Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on October 9, 2025
2 min readLast updated: January 21, 2026
Add as preferred source on Google
Palestinian NGO Al-Haq challenges UK's decision to allow F-35 parts export to Israel, citing potential breaches of humanitarian law.
LONDON (Reuters) -A Palestinian rights group on Thursday sought to overturn a ruling that Britain lawfully allowed F-35 fighter jet components to be indirectly exported to Israel, despite accepting they could be used to breach international humanitarian law.
Al-Haq, a group based in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, unsuccessfully challenged Britain's Department for Business and Trade over its decision last year to exempt F-35 parts when it suspended export licences for arms that could be used in the conflict in Gaza.
The group asked the Court of Appeal for permission to challenge a lower court ruling that found Britain's decision was lawful and dismissed Al-Haq's challenge.
Al-Haq's case was heard as Israel and Palestinian militant group Hamas signed an agreement to cease fire and free Israeli hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners, the biggest step yet to end two years of war in which over 67,000 Palestinians have been killed.
BRITAIN'S EXEMPTION OF F-35 PARTS
When it suspended export licences in 2024, the United Kingdom had assessed Israel was not committed to complying with international humanitarian law in its military campaign in Gaza.
But Britain did not suspend licences for British-made F-35 components, which go into a pool of spare parts Israel can use on its existing F-35 jets.
London's High Court rejected the challenge in June, saying in its ruling that business minister Jonathan Reynolds was "faced with the blunt choice of accepting the F-35 carve out or withdrawing from the F-35 programme and accepting all the defence and diplomatic consequences which would ensue".
Lawyers for Al-Haq, however, said while Britain had assessed the risks of suspending the export of F-35 parts, it failed to properly assess the risks of continuing to do so.
James Eadie, a lawyer for the British government, argued the only certain way to ensure F-35 parts did not reach Israel was by withdrawing from the international F-35 programme, which would have had "extraordinarily serious impacts for the UK and international peace and security".
The Court of Appeal is expected to give its ruling at a later date.
(Reporting by Sam Tobin; Editing by Aidan Lewis)
International humanitarian law is a set of rules that seek to limit the effects of armed conflict for humanitarian reasons. It protects people who are not participating in hostilities and restricts the means and methods of warfare.
A court ruling is a formal decision made by a court of law regarding a legal case. It determines the outcome of the case and can set precedents for future cases.
A humanitarian organization is a non-profit entity that aims to promote human welfare and provide assistance to those in need, particularly in crisis situations such as conflicts or natural disasters.
Explore more articles in the Headlines category
