Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release
    • Awards▾
      • About the Awards
      • Awards TimeTable
      • Submit Nominations
      • Testimonials
      • Media Room
      • Award Winners
      • FAQ
    • Magazines▾
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 79
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 78
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 77
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 76
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 75
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 73
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 71
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 70
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 69
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 66
    Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2026 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags | Developed By eCorpIT

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Home > Banking > BANKS FOUND TO BE PAYING 352% MARK-UP ON TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS
    Banking

    BANKS FOUND TO BE PAYING 352% MARK-UP ON TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS

    Published by Gbaf News

    Posted on October 10, 2017

    5 min read

    Last updated: January 21, 2026

    The image illustrates the OECD's updated growth forecast for the UK economy in 2025, reflecting increased government spending and high inflation rates. This visual supports the article's analysis of Britain's economic outlook.
    UK economy growth forecast graphic highlighting 2025 acceleration - Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Brexit and currency confusion has helped suppliers maximise profits 

    IT suppliers managed to seize on chaotic price inflation following the Brexit vote to maximise their profits, according to the annual KnowledgeBus IT Margins Benchmarking Study.

    Now in its fifth year, the study reveals the average margins charged by suppliers across the 29 different sectors. In the previous four years, the report has shown buyers becoming shrewder about IT purchases – with a gradual reduction in the average mark-up being paid to suppliers each year.

    Industry best practice, as specified by the Society of IT Managers, states that organisations should not pay more than a 3% margin to suppliers. However, this year’s study revealed that those margins had risen for the first time ever – up to 18% from 17.6% the previous year.

    The average margin paid by the banking sector was found to have increased to 18% in 2016, up from 14% in 2015.

    Al Nagar, head of benchmarking at KnowledgeBus, explains that many suppliers were able to increase their mark-ups due to the confusion caused by Brexit. He said: “The result of the vote certainly caused a shock to IT prices seldom seen before, and it appears to have disrupted buyers’ attempts to keep supplier margins under control.”

    In the most extreme examples, several organisations were found to have paid more than ten times the trade price for products. One buyer in the banking sector paid an extortionate mark-up of 352% – over three times the trade price.

    Al adds: “Although there was a period of rapid inflation in the tech market not all prices increased. Some product prices stayed the same and some went down. But what we witnessed was unscrupulous suppliers taking advantage of the perception that price increases were going up across the board. Many organisations – without the tools to check what was really happening in the market – were caught out by these actions.”

    Analysis of the margins paid showed that even the most vigilant were caught out by rapidly fluctuating prices in 2016. This year’s best performing sector, the police, paid out an average of just 11% for its IT purchases. Yet one buyer in this sector still paid a supplier a 970% margin for an order of flash drives.

    Buyers will have found it harder to monitor fair price levels last year due to a sharp fall in the value of the pound. A study by KnowledgeBus towards the end of 2016, found this caused prices to increase by an average 12.7% in the months following the Brexit vote – with some vendors putting up prices by as much as 45%.

    Brexit and currency confusion has helped suppliers maximise profits 

    IT suppliers managed to seize on chaotic price inflation following the Brexit vote to maximise their profits, according to the annual KnowledgeBus IT Margins Benchmarking Study.

    Now in its fifth year, the study reveals the average margins charged by suppliers across the 29 different sectors. In the previous four years, the report has shown buyers becoming shrewder about IT purchases – with a gradual reduction in the average mark-up being paid to suppliers each year.

    Industry best practice, as specified by the Society of IT Managers, states that organisations should not pay more than a 3% margin to suppliers. However, this year’s study revealed that those margins had risen for the first time ever – up to 18% from 17.6% the previous year.

    The average margin paid by the banking sector was found to have increased to 18% in 2016, up from 14% in 2015.

    Al Nagar, head of benchmarking at KnowledgeBus, explains that many suppliers were able to increase their mark-ups due to the confusion caused by Brexit. He said: “The result of the vote certainly caused a shock to IT prices seldom seen before, and it appears to have disrupted buyers’ attempts to keep supplier margins under control.”

