German court orders X to grant data access for Hungary election research
Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on February 18, 2026
3 min readLast updated: February 18, 2026
Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on February 18, 2026
3 min readLast updated: February 18, 2026
A German court orders X to provide data access for Hungary's election research, enforcing EU transparency rules and impacting civil society.
By Hakan Ersen
BERLIN, Feb 18 (Reuters) - A German appeals court has ordered social media platform X to give vetted researchers access to publicly available data linked to Hungary's April 12 election, setting a precedent for enforcing EU digital transparency rules ahead of a contentious vote.
The Berlin Court of Appeal's ruling requires Elon Musk's X to share information such as the reach and engagement of posts related to Hungary's parliamentary election, Democracy Reporting International, one of two plaintiffs, said late on Tuesday.
A court spokesperson said on Wednesday the ruling takes immediate effect.
The decision is seen as a milestone in implementing the EU's Digital Services Act, a regulation mandating major online platforms to give researchers access to data to monitor risks including disinformation, hate speech and election manipulation.
X did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment.
PRECEDENT FOR RESEARCHER ACCESS ESTABLISHED
The plaintiffs - DRI and the Society for Civil Rights (GFF) - previously failed to obtain similar data from X for Germany's 2025 federal election.
In the current case, a lower court ruled that jurisdiction lay in Ireland, where X has its EU headquarters.
However, the Berlin appeals court revisited the issue, determining that German courts could act when there was a local problem, such as when German-based researchers were denied crucial data for public-interest work.
Ruling in favour of the two NGOs, the court said X's noncompliance affected their ability to conduct research in Germany.
"No appeal can be lodged against the decision," said Joschka Selinger, a lawyer for GFF, adding that it could be enforced through penalty payments if X fails to comply.
HUNGARY ELECTION PUSHES TRANSPARENCY DEBATE
Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban is facing the biggest challenge to his rule since his Fidesz party took power in 2010 as the centre-right opposition Tisza party leads in most opinion polls. Pro-government pollsters, however, put Fidesz in the lead, while many voters remain undecided.
Previous elections in Hungary have been overshadowed by reports of media bias and disinformation.
The Hungarian government did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment on Wednesday.
DRI contended that the court order would lower barriers for civil society groups across Europe seeking to enforce digital rights through national courts.
Observers view the decision as a signal to major platforms operating under the DSA that failure to facilitate researcher access could lead to legal consequences in EU member states.
(Reporting by Hakan Ersen, additional reporting by Anita Komuves, writing by Kirsti KnolleEditing by Gareth Jones)
The Digital Services Act is a regulation in the EU that requires major online platforms to provide access to data for researchers to monitor risks like disinformation and hate speech.
Data access refers to the ability to retrieve and use data from a database or online platform, often regulated by laws to ensure transparency and accountability.
Civil society encompasses organizations and institutions that represent the interests and will of the citizens, including NGOs, advocacy groups, and community organizations.
A court ruling is a decision made by a judge or court regarding a legal case, which can set precedents for future cases.
Transparency in data refers to the openness and clarity regarding how data is collected, used, and shared, ensuring accountability and trust.
Explore more articles in the Finance category


