Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking and Finance Review

Global Banking & Finance Review

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Wealth
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release
    • Awards▾
      • About the Awards
      • Awards TimeTable
      • Submit Nominations
      • Testimonials
      • Media Room
      • Award Winners
      • FAQ

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2025 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved.

    ;
    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Banking

    BANKS ARE NOT DOING ENOUGH FOR THEIR CUSTOMERS

    BANKS ARE NOT DOING ENOUGH FOR THEIR CUSTOMERS

    Published by Gbaf News

    Posted on January 16, 2018

    Featured image for article about Banking

    The banking industry features in the top three UK sectors that are offering ‘good’ customer service – but it could be better!

    Today’s consumers are increasingly accustomed to swift query response, across multiple channels and according to recent research the majority of sectors in the UK are falling well short of providing ‘excellent’ contactability to their customers and prospects, however, the banking industry places in the top three.

    The research commissioned by Yonder Digital Group canvassed 2,000 UK consumers, asking whether they felt that companies in a range of sectors were easy to get in touch with and efficient at getting queries resolved rapidly and effectively. Even though the banking industry featured in the top three, the research results show that this sector still has a lot of space for improvement.

    It emerged that banking firms are the best of a bad bunch with 34% of consumers rating the ease of contact standard as ‘good’ but only 24% as excellent and 15% as poor.  This is a particularly worrying result considering that previous Yonder research showed that 81% of consumers simply take their business elsewhere if their queries aren’t answered quickly and effectively by a company. For this reason it’s risky for the banking sector to continue overlooking their levels of ‘contactability’.

    SECTOR Ease of Contact standard
    Excellent Good Basic Poor
    Online-only retailers 25% 33% 28% 15%
    Banks 24% 34% 28% 15%
    Hotels 23% 37% 31% 10%
    Supermarkets 19% 34% 33% 13%
    Mobile phone companies 17% 33% 33% 17%
    Utility companies 17% 33% 32% 19%
    Internet providers 16% 31% 34% 19%
    Insurance companies 16% 32% 37% 16%
    DIY stores 13% 29% 42% 16%
    Fashion shops 12% 29% 41% 19%
    Car brands 11% 24% 46% 19%
    Delivery firms 10% 27% 39% 24%
    Airlines 10% 26% 41% 23%

     

    Chris Robinson, Yonder Digital Group CEO, comments, “Customers have individual preferences for contacting companies, which is why businesses lose out when they don’t offer a range of touch points. At crucial moments in the journey to purchase, many customers will look for a live agent, particularly for urgent or non-standard queries. Businesses that fail to provide support at these critical stages risk losing customers to competitors with superior support services. As the results show, a large proportion of companies are still falling well below the mark, suggesting there is a long way to go for UK industries to catch up with modern expectations.”

    The banking industry features in the top three UK sectors that are offering ‘good’ customer service – but it could be better!

    Today’s consumers are increasingly accustomed to swift query response, across multiple channels and according to recent research the majority of sectors in the UK are falling well short of providing ‘excellent’ contactability to their customers and prospects, however, the banking industry places in the top three.

    The research commissioned by Yonder Digital Group canvassed 2,000 UK consumers, asking whether they felt that companies in a range of sectors were easy to get in touch with and efficient at getting queries resolved rapidly and effectively. Even though the banking industry featured in the top three, the research results show that this sector still has a lot of space for improvement.

    It emerged that banking firms are the best of a bad bunch with 34% of consumers rating the ease of contact standard as ‘good’ but only 24% as excellent and 15% as poor.  This is a particularly worrying result considering that previous Yonder research showed that 81% of consumers simply take their business elsewhere if their queries aren’t answered quickly and effectively by a company. For this reason it’s risky for the banking sector to continue overlooking their levels of ‘contactability’.

    SECTOREase of Contact standard
    ExcellentGoodBasicPoor
    Online-only retailers25%33%28%15%
    Banks24%34%28%15%
    Hotels23%37%31%10%
    Supermarkets19%34%33%13%
    Mobile phone companies17%33%33%17%
    Utility companies17%33%32%19%
    Internet providers16%31%34%19%
    Insurance companies16%32%37%16%
    DIY stores13%29%42%16%
    Fashion shops12%29%41%19%
    Car brands11%24%46%19%
    Delivery firms10%27%39%24%
    Airlines10%26%41%23%

     

    Chris Robinson, Yonder Digital Group CEO, comments, “Customers have individual preferences for contacting companies, which is why businesses lose out when they don’t offer a range of touch points. At crucial moments in the journey to purchase, many customers will look for a live agent, particularly for urgent or non-standard queries. Businesses that fail to provide support at these critical stages risk losing customers to competitors with superior support services. As the results show, a large proportion of companies are still falling well below the mark, suggesting there is a long way to go for UK industries to catch up with modern expectations.”

    Why waste money on news and opinions when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe