Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.


  • Disillusionment among British SMEs as an estimated 4m think new late payment reporting obligations will make no difference to their business
  • Changes come against backdrop of late payment crisis, as £266bn in SME turnover is locked up in late payments, with one in ten seeing worsening payment terms since Brexit vote
  • Late payment crisis could deepen thanks to new rules if large corporates respond by extending payment terms to create illusion that they paying on time
  • Almost our in five (78%) SME decision makers don’t know of new payment obligations, which would make it almost impossible for them to use the rules as leverage to resist pressure from corporates to extend payment terms
  • Cross-party election consensus on critical importance of late payment must turn into action for next government

The vast majority (74%) of SME do not think new guidelines, forcing large businesses to detail how they pay smaller suppliers, will have an impact on late payments, according to new findings from Crossflow Payments, the supply chain finance platform. 

Just 17% of the decision makers from the  5.4m British SMEs think the recent introduction of the ‘Duty to Report’ measures, forcing large businesses to report publically on how they pay small businesses, including the average time they take to pay suppliers, will have a positive impact upon their business.

The harsh assessment comes as SMEs face an endemic working capital crunch, with an estimated £266bn of turnover locked up in late payments,3 as almost a quarter (23%) admit they usually receive payment for invoices late. One in ten (10%) SMEs say they have experienced an increase in late payments by their customers since the EU Referendum in June 2016.

Tony Duggan, Crossflow Payments CEO, commented on the research: 

“The vast majority of SMEs we polled think the new payment reporting rules will do nothing to fix the late payment crisis. They are right. In fact, the new rules could make a bad situation worse. An unintended consequence of the rules is that large corporates are likely to respond by negotiating longer payment terms with suppliers to shift the goalposts and create the illusion that they are paying on time. Add to the mix difficult trading conditions thanks to Brexit and we could see Britain’s late payment crisis deepen significantly.”

Impact of new payment reporting rules

The new measures implemented by the outgoing government in April are designed to drive up standards in payment practices by improving transparency in an attempt to tackle the chronic issue of late payments made by larger businesses to their suppliers. Large businesses will be required to report on their payment practices twice a year, including whether they pay their suppliers on time. Failure to report carries a risk of criminal proceedings.

Crossflow Payments points out that large corporates are unlikely to reduce their own working capital by paying suppliers faster, particularly in the face of difficult trading conditions thanks to Brexit uncertainty. Therefore, they may respond to the changes by trying to implement longer payment terms so that they are not seen to be paying late.

 SMEs unaware of new measures 

Crossflow payments believes that most SMEs are poorly placed to push back against corporates that seek to extend their payment terms. One of the reasons is that almost four in five (78%) SMEs were unaware of the new reporting obligations, a new duty forcing larger business to publish details of their supplier payment terms and practices to drive compliance with their payment terms to suppliers. The lack of knowledge means that SMEs won’t be able to use the leverage of the payment obligations in their negotiations with their large corporate customers. Crossflow Payments points out that many SMEs are dependent on contracts from large customers, creating an unequal playing field when it comes to negotiating payment terms.

Tony Duggan continues:

“The future government must build on the initial momentum of the guidelines and actively support new ways in which the late payment problem can be solved, such as through alternative finance platforms. 

“This election campaign has seen broad support for SMEs on the late payment issue and it is vital that talk turns to action for the next Government. Such action should include ensuring The Small Business Commissioner is appointed on time and given the necessary support to begin monitoring and publishing payment terms. Government should also consider the potential role innovative solutions, such as supply chain finance, can play in helping to square the circle of working capital needs for both SMEs and large businesses. 

“As the lifeblood of the UK economy, we cannot afford to ignore the late payment problem facing SMEs any longer.”