Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release
    • Awards▾
      • About the Awards
      • Awards TimeTable
      • Submit Nominations
      • Testimonials
      • Media Room
      • Award Winners
      • FAQ
    • Magazines▾
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 79
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 78
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 77
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 76
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 75
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 73
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 71
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 70
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 69
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 66
    Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2026 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags | Developed By eCorpIT

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Home > Investing > SEEING THE RED FLAGS IN A TECH STARTUP INVESTMENT PITCH
    Investing

    SEEING THE RED FLAGS IN A TECH STARTUP INVESTMENT PITCH

    Published by Gbaf News

    Posted on August 29, 2013

    7 min read

    Last updated: January 22, 2026

    A Boeing 737-800 aircraft crashed at Muan International Airport, killing at least 28. The incident highlights aviation safety concerns and emergency responses in South Korea.
    Boeing 737-800 crash at Muan International Airport in South Korea - Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    By Cameron Chell CEO, Podium Ventures

    Cameron Chell

    Cameron Chell

    Not every presentation that you witness is going to be spearheaded by the consummate showman. The truth is, even the best products are sometimes fronted by poor pitches. It’s an art form that very few ever truly master.

    Especially when it comes to startups, the presentation is all about selling the sizzle and trying to keep the steak out of view. Most of the time, this is due to the fact that the product is still in a conceptual stage and the startup itself only really has “potential” to sell. Even when that’s the case, there are a number of red flags that investors should be on the lookout for during pitches, whether they’re dealing with the consummate showman or a technical founder who has only just ventured into daylight.

    What Are The Actionable Steps?

    Commonly referred to as the ‘Use of Proceeds’ in a pitch, this tends to be nothing more than a single page in a PowerPoint presentation , offering a basic summary of what the money raised will be used for. This can be a problem for investors. $750,000 allocated to ‘Business Development’ might seem reasonable to the Entrepreneur, it might even be realistic but, if there is no further insight that supports that figure, how can an investor move forward? And why would they want to?

    Numbers without definition and context can quickly become the downfall of a presentation. Is a section of the money raised being denoted towards Marketing? If so, what is the customer acquisition strategy? A good investment pitch highlights not only the Use of Proceeds, but gives key, actionable steps that will be undertaken to ensure the money raised is used in the best way possible.

    These steps aren’t set in stone, but if they aren’t included in the pitch, it essentially means the company isn’t thinking about them. If they aren’t thinking about them, it means they are being reactionary with investor money which is always dangerous.

    What Are The Imposed Deadlines?

    Having actionable items is incredibly important in the development of a startup and knowing the tactical steps necessary to get from Point A to Point B can make or break an early stage company. This is something an investor should always be wary of.

    When a startup and their founding team are giving a pitch, knowing when something is going to be accomplished is just as important as knowing what is going to be done. It’s comforting to know that, with the money raised, a startup plans to go from their current point A to point B and in what timeframe. If there aren’t imposed deadlines on tactical operations then the Use of Proceeds once again becomes flimsy and little more than a placeholder.

    Getting to Point B may involve substantial time and effort which is understandable in a growing startup. Investors should expect pain points and setbacks along the way as it is part of the natural evolution of a startup. What investors want to see, however, is a development timeline highlighting important, tactical milestones the startup needs to accomplish.

    Have They Validated?

    Startups exist to solve pain points. A good startup team will have recognized a market opportunity and found out where they can fit into the niche and begun growing their business.

    Even in early stages, companies should be focused on understanding what they are solving. Having a product or service is important, but being able to accurately solve real pain points of people in the market, is what brings success. Early stage companies can adapt and pivot far faster than their larger corporate cousins, interacting with the market in an entirely different way.

    Early customer communications can make or break a startup. If no feedback is being sought and startups aren’t focused on growth in a way which echoes customer feedback, the startup will falter. If they’re taking customer feedback seriously, chances are they’ll talk about the customer acquisition and growth models in their pitches. If it is conspicuously absent, it should act as a warning flag.

    By Cameron Chell CEO, Podium Ventures

    Cameron Chell

    Cameron Chell

    Not every presentation that you witness is going to be spearheaded by the consummate showman. The truth is, even the best products are sometimes fronted by poor pitches. It’s an art form that very few ever truly master.

    Especially when it comes to startups, the presentation is all about selling the sizzle and trying to keep the steak out of view. Most of the time, this is due to the fact that the product is still in a conceptual stage and the startup itself only really has “potential” to sell. Even when that’s the case, there are a number of red flags that investors should be on the lookout for during pitches, whether they’re dealing with the consummate showman or a technical founder who has only just ventured into daylight.

    What Are The Actionable Steps?

