Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Banking
    3. >BANKS FOUND TO BE PAYING 352% MARK-UP ON TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS
    Banking

    Banks Found to Be Paying 352% Mark-Up on Technology Products

    Published by Gbaf News

    Posted on October 10, 2017

    5 min read

    Last updated: January 21, 2026

    Add as preferred source on Google
    The image illustrates the OECD's updated growth forecast for the UK economy in 2025, reflecting increased government spending and high inflation rates. This visual supports the article's analysis of Britain's economic outlook.
    UK economy growth forecast graphic highlighting 2025 acceleration - Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Brexit and currency confusion has helped suppliers maximise profits 

    IT suppliers managed to seize on chaotic price inflation following the Brexit vote to maximise their profits, according to the annual KnowledgeBus IT Margins Benchmarking Study.

    Now in its fifth year, the study reveals the average margins charged by suppliers across the 29 different sectors. In the previous four years, the report has shown buyers becoming shrewder about IT purchases – with a gradual reduction in the average mark-up being paid to suppliers each year.

    Industry best practice, as specified by the Society of IT Managers, states that organisations should not pay more than a 3% margin to suppliers. However, this year’s study revealed that those margins had risen for the first time ever – up to 18% from 17.6% the previous year.

    The average margin paid by the banking sector was found to have increased to 18% in 2016, up from 14% in 2015.

    Al Nagar, head of benchmarking at KnowledgeBus, explains that many suppliers were able to increase their mark-ups due to the confusion caused by Brexit. He said: “The result of the vote certainly caused a shock to IT prices seldom seen before, and it appears to have disrupted buyers’ attempts to keep supplier margins under control.”

    In the most extreme examples, several organisations were found to have paid more than ten times the trade price for products. One buyer in the banking sector paid an extortionate mark-up of 352% – over three times the trade price.

    Al adds: “Although there was a period of rapid inflation in the tech market not all prices increased. Some product prices stayed the same and some went down. But what we witnessed was unscrupulous suppliers taking advantage of the perception that price increases were going up across the board. Many organisations – without the tools to check what was really happening in the market – were caught out by these actions.”

    Analysis of the margins paid showed that even the most vigilant were caught out by rapidly fluctuating prices in 2016. This year’s best performing sector, the police, paid out an average of just 11% for its IT purchases. Yet one buyer in this sector still paid a supplier a 970% margin for an order of flash drives.

    Buyers will have found it harder to monitor fair price levels last year due to a sharp fall in the value of the pound. A study by KnowledgeBus towards the end of 2016, found this caused prices to increase by an average 12.7% in the months following the Brexit vote – with some vendors putting up prices by as much as 45%.

    Brexit and currency confusion has helped suppliers maximise profits 

    IT suppliers managed to seize on chaotic price inflation following the Brexit vote to maximise their profits, according to the annual KnowledgeBus IT Margins Benchmarking Study.

    Now in its fifth year, the study reveals the average margins charged by suppliers across the 29 different sectors. In the previous four years, the report has shown buyers becoming shrewder about IT purchases – with a gradual reduction in the average mark-up being paid to suppliers each year.

    Industry best practice, as specified by the Society of IT Managers, states that organisations should not pay more than a 3% margin to suppliers. However, this year’s study revealed that those margins had risen for the first time ever – up to 18% from 17.6% the previous year.

    The average margin paid by the banking sector was found to have increased to 18% in 2016, up from 14% in 2015.

    Al Nagar, head of benchmarking at KnowledgeBus, explains that many suppliers were able to increase their mark-ups due to the confusion caused by Brexit. He said: “The result of the vote certainly caused a shock to IT prices seldom seen before, and it appears to have disrupted buyers’ attempts to keep supplier margins under control.”

    In the most extreme examples, several organisations were found to have paid more than ten times the trade price for products. One buyer in the banking sector paid an extortionate mark-up of 352% – over three times the trade price.

    Al adds: “Although there was a period of rapid inflation in the tech market not all prices increased. Some product prices stayed the same and some went down. But what we witnessed was unscrupulous suppliers taking advantage of the perception that price increases were going up across the board. Many organisations – without the tools to check what was really happening in the market – were caught out by these actions.”

    Analysis of the margins paid showed that even the most vigilant were caught out by rapidly fluctuating prices in 2016. This year’s best performing sector, the police, paid out an average of just 11% for its IT purchases. Yet one buyer in this sector still paid a supplier a 970% margin for an order of flash drives.

    Buyers will have found it harder to monitor fair price levels last year due to a sharp fall in the value of the pound. A study by KnowledgeBus towards the end of 2016, found this caused prices to increase by an average 12.7% in the months following the Brexit vote – with some vendors putting up prices by as much as 45%.

    More from Banking

    Explore more articles in the Banking category

    Image for Nominate Today for the Leadership Awards 2026
    Nominate Today for the Leadership Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entries for Insurance & Takaful Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entries for Insurance & Takaful Awards 2026
    Image for Calling for Entries: ESG & Sustainability Awards 2026
    Calling for Entries: ESG & Sustainability Awards 2026
    Image for Call for Entries: Deal of the Year Awards 2026
    Call for Entries: Deal of the Year Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Customer Service Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Customer Service Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for CSR Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for CSR Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Retail Banking Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Retail Banking Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Open for Islamic Banking Awards 2026
    Nominations Open for Islamic Banking Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Fund & Asset Management Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Fund & Asset Management Awards 2026
    Image for Entries Open for Forex Banking Awards 2026
    Entries Open for Forex Banking Awards 2026
    Image for Call for Entries for Brand of the Year Awards 2026
    Call for Entries for Brand of the Year Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Open for Corporate Banking Awards 2026
    Nominations Open for Corporate Banking Awards 2026
    View All Banking Posts
    Previous Banking PostResearch Shows UK Consumers Feel Short-Changed, as Banks Transform for a New Generation of Tech-Savvy Users
    Next Banking PostBanks May Be Onto a Winner if They Can Focus on the Innovation Aspects of PSD2 at Least as Much as the Compliance