BlackRock to give clients more say on holding companies to account

By Simon Jessop and Ross Kerber

LONDON/BOSTON (Reuters) -BlackRock Inc plans to give large clients more of a say on ballots cast at company annual meetings, a move that some industry experts predicted could result in companies facing more opposition from rebellious shareholders.

BlackRock – the world’s largest money manager with $9.5 trillion in assets – typically casts the votes of shares on behalf of investors in its funds, making it one of Wall Street’s most influential voices on matters ranging from corporate director elections to climate change and workforce diversity.

From next year, however, certain institutional account holders will be able to vote themselves about 40% of the $4.8 trillion in assets held in BlackRock’s equity index strategies, BlackRock said in a letter to clients.

Others could choose to pick a third-party voting policy and use BlackRock to submit the votes.

The changes could lead to companies finding it more difficult to push through their choices at shareholder votes because it will give more say to many institutional investors that often have tougher corporate governance voting policies, such as big pension funds and endowments, said Matt DiGuiseppe, vice president at corporate governance software firm Diligent.

“I expect this will have a significantly negative impact on the level of support that (a company’s) management receives,” DiGuiseppe said.

Not all industry insiders agreed.

Bruce Goldfarb, president of proxy solicitor Okapi Partners LLC, said he expected the changes would only have a marginal impact.

“I doubt many investors in BlackRock-managed products have policies that are too different from the well-crafted policies already set out by BlackRock and executed by its investment stewardship team,” Goldfarb said.

In any case the move makes business sense for BlackRock, said James McRitchie, a private investor who files many shareholder resolutions, as more investors look to the social impact of their portfolios.

“More people are viewing their investments as engagement mechanisms, not just bets on winning alpha,” or higher returns, he said.

The choice to cast a shareholder vote at companies would be offered in some index strategies held within separately managed accounts and certain pooled funds in Britain and the United States, BlackRock said.

“These options are designed to enable you to have a greater say in proxy voting, if that is important to you,” BlackRock’s letter said. BlackRock aims to add voting choices to more investment products, according to the letter.

A massive surge of money into low-cost index funds has left BlackRock frequently owning 5% or more of top corporations. The firm and its rivals traditionally deferred to companies’ recommendations on shareholder votes, though this has started to change.

This year under a new stewardship chief, BlackRock opposed directors and backed climate resolutions more often, although it continued to support management pay 95% of the time at U.S. companies.

Jill Fisch, a University of Pennsylvania law professor, praised BlackRock’s changes for allowing pension funds and other big asset owners to have more say over corporate decisions and said rival fund managers might move in a similar direction at least for U.S. investors.

“Big asset managers try to do a good job, but they’re not the people I want running the country,” Fisch said.

(Reporting by Simon Jessop in London and Ross Kerber in BostonAdditional reporting by Svea Herbst-Bayliss in Boston. Editing by Greg Roumeliotis and Steve Orlofsky)

By Simon Jessop and Ross Kerber

LONDON/BOSTON (Reuters) -BlackRock Inc plans to give large clients more of a say on ballots cast at company annual meetings, a move that some industry experts predicted could result in companies facing more opposition from rebellious shareholders.

BlackRock – the world’s largest money manager with $9.5 trillion in assets – typically casts the votes of shares on behalf of investors in its funds, making it one of Wall Street’s most influential voices on matters ranging from corporate director elections to climate change and workforce diversity.

From next year, however, certain institutional account holders will be able to vote themselves about 40% of the $4.8 trillion in assets held in BlackRock’s equity index strategies, BlackRock said in a letter to clients.

Others could choose to pick a third-party voting policy and use BlackRock to submit the votes.

The changes could lead to companies finding it more difficult to push through their choices at shareholder votes because it will give more say to many institutional investors that often have tougher corporate governance voting policies, such as big pension funds and endowments, said Matt DiGuiseppe, vice president at corporate governance software firm Diligent.

“I expect this will have a significantly negative impact on the level of support that (a company’s) management receives,” DiGuiseppe said.

Not all industry insiders agreed.

Bruce Goldfarb, president of proxy solicitor Okapi Partners LLC, said he expected the changes would only have a marginal impact.

“I doubt many investors in BlackRock-managed products have policies that are too different from the well-crafted policies already set out by BlackRock and executed by its investment stewardship team,” Goldfarb said.

In any case the move makes business sense for BlackRock, said James McRitchie, a private investor who files many shareholder resolutions, as more investors look to the social impact of their portfolios.

“More people are viewing their investments as engagement mechanisms, not just bets on winning alpha,” or higher returns, he said.

The choice to cast a shareholder vote at companies would be offered in some index strategies held within separately managed accounts and certain pooled funds in Britain and the United States, BlackRock said.

“These options are designed to enable you to have a greater say in proxy voting, if that is important to you,” BlackRock’s letter said. BlackRock aims to add voting choices to more investment products, according to the letter.

A massive surge of money into low-cost index funds has left BlackRock frequently owning 5% or more of top corporations. The firm and its rivals traditionally deferred to companies’ recommendations on shareholder votes, though this has started to change.

This year under a new stewardship chief, BlackRock opposed directors and backed climate resolutions more often, although it continued to support management pay 95% of the time at U.S. companies.

Jill Fisch, a University of Pennsylvania law professor, praised BlackRock’s changes for allowing pension funds and other big asset owners to have more say over corporate decisions and said rival fund managers might move in a similar direction at least for U.S. investors.

“Big asset managers try to do a good job, but they’re not the people I want running the country,” Fisch said.

(Reporting by Simon Jessop in London and Ross Kerber in BostonAdditional reporting by Svea Herbst-Bayliss in Boston. Editing by Greg Roumeliotis and Steve Orlofsky)