    Commonly referred to as the ‘Use of Proceeds’ in a pitch, this tends to be nothing more than a single page in a PowerPoint presentation , offering a basic summary of what the money raised will be used for. This can be a problem for investors. $750,000 allocated to ‘Business Development’ might seem reasonable to the Entrepreneur, it might even be realistic but, if there is no further insight that supports that figure, how can an investor move forward? And why would they want to?

    Numbers without definition and context can quickly become the downfall of a presentation. Is a section of the money raised being denoted towards Marketing? If so, what is the customer acquisition strategy? A good investment pitch highlights not only the Use of Proceeds, but gives key, actionable steps that will be undertaken to ensure the money raised is used in the best way possible.

    These steps aren’t set in stone, but if they aren’t included in the pitch, it essentially means the company isn’t thinking about them. If they aren’t thinking about them, it means they are being reactionary with investor money which is always dangerous.

    What Are The Imposed Deadlines?

    Having actionable items is incredibly important in the development of a startup and knowing the tactical steps necessary to get from Point A to Point B can make or break an early stage company. This is something an investor should always be wary of.

    When a startup and their founding team are giving a pitch, knowing when something is going to be accomplished is just as important as knowing what is going to be done. It’s comforting to know that, with the money raised, a startup plans to go from their current point A to point B and in what timeframe. If there aren’t imposed deadlines on tactical operations then the Use of Proceeds once again becomes flimsy and little more than a placeholder.

    Getting to Point B may involve substantial time and effort which is understandable in a growing startup. Investors should expect pain points and setbacks along the way as it is part of the natural evolution of a startup. What investors want to see, however, is a development timeline highlighting important, tactical milestones the startup needs to accomplish.

    Have They Validated?

    Startups exist to solve pain points. A good startup team will have recognized a market opportunity and found out where they can fit into the niche and begun growing their business.

    Even in early stages, companies should be focused on understanding what they are solving. Having a product or service is important, but being able to accurately solve real pain points of people in the market, is what brings success. Early stage companies can adapt and pivot far faster than their larger corporate cousins, interacting with the market in an entirely different way.

    Early customer communications can make or break a startup. If no feedback is being sought and startups aren’t focused on growth in a way which echoes customer feedback, the startup will falter. If they’re taking customer feedback seriously, chances are they’ll talk about the customer acquisition and growth models in their pitches. If it is conspicuously absent, it should act as a warning flag.

    More from Investing

    Explore more articles in the Investing category

    Image for Understanding the Factors Shaping Bitcoin’s Current Market Conditions
    Understanding the Factors Shaping Bitcoin’s Current Market Conditions
    Image for Understanding Investment Management Consulting Services in the U.S. Market
    Understanding Investment Management Consulting Services in the U.S. Market
    Image for The Role of DST Sponsors and Service Providers in Delaware Statutory Trusts
    The Role of DST Sponsors and Service Providers in Delaware Statutory Trusts
    Image for Understanding Self-Directed IRA Structures and Platform Models
    Understanding Self-Directed IRA Structures and Platform Models
    Image for 1031 Exchanges and Delaware Statutory Trusts: What Investors Need to Know
    1031 Exchanges and Delaware Statutory Trusts: What Investors Need to Know
    Image for Excellence in Innovation – Strategic Investment & Economic Transformation Egypt 2025
    Excellence in Innovation – Strategic Investment & Economic Transformation Egypt 2025
    Image for What Is the Average Pension Pot in the UK? (By Age)
    What Is the Average Pension Pot in the UK? (By Age)
    Image for From Money Printing to Market Surge: The Macro Forces Driving Crypto in 2026
    From Money Printing to Market Surge: The Macro Forces Driving Crypto in 2026
    Image for  Millennials Aren’t Ignoring Retirement. They’re Rebuilding It.
    Millennials Aren’t Ignoring Retirement. They’re Rebuilding It.
    Image for BridgeWise Launches FixedWise, the First AI Solution Bringing Granular Bond Intelligence to the European Market
    BridgeWise Launches FixedWise, the First AI Solution Bringing Granular Bond Intelligence to the European Market
    Image for Why Financial Advisors Are Rethinking Gold Allocations
    Why Financial Advisors Are Rethinking Gold Allocations
    Image for From Opaque to Investable: Yaniv Bertele's Blueprint for Transparent Alternatives
    From Opaque to Investable: Yaniv Bertele's Blueprint for Transparent Alternatives
    View All Investing Posts
    Previous Investing PostHAS THE AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR BOTTOMED IN THE SHORT-TERM?
    Next Investing PostLITIGATION FUNDING – A BIG BUSINESS & GROWING INVESTMENT VEHICLE