    In the most extreme examples, several organisations were found to have paid more than ten times the trade price for products. One buyer in the banking sector paid an extortionate mark-up of 352% – over three times the trade price.

    Al adds: “Although there was a period of rapid inflation in the tech market not all prices increased. Some product prices stayed the same and some went down. But what we witnessed was unscrupulous suppliers taking advantage of the perception that price increases were going up across the board. Many organisations – without the tools to check what was really happening in the market – were caught out by these actions.”

    Analysis of the margins paid showed that even the most vigilant were caught out by rapidly fluctuating prices in 2016. This year’s best performing sector, the police, paid out an average of just 11% for its IT purchases. Yet one buyer in this sector still paid a supplier a 970% margin for an order of flash drives.

    Buyers will have found it harder to monitor fair price levels last year due to a sharp fall in the value of the pound. A study by KnowledgeBus towards the end of 2016, found this caused prices to increase by an average 12.7% in the months following the Brexit vote – with some vendors putting up prices by as much as 45%.

    More from Banking

    Explore more articles in the Banking category

    Image for Latin Securities Named Winner of Two Prestigious 2026 Global Banking & Finance Awards
    Latin Securities Named Winner of Two Prestigious 2026 Global Banking & Finance Awards
    Image for Pix at five years: how Brazil built one of the world’s most advanced public payments infrastructures - and why other countries are paying attention
    Pix at five years: how Brazil built one of the world’s most advanced public payments infrastructures - and why other countries are paying attention
    Image for Idle Stablecoins Are Becoming a Systemic Efficiency Problem — and Banks Should Pay Attention
    Idle Stablecoins Are Becoming a Systemic Efficiency Problem — and Banks Should Pay Attention
    Image for Banking Without Boundaries: A More Practical Approach to Global Banking
    Banking Without Boundaries: A More Practical Approach to Global Banking
    Image for Lessons From the Ring and the Deal Table: How Boxing Shapes Steven Nigro’s Approach to Banking and Life
    Lessons From the Ring and the Deal Table: How Boxing Shapes Steven Nigro’s Approach to Banking and Life
    Image for The Key to Unlocking ROI from GenAI
    The Key to Unlocking ROI from GenAI
    Image for The Changing Landscape of Small Business Lending: What Traditional Finance Models Miss
    The Changing Landscape of Small Business Lending: What Traditional Finance Models Miss
    Image for VestoFX.net Expands Education-Oriented Content as Focus on Risk Awareness Grows in CFD Trading
    VestoFX.net Expands Education-Oriented Content as Focus on Risk Awareness Grows in CFD Trading
    Image for The Hybrid Banking Model That Digital-Only Providers Cannot Match
    The Hybrid Banking Model That Digital-Only Providers Cannot Match
    Image for INTERPOLITAN MONEY ANNOUNCES RECORD GROWTH ACROSS 2025
    INTERPOLITAN MONEY ANNOUNCES RECORD GROWTH ACROSS 2025
    Image for Alter Bank Wins Two Prestigious Awards in the 2025 Global Banking & Finance Awards®
    Alter Bank Wins Two Prestigious Awards in the 2025 Global Banking & Finance Awards®
    Image for CIBC wins two Global Banking and Finance Awards for student banking
    CIBC wins two Global Banking and Finance Awards for student banking
    View All Banking Posts
    Previous Banking PostRESEARCH SHOWS UK CONSUMERS FEEL SHORT-CHANGED, AS BANKS TRANSFORM FOR A NEW GENERATION OF TECH-SAVVY USERS
    Next Banking PostBANKS MAY BE ONTO A WINNER IF THEY CAN FOCUS ON THE INNOVATION ASPECTS OF PSD2 AT LEAST AS MUCH AS THE COMPLIANCE