• Top Stories
  • Interviews
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Banking
  • Technology
  • Investing
  • Trading
  • Videos
  • Awards
  • Magazines
  • Headlines
  • Trends
Close Search
00
GBAF LogoGBAF Logo
  • Top Stories
  • Interviews
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Banking
  • Technology
  • Investing
  • Trading
  • Videos
  • Awards
  • Magazines
  • Headlines
  • Trends
GBAF Logo
  • Top Stories
  • Interviews
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Banking
  • Technology
  • Investing
  • Trading
  • Videos
  • Awards
  • Magazines
  • Headlines
  • Trends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking and Finance Review

Global Banking & Finance Review

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Wealth
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2025 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved.

    ;
    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Banking

    Posted By Gbaf News

    Posted on September 26, 2018

    Featured image for article about Banking

    Comparing the capital levels, capital composition and excess over supervisory requirements of Europe’s larger banks disproves the widely-held mantra of many analysts, investors and media that the European banking sector is structurally under-capitalised.

    This erroneous view is still popular, especially in a global context; the unfavorable comparison with the large US banks a particularly common theme.

    A brief report by Scope, out today, shows the comparative capital positions of 57 EU banks in 15 countries, three Swiss banks, and 11 banks from the other developed markets.

    There are three main takeaways. First, all 57 EU banks exceed their 2018 SREP requirements. In the country-specific comparisons, which show the banks’ capital mix (available in the report), the 57 banks also exceed Scope estimates for 2019 SREP requirements.

    Second, within the EU, specific SREP requirements differ in accordance with the supervisory jurisdiction. Nordic authorities (especially in Sweden) and the UK’s Prudential Supervisory Authority require relatively higher SREP levels than the ECB/Single Supervisory Mechanism. Total capital levels need thus to be assessed in this more relative context.

    Third, Scope’s comparison of large banks’ capital positions in developed markets worldwide shows that the large European institutions are not under-capitalised compared to the large US groups. On the contrary, it shows a relative balance across the global large bank universe (Europe, US, Canada, Japan, Australia) going beyond the GSIB category.

    Notwithstanding the above, “a strong prudential capital position may in the future prove to be a potentially softer line of defence against future shocks, some of which less likely to be captured by suitable metrics,” cautions Sam Theodore, team leader for financial institutions at Scope Ratings. Examples of this cited by Theodore include the impact of massive or repeated cyberattacks; blows to reputation stemming from misconduct, or from indifference to environmental and social issues; and inadequate governance.

    If such negatives emerged, a solid prudential capital position would not represent a get-out-of-jail ticket in the eyes of customers and market participants

    Scope publicly rates more than 25 large European banks. In addition, it covers a larger number of other European banks. Most Scope ratings of large European banks are in the A/AA- range. In line with our methodology, these ratings are not propped up by any expected State support notches.

    To access the report, click here.

    Recommended for you

    • Thumbnail for recommended article

    • Thumbnail for recommended article

    • Thumbnail for recommended article

    Why waste money on news and opinions when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe