.
Those in the North East are set to follow the same path as residents in the East Midlands, with 5% of customers in the North East saying they will stop using branches in the future.
To see the research in full visit: https://www.finder.com/uk/banking-branch-usage
Commenting on the findings, Jon Ostler, CEO at finder.com said:
“Lockdown has quickly changed many aspects of our lives and our banking behaviour was no different. Not being able to visit bank branches in person meant many consumers had no option but to start using online banking and bank’s mobile apps. These are generally easy to use and intuitive so you would expect some of these new converts to stay away from branches going forward.
“While the digital-only banks excel at their app offering, previous research we carried out found that sentiment towards these banks fell almost three times as much during lockdown than towards high street banks. This could be a sign that the quality of apps and online banking from high street banks is catching up.”
Finder commissioned Onepoll on 26 to 28 August 2020 to carry out a nationally representative survey of adults aged 18+. A total of 2,000 people were questioned throughout Great Britain, with representative quotas for gender, age and region.
Liquid Assets of a Bank
Liquid assets are tangible and movable assets which are easily convertible into cash in a crisis situation. Liquid assets are used by lenders to fund their loans. Examples of liquid assets include government bonds and central bank reserves.
To stay alive, financial institutions must have enough liquid funds to pay withdrawals and other immediate financial obligations by depositing holders of checks. But the amount of money they have in liquid form is not enough to cover these short-term obligations and their financial problems will become worse. Liquid assets of the financial institutions should be regularly replenished to make the banking system financially stable. In order to maintain a sufficient amount of money in the economy, the Federal Reserve System will always be in need of additional assets.
There are several ways in which the financial institutions can replenish their liquid assets. One of the ways is by borrowing funds from banks and credit unions. The other way is by issuing debt securities to provide liquidity for the monetary system.
Borrowing from banks and credit unions: Banks can borrow funds from other financial institutions in order to meet their liquidity requirements. However, the rate at which banks borrow funds from other financial institutions is usually very high. This high rate can only be beneficial for the financial institutions because the borrowed funds are used to purchase commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS). In return for providing CMBS, the banks can receive interest payments on the principal balance of the loans they have made to other financial institutions.
Issuing debt securities: The assets that a commercial bank or credit union secures as collateral for the loan from other financial institutions can also be used to liquidate its existing liquid assets. Usually, the assets used as collateral to secure loaned funds are Treasury securities, corporate bonds and treasury bills. However, as the value of these securities decreases, the banks’ ability to recover them through the redemption of their treasury bills and the federal income tax on the principal balance of these securities can increase the amount of funds they will have to pay out on short-term debts.
Securing debt securities: As mentioned above, the assets which commercial banks and credit unions can use to liquidate their liquid and non-liquid assets can also be used to secure loans made by them to other financial institutions. But it is important for the banks and credit unions to ensure that the funds they use to secure these loans are not used to purchase more securities. In order to obtain maximum gains from the sale of their assets, they should use a method to redeem the securities before the maturity date of the loan.
In addition to using these methods to secure other financial institutions’ loans, banks and credit unions can also sell their assets in order to raise the funds they need for making short-term payments. For example, if a commercial bank has a large inventory of commercial mortgage-backed securities, it may want to sell some of its assets in order to raise the capital required to make a single payment. If the purchase price of these assets is less than the total loan balance, the bank can sell its securities and cash in order to raise the necessary capital.
Although liquid and non-liquid assets can help the banking system to make its operations more stable, the loss of one type of asset can severely affect the financial condition of a bank or credit union. Therefore, even if there are many types of assets, it is important for the banks and credit unions to maintain a balanced level of liquidity in order to make sure that the economic system is not adversely affected by any one type of loss.
Adoption of tech in private markets lags behind industry trends
Nine out of ten financial institutions have accelerated their digitisation strategy as a result of Covid-19. Yet just 26% of...
Covid-19 disruption drives five new retail supply chain trends
The business disruption caused by COVID-19 has resulted in four out of five (82%) retailers changing their approach to stock...
Remote leadership anxieties
It’s a difficult time to be navigating the complex world of business. Whilst adapting to new ways of working remotely,...
Online jobs soar by 14% in third quarter 2020, Freelancer.com’s Fast 50 reports
Freelancer.com (ASX: FLN), the world’s largest freelancing and crowdsourcing marketplace by number of users and jobs posted, today released the...
One third of money management tools face closure by the end of the year if they do not embrace open banking
New research from Yolt Technology Services shows 35% of Personal Finance Managers aren’t using any open banking technology Imminent screen...
Pivoting growth strategy to rebuild consumer trust and confidence
By Richard Steggall, the CEO of Urban FT Trust is essential to all relationships, whether personal or professional. And in...
Everything you need to know about APIs for business
By Omar Javaid, president, Vonage API Platform, Vonage If your work brings you into close proximity with technology, chances are...
Accountants have become critical to the survival of businesses and their reputations during Covid-19
The opportunity for fraudulent activity to flourish as finance departments operate remotely with less oversight in these extraordinary Covid-19 times...
Unexplained Wealth Orders: Rightly Celebrated or Over-Rated?
By Nicola Sharp of financial crime specialists Rahman Ravelli considers the attention given to unexplained wealth orders – and emphasises...
Taking advantage of the UK’s renovation revolution
By Paresh Raja, CEO, Market Financial Solutions UK property is a popular asset class because of its historical resilience to...