Finance
German minister urges overhaul of EU green energy finance rules
Published by maria gbaf
Posted on January 28, 2022
Global Banking and Finance Review
Company
Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.
Published by maria gbaf
Posted on January 28, 2022
By Markus Wacket
BERLIN (Reuters) – Germany’s environment minister on Thursday called for a complete overall of proposed European Union rules on which types of energy should be labelled as green after Brussels policymakers ignored German objections to the inclusion of nuclear power.
The draft EU plan, published at the end of last year, that would classify investments in some natural gas and nuclear power as environmentally sustainable, has divided opinion in the 27-member EU bloc and among investors.
France, home to a globally important nuclear industry, supported the classification of nuclear energy as sustainable.
Some in the investment community also say labelling nuclear and natural gas as green investments would aid the low carbon evolution by encouraging financing for facilities to wean countries off the dirtiest fuels, chiefly coal.
But Germany, which decided to exit nuclear power entirely after the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster, opposed the move, saying that nuclear power was expensive and created a major problem of how to store radioactive waste.
“Given the significance of these questions there has to be a public consultation and a proper legislative process,” Steffi Lemke, a member of the ecologist Greens, told Reuters.
“That’s the only way of ensuring adequate involvement by the public, member states and European Parliament.”
The set of EU standards, known as a taxonomy, are meant to standardise disparate approaches to channel investment as the EU seeks to reduce carbon emissions to net zero by 2050.
Austria and Luxembourg have already mounted legal challenges to the European Commission’s decision, which still needs to be debated and ratified by EU member states.
The EU’s financial markets Commissioner Mairead McGuiness earlier told the Frankfurter Allgemeine newspaper that there would be no fundamental changes to the taxonomy, saying that the Commission had limited room for manoeuvre.
(Writing by Thomas Escritt; editing by Barbara Lewis)
By Markus Wacket
BERLIN (Reuters) – Germany’s environment minister on Thursday called for a complete overall of proposed European Union rules on which types of energy should be labelled as green after Brussels policymakers ignored German objections to the inclusion of nuclear power.
The draft EU plan, published at the end of last year, that would classify investments in some natural gas and nuclear power as environmentally sustainable, has divided opinion in the 27-member EU bloc and among investors.
France, home to a globally important nuclear industry, supported the classification of nuclear energy as sustainable.
Some in the investment community also say labelling nuclear and natural gas as green investments would aid the low carbon evolution by encouraging financing for facilities to wean countries off the dirtiest fuels, chiefly coal.
But Germany, which decided to exit nuclear power entirely after the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster, opposed the move, saying that nuclear power was expensive and created a major problem of how to store radioactive waste.
“Given the significance of these questions there has to be a public consultation and a proper legislative process,” Steffi Lemke, a member of the ecologist Greens, told Reuters.
“That’s the only way of ensuring adequate involvement by the public, member states and European Parliament.”
The set of EU standards, known as a taxonomy, are meant to standardise disparate approaches to channel investment as the EU seeks to reduce carbon emissions to net zero by 2050.
Austria and Luxembourg have already mounted legal challenges to the European Commission’s decision, which still needs to be debated and ratified by EU member states.
The EU’s financial markets Commissioner Mairead McGuiness earlier told the Frankfurter Allgemeine newspaper that there would be no fundamental changes to the taxonomy, saying that the Commission had limited room for manoeuvre.
(Writing by Thomas Escritt; editing by Barbara Lewis)