Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

Home > Top Stories > INTERNAL FLIGHTS HUNDREDS OF POUNDS CHEAPER THAN RAIL JOURNEYS

INTERNAL FLIGHTS HUNDREDS OF POUNDS CHEAPER THAN RAIL JOURNEYS

Published by Gbaf News

Posted on February 28, 2017

5 min read

Last updated: January 21, 2026

Lawmaker Kim Leadbeater discusses UK's assisted dying law changes - Global Banking & Finance Review — Image of Kim Leadbeater addressing the media about proposed changes to the UK's assisted dying law, emphasizing the removal of High Court judge sign-off to enhance the legislative process.

Passengers could save up to £218 on some journeys by taking internal flights over the train for UK business trips, new research has revealed.

Parking operator and retailer Airport Parking and Hotels (APH) examined the cost of travelling between major UK cities by different modes of transport.

Of the 17 direct return journeys that were available, 11 were cheaper to travel by air over rail. The savings over rail travel ranged from £22, between London and Manchester, to £218 between Edinburgh and Cardiff.

All trips researched for both air and rail were mid-week return journeys, with just over a week’s notice.

The flights were also found to take less time than travelling by car or train for every journey. The majority remained faster even when adding four hours for travelling to and through airports.

The amount of money saved per person for each round trip by choosing plane over the cheapest return train ticket include:

Edinburgh to Cardiff – £218.00
Southampton to Manchester – £99.65
Southampton to Newcastle – £96.85
Glasgow to Cardiff – £73.20
Newcastle to Cardiff – £48.60
Leeds to London – £41.00
Southampton to Glasgow – £32.50
Birmingham to Edinburgh – £31.00
Glasgow to London – £25.00
Southampton to Edinburgh – £24.20
Manchester to London – £22.00

In addition to the cost savings of air travel over rail, plane journeys release less CO2 per passenger than a single person travelling by car on all but two of the 17 trips, while still being cheaper than driving for four of the routes analysed.

Beverley Barden, head of marketing at APH, said: “We often think of it being expensive and wasteful to travel by air within the UK, but the reality in 2017 is that passengers could save a very significant amount, especially if staff make regular trips on these routes.

“Furthermore, while air and train fares do fluctuate hugely, this research shows that air travel is in many cases quicker and more cost effective than travelling by rail, even when booked at short notice.

“The fact that flying is, in most cases, better for the environment than driving will also be a surprise to many people. Taking an internal flight between cities can be cheaper, faster and more efficient than travelling by train or car, and could save passengers hundreds of pounds over a year, especially for regular trips.”

For more details of APH’s research into travelling around the UK by different modes of transport, visit http://www.aph.com/community/holidays/planes-beat-trains-cost-travel-latest-research/.

Passengers could save up to £218 on some journeys by taking internal flights over the train for UK business trips, new research has revealed.

Parking operator and retailer Airport Parking and Hotels (APH) examined the cost of travelling between major UK cities by different modes of transport.

Of the 17 direct return journeys that were available, 11 were cheaper to travel by air over rail. The savings over rail travel ranged from £22, between London and Manchester, to £218 between Edinburgh and Cardiff.

All trips researched for both air and rail were mid-week return journeys, with just over a week’s notice.

The flights were also found to take less time than travelling by car or train for every journey. The majority remained faster even when adding four hours for travelling to and through airports.

The amount of money saved per person for each round trip by choosing plane over the cheapest return train ticket include:

Edinburgh to Cardiff – £218.00
Southampton to Manchester – £99.65
Southampton to Newcastle – £96.85
Glasgow to Cardiff – £73.20
Newcastle to Cardiff – £48.60
Leeds to London – £41.00
Southampton to Glasgow – £32.50
Birmingham to Edinburgh – £31.00
Glasgow to London – £25.00
Southampton to Edinburgh – £24.20
Manchester to London – £22.00

In addition to the cost savings of air travel over rail, plane journeys release less CO2 per passenger than a single person travelling by car on all but two of the 17 trips, while still being cheaper than driving for four of the routes analysed.

Beverley Barden, head of marketing at APH, said: “We often think of it being expensive and wasteful to travel by air within the UK, but the reality in 2017 is that passengers could save a very significant amount, especially if staff make regular trips on these routes.

“Furthermore, while air and train fares do fluctuate hugely, this research shows that air travel is in many cases quicker and more cost effective than travelling by rail, even when booked at short notice.

“The fact that flying is, in most cases, better for the environment than driving will also be a surprise to many people. Taking an internal flight between cities can be cheaper, faster and more efficient than travelling by train or car, and could save passengers hundreds of pounds over a year, especially for regular trips.”

For more details of APH’s research into travelling around the UK by different modes of transport, visit http://www.aph.com/community/holidays/planes-beat-trains-cost-travel-latest-research